Not completely, but a little fucked up. Can drown in poetry, get too horny. Can be lazy but also have OCD. Movies, books and music. Classy, pop and trashy.
@Musclemania79 Not a jockstrap. Jocks have straps attached diagonal from the side of the waistband to the crotch.
The hemline (pic) runs around his leg.
Likely, a trunk (CK pic attached) which gets transparent, around the cheeks when drenched.
Doesn't help his shorts are thin and light
@chen_wex@Charles_Fais Right. The length is shorter so it must be trunks.
Attached are CK trunks/boxer briefs. If the models were drenched, they'd look like him in the pic, but worse!
They get notoriously transparent, especially around the cheeks.
@CineAudu This is some other movie (I think the Italian movie Weekend released in 2020 based on the image), because the actors in this poster aren't Tom Cullen and Chris New.
I loved the original poster of Weekend so attaching here. It was one of the first things that drew me to the film.
🇺🇸BREAKING: Someone placed a $920 million crude oil short at 3:40 AM.
70 minutes later Axios reported the US and Iran were close to a deal.
Oil dropped 12%.
The trade made $125 million in profit.
Minutes after that Iran launched the “Persian Gulf Strait Authority” and oil surged 8%.
$760 million placed before Trump’s last announcement.
$920 million placed before this one.
Every major announcement in this war has been front-run by someone who knew it was coming.
What kind of war is this?
This is more like a trading desk with an army.
Never stop connecting the dots.
O Google acabou de transformar mais de 1 bilhão de computadores em depósito de IA.
Inclusive o seu.
Sem pedir. Sem avisar. Sem um único popup.
O Chrome baixou 4GB de modelo de inteligência artificial no seu disco. O arquivo se chama weights.bin, são os pesos do Gemini Nano. Fica numa pasta chamada OptGuideOnDeviceModel dentro do seu perfil do Chrome.
Você não autorizou nada. Até existe uma configuração para impedir, mas tá enterrada em submenus que ninguém encontra. E as AI features vêm ligadas por padrão.
Se você deletar o arquivo, o Chrome baixa de novo. Sozinho. Em silêncio. Você decide o que fica no seu disco e o navegador simplesmente ignora.
Funciona assim em Windows, macOS e Ubuntu. Logs forenses no macOS mostram que o arquivo foi instalado dia 24 de abril de 2026, misturado com patches de segurança. Desenvolvedores dizem que isso já rola há mais de um ano.
E tem um detalhe que deixa tudo mais ridículo:
O Chrome 147 coloca um botão "AI Mode" na barra de endereço. Você vê aquilo, sabe que tem modelo de IA no seu computador, e assume que suas buscas rodam localmente.
Não rodam. O AI Mode é 100% cloud. Tudo vai para os servidores do Google. O modelo de 4GB no seu disco não tem nada a ver com aquele botão.
Ele serve para quê? "Help me write" e detecção de scam. Coisas que vivem em submenus de clique-direito que você provavelmente nunca abriu.
O Google ocupou 4GB do seu disco sem pedir, para rodar coisas que quase ninguém usa, enquanto a IA que você de fato vê manda tudo para a nuvem.
Na Europa, pesquisadores já apontam violação do Artigo 5(3) da Diretiva ePrivacy, que exige consentimento antes de armazenar software no dispositivo do usuário.
Como desativar:
→ chrome://flags
→ Busque "Optimization Guide On Device Model"
→ Desative
→ Reinicie o Chrome
→ Delete a pasta OptGuideOnDeviceModel
Seu computador só é seu se você ficar de olho.
Two lonely young souls follow each other around the world for 10 years chasing their once-in-a-lifetime connection...
SOUL MATE premieres May 14. Starring Hayato Isomura and Ok Taec-yeon. Written and Directed by Shunki Hashizume.
you quite literally cannot be an enviornmentalist if you aren’t anti war, anti colonialism, and anti capitalism. and the sooner you understand that, the better our chances are at building a future where we actually survive the climate crisis that is ALREADY HERE.
Pls take two minutes to listen to her entire response not just the one sentence highlighted in the caption. She lays it out PERFECTLY.
"I'll first say a big shout out to Mike and Delroy, like let's continue to honor them for how they handled that in real time, the grace and the dignity that they exercised, and the whole home team, everybody that was out there, like really carried themselves well. I think the events this weekend exposed a couple things - Institutionally, we still don't understand what inclusion means."
"Just because you invite someone into a space, but you don't provide the necessary resources to keep them and everyone else in that room safe by them being there, that's not inclusivity. That's exploitation."
"That man's disability got exploited that night, and it led to multiple offenses. That's the BAFTA's fault. And then the BBC, to air what they aired is careless."
"And not like some haphazard accident, no, like a real lack of care was exercised for those two Black men. And we know the BBC knows how to take care of what they care about, right, because they censored a bunch of other... they went so far as to make sure certain things weren't topics of conversation."
"They censored Akinola's speech, the director of My Father's Shadow, which is an amazing film, by the way. So you censored one Black man, you failed to protect two others, and our production designer, Hannah, you do not care for our dignity, our humanity."
"You want to celebrate our art, but you won't protect, and that's why we celebrate sinners. That's why we celebrate Ryan. That's why we show up to the NAACP, because those are spaces where we felt safe, where we feel safe."
- Jayme Lawson
Modi’s labor codes aren’t “reform”. They are a legal blueprint for mass firings, wage cuts and crushed unions.
Three hundred million workers shutting India down is the verdict on the BJP’s entire project of rule for the rich.
Here is the story
https://t.co/92zUGMUEDU
Three hundred million workers staged the largest strike action in human history. They shut down India, a G20 economy. Most of you are hearing about it for the first time now.
That’s not poor journalism.
That’s deliberate erasure of working-class power in real time. My latest👇🏾
Hamas handed Israel 66 boxes each one containing the skull of a hostage
They then returned the bodies of female hostages cut open with their organs removed
Wait that was actually the IDF not Hamas
Let me know if you still feel as sick and enraged as you did 10 seconds ago
-Google has removed the social media app UpScrolled from its store. The app is an alternative platform founded by a Palestinian living in Australia in response to restrictions on freedom of expression on major platforms.
-YouTube has deleted the channel of American activist @guychristensen_ after he posted content criticizing the genocide.
-An Israeli employee at Israel’s Paragon Solutions mistakenly revealed the live interface of the company’s Graphite spyware in a LinkedIn post.
-Pager attack.
- Severe shadow banning on X and the deliberate mislabeling of media as “graphic.”
- The takeover of TikTok and the policies followed.
This only accelerates the decline of the current world order.
Once a sovereign country bans Western communication devices, companies, social media apps, app stores, and operating systems, it is no longer about being “anti–freedom of speech,” but rather a matter of national security. That rhetoric will no longer work.
We are in an era where everything is out in the open, as Sinwar promised: “This city (Gaza) will expose everyone.” (VIDEO)
Amazing article by THR, linking together all the most recent known victims of TAG PR.
@garymbaum thanks for the great piece. If you put those sites through the Wayback machine, you'll uncover even more insanity.
The Alexander brothers site literally smears victims of some of the worst crimes and engages in victim blaming.
The MHJ site shows that the smear campaign extended to NewJeans themselves (thereby targeting a minor) and also the fandom (technically making it a smear campaign against millions of people).
What's scary about this is that this article also speaks about many more sites that weren't mentioned in court. Just how many more victims are there?
And this is only one of the many PR agencies. Is anyone safe at this point?
For anyone wondering why the French are now investigating Elon Musk, in just 11 days in January, the AI of this man who repeatedly begged to be allowed on Epstein Island created over 3 million sexualized deepfakes, more than 23k of them involving children.
This is a genuinely incredible story.
The hottest term on Chinese social media right now is “kill-line”: if you go to Xiaohongshu, Bilibili or Douyin, everyone is speaking about it.
Why? It all has to do with the story of Alex, known as “牢A” (“Láo A”, literally “prison A” where A stands for Alex), a Chinese medical/biology student based in Seattle, USA, who worked part-time as a forensic assistant collecting unclaimed bodies (primarily homeless people).
You’ve doubtlessly never heard of him but he probably single-handedly shattered what remained of the “American Dream” myth for an entire generation of young Chinese.
In late 2025, Alex started going massively viral on Bilibili, a Chinese video platform, for videos where he described poverty in America. He coined the term “kill line” (“斩杀线”) - an expression borrowed from gaming describing when a game character's health is so low one hit will finish them. In Alex’s framing, the concept describes how a single shock (illness, job loss, accident) can push middle-class Americans into irreversible poverty.
It’s hard to overstate the cultural impact he’s had in China. In barely a few weeks, “kill line” became part of everyday lexicon. So much so that even Qiushi - the core theoretical journal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China - published a lengthy theoretical analysis using "kill line" as its central framework (https://t.co/8VRe3xNj8S).
This never happens. Gaming slang coined by a 22-year-old streamer based in the U.S. does not become the analytical framework for Qiushi, the CPC’s core theoretical journal, in just a handful of weeks. That’s normally not how Communist Party theory gets crafted, to put it mildly 😂. And yet here we are - which goes to show just how powerfully Alex resonated.
It didn’t take long for America to notice - and for Alex’s problems to start.
Due to the staggering resonance his content was having in China, Alex became the target of an extremely vicious doxxing campaign by Chinese dissidents.
He also got targeted by Western media with the New York Times, among others, publishing a piece (https://t.co/dOtHBR6Eu3) identifying him as the origin of the phenomenon which they described - unsurprisingly - as Communist propaganda meant to “deflect criticism of [Chinese] leaders.”
I just wrote an article telling the full story. It ends with Alex escaping to China in an extraction worthy of a Cold War spy novel. Think about how extraordinary this is: a Chinese student fleeing to China for safety, because he feared for his life after being harassed for describing poverty in America.
Full story here: https://t.co/3vzUmnGurq
[English Translation]
The media is strange.
The core of yesterday’s press conference was this: Park Jeong-gyu’s interview, where he claimed that “Min Hee-jin proposed tampering and I was betrayed”, was a blatant lie fabricated to manipulate stock prices. Yet it’s hard to find a single headline that makes this clear at a glance. Instead, there are headlines that mislead readers about the substance, headlines that make it seem as though Min Hee-jin said things she never even mentioned, and headlines that cleverly dress up words she never spoke.
Legacy media news feeds are flooded with clickbait keywords like “a nationwide scam orchestrated by the family,” “fainting,” “blaming others,” “mother,” “betrayal,” and “divide-and-conquer.” Meanwhile, the names “Davolink” and “Park Jeong-gyu” are either missing entirely or quietly buried. Netizens who encounter this coverage then mock Min Hee-jin, boasting about how “smart” the public is for not falling for her so-called “media play,” ridiculing her as foolish and malicious.
If you’ve followed this case for a long time, you can clearly see which wording and frames will generate the most backlash against Min Hee-jin, which core points need to be concealed, and which parts of the story most easily provoke public outrage. The media moves precisely in that direction. The press conference materials explicitly asked the media to protect the members and to focus on Park Jeong-gyu, a figure tied to stock manipulation. The media moved in exactly the opposite direction.
In that media environment, you also see comment sections with a strangely uniform age-group distribution, perfectly echoing the direction set by the press, while simultaneously claiming they are “not being fooled by media play.” Those comments reproduce complete misunderstandings of what was actually said at the press conference.
Fans are left asking: Is the media accurately conveying the essence of the press conference? If the core issues are hidden and only the most provocative elements are highlighted, leading the public to believe they understand the press conference when they do not, can the media still be said to be fulfilling its role? Why does the media, which shapes the flow of public opinion, move with such consistency in one direction? Who benefits from that flow? And ultimately, who is really engaging in “media play”?
260128 Min Hee-jin's Third Press Conference
Press Cooperation Materials
Sender: Attorney Kim Sun-woong, Law Firm Jiam (010-7234-3476)
Recipient: All media outlets
Subject: Press Conference on the Truth Behind Min Hee-jin’s “NewJeans Tampering”
Date & Time: Wednesday, January 28, 2026, 1:00 PM
Venue: Challenge Hall, 2nd Floor, Gyowon Jonggak Building, 6 Ujeongguk-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul
------
Just one day before the start of the new year in 2026, on December 30, 2025, Min Hee-jin, former CEO of ADOR, was served with a complaint seeking KRW 10 billion in damages on the grounds that she had “led the termination of NewJeans’ exclusive contracts and poached NewJeans through tampering, thereby infringing ADOR’s creditor rights.”
Former CEO Min believed that her relationship with HYBE-ADOR had been resolved and that all NewJeans members would return, and concluded that each party should simply do their best for the future of NewJeans.
However, as ADOR has attempted to dismantle NewJeans by terminating the contract of only one member, Danielle, and has continued attempts to exploit the families of the members in the litigation between former CEO Min and HYBE, concerns over the disbandment of NewJeans have grown, leaving her no choice but to state her minimum position.
With the recent assistance of professional legal counsel, former CEO Min learned that the so-called claim of “Min Hee-jin’s NewJeans tampering,” raised by HYBE management, major shareholders, and certain media outlets, was in fact not her doing, but rather a “stock-market-manipulation conspiracy” colluded between a family member of one NewJeans member and a specific businessperson.
In particular, evidence has been obtained showing that HYBE’s management already knew that the forces behind this alleged stock-price manipulation conspiracy had devised and were attempting to carry out a plan to exploit former CEO Min and the NewJeans members. This press conference has been convened to reveal these facts.
------
[The Truth About the NewJeans Tampering Allegations]
The dispute that arose in April 2024 between former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin and ADOR’s major shareholder, HYBE, had absolutely nothing to do with NewJeans tampering. Rather, it stemmed from differences in perspective regarding how HYBE’s affiliated subsidiaries should be operated.
At the time, HYBE publicly disclosed the audit of CEO Min, bringing the conflict between HYBE and former CEO Min to the surface, but issues concerning NewJeans’ exclusive contracts or their future were entirely unrelated on HYBE’s side.
However, following former CEO Min’s dismissal in August 2024 and the NewJeans members’ notices of termination of their exclusive contracts on the grounds of management contract violations, a media outlet reported on December 2, 2024, that “Min Hee-jin met with Park Jeong-gyu, said to be the beneficial owner of Davolink, on September 30, 2024,” raising so-called “tampering” allegations. From that point on, the shareholder dispute between ADOR’s major shareholder HYBE and Min Hee-jin rapidly shifted into an issue framed as Min Hee-jin’s “NewJeans tampering.”
In addition, on January 9, 2025, the media outlet TenAsia published an interview article with Park Jeong-gyu, who referred to himself as the chairman of Davolink. In the article, claims were circulated such as: “Min Hee-jin discussed ways to take NewJeans away,” “I received a request from CEO Min for a 5-billion-won investment,” “CEO Min had plans to acquire Davolink,” and “she made crude remarks, calling Chairman Bang a ‘pig XX.’”
Through this reporting, former CEO Min was portrayed as having requested an investment from Park Jeong-gyu in order to take NewJeans away.
As a result of the above media reports, the shareholder dispute between former CEO Min and HYBE came to be perceived not as an issue of guaranteeing independent label operations, but as an attempt to fabricate a pretext for taking NewJeans away. From that point on, the narrative of former CEO Min’s “NewJeans tampering” became treated as an established fact, and all criticism was directed at her.
However, the so-called “NewJeans tampering” by former CEO Min was not true and was entirely fabricated. At the time, former CEO Min made efforts to reach a settlement with HYBE regarding the return and resumption of activities of NewJeans, even to the extent of substantially conceding her contractual rights under the shareholder agreement.
From this point forward, we will reveal that the actual tampering was prepared through collusion between a family member of a NewJeans member and forces engaged in capital-market manipulation, and we will disclose evidence of this, including Telegram messages and audio recordings.
● Around June 2024, former CEO Min heard from the father of one NewJeans member, “My older brother has a wide network and strong connections, so if you entrust him with negotiations with HYBE, he will do well.” Although she was skeptical, because this person was a member’s family, former CEO Min received the contact information of the member’s uncle (the father’s older brother) on July 26, 2024. However, this uncle, identified as Mr. ◯◯, failed to produce any results through August 2024.
● On August 27, 2024, former CEO Min was dismissed from her position as CEO of ADOR, and NewJeans’ activities faced the risk of being derailed.
● On September 9, 2024, the member’s uncle, Mr. ◯◯, contacted former CEO Min again. He showed her Telegram messages he had exchanged with Shin Young-jae, a key executive at HYBE, flaunting his personal connection with Shin, and stated that he would “proceed with negotiations with HYBE.”