@austincampbell The more pertinent question is, would this asset class even exist if it was based on revenue? If the answer is no, then the natural answer is either this industry shouldn’t exist or you are miss understanding its value proposition.
@austincampbell In fact, going after revenue buyers doesn’t even make any sense, because anyone, long enough in crypto, will tell you these assets are systematic underperformers in revenue growth compared to TradFi assets. Crypto is in absolute comparative disadvantage.
@TXMCtrades It is because the AI catalyst driving equities has tangential connection with BTC or crypto? What is the point of these rhetorical questions?
Someone tell me why this isn't bearish for Ethereum?
A major fintech with a big move into stablecoins is not launching it on Ethereum.
If Tempo didn't exist then this would have likely launched on Ethereum or an ETH L2...
Tempo taking marketshare in what is the main thesis for Ethereum: stablecoins.
@0xthorchain@jpthor If you designed your chain’s survivorship to depend on censorship, then you don’t get to compare yourself against BTC/ETH. That is your design problem.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol I can understand ppl gambling on launchpads because they were naive and had a bad prior these new launches aren’t rigged. But it would also be weird to try and force a tool with extra steps into workflow leading to lower productivity.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol It is because these products have no interest. I use stuff like Dropbox, Microsoft Team etc. in my work. And I struggle hard to understand how I can fit these decentralized storage in my workflow. You can’t call it utility if it doesn’t solve a problem ppl have.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol A protocol gets liquidity from either 1) token investment or 2) fees from use. 2) isn’t mutually exclusive with whatever ppl do on-chain. Since you mentioned liquidity, I assume you meant 1).
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol Is it a reframing of your tweet to say you claimed, DePIN struggled because it solved boring real world problems and didn’t give ppl the gambling itch? I am saying the lack of demand shows it is solving fictitious problems and buying their token is no different from gambling.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol Equity performance should follow your earnings, not the other way around. If you do it other way round, it is another slot machine just with more steps.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol The narrative was “about the product” but most couldn’t divorce their operation from the token performance. Remember, they need the token liquidity to subsidize their operations. If you look at good Web 2 businesses, your equity performance shouldn’t dictate your earnings.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol A lot of DeFi is a circular game fueled by token emission. But DePIN is worse. Its operation is nearly always subsidized by token emission. And its circular game breaks a lot easier, because you let those with little stake in token, hardware operator, to eat emission.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol By “financial crimes”, do you mean like pump and dumps? A lot of DePIN charts look very similar. Most of the time, their interest also stem from token performance as supposed to actual usage.
@joe4deadcat@Jackal_Protocol By nodes, you mean the validators for the L1? Not sure what you mean by needing “financial crime” to stay relevant for DeFi/memes.