If you’re going to come on social media to educate, you need to tell the whole story. The other half of the story is that tariffs can drive incentives for U.S. companies to bring manufacturing back to the United States. This creates a chain of jobs throughout the process as companies build or purchase facilities, source materials from other U.S. businesses, and manufacture products domestically. The long-term effect can be a cycle of success for a network of businesses and workers, ultimately contributing to a more robust U.S. economy.
@burnmic79@JoshEakle@MTomasco6 True, reshoring requires building both manufacturing capacity and a skilled workforce. Automation, re-skilling, and targeted immigration could bridge the gap. It’s about smart growth—leveraging tech, empowering our workforce, and welcoming talent where needed...legally.
@swombat@JoshEakle@MTomasco6 You spend your all of your budget on a band aid then you will have nothing left to grow. Stockpiling is short sided. It will catch up to you. Think about it
Think again. Agriculture workers make up 1.2% of US employment—about 2.6M people. Even if 360K (14% according to you) undocumented workers left, the economy wouldn’t collapse. Over 2.5M have crossed the border in 2024 alone. The real risk? Straining our resources by providing all expenses paid vacation for all illegals without requiring work.
No! While there might be short-term effects, these can be offset by lower taxes. In the long run, strategic tariffs are designed to boost U.S. jobs and profitability, strengthening the economy. Tariffs, when applied thoughtfully, can have lasting benefits. Don’t just take others’ word for it—research for yourself!
On the contrary, reacting by stockpiling products from other countries instead of investing in their own business, people, or country is short-sighted. BYW, tariffs aren’t the same as taxes; tariffs on imports are paired with lower taxes in the U.S. to offset higher import costs. There’s a bigger story here about strategic, long-term growth.
@JoshEakle@RationalBlonde Offset higher prices with tax savings, local sourcing, or by manufacturing products yourself. Price increases may be short-term, but the long-term benefits—more stability, local jobs, and growth—are worth it. Think strategically!
Typical short-term thinking. Cutting Christmas bonuses to stock up on imports before tariffs and using employees as pawns misses the bigger picture. Screw buying imported products. Invest in U.S. suppliers, use tax breaks to counter increased tariff impact, and support your employees to create stability and growth long-term. #BusinessStrategy #Tariffs #ThinkAhead
Interesting that you didn’t mention her role as Vice President of the United States in her ‘resume.’ Was this an oversight, or does it reflect a broader perception of her performance in that role, as even her own party had criticized her performance, let alone the entire country with the lowest VP rating in history?
@wcchen@pynkchola@JaymalGreen This is clearly an opinion piece employing the same tactics as the Harris campaign—distracting and evading. No substantive discussion of Harris’s policies, only Trump bashing.
@harris_wins, it’s probably a good thing you’re hiding behind an alias because you’re essentially insulting your followers by trying to present this video as proof of Trump’s involvement in Project 2025, let alone implementing it. I am sure the intelligent followers have done their research and know that Project 2025 is part of ‘The Mandate for Leadership’ series, first implemented in 1981 by The Heritage Foundation to influence government policy. It wasn’t initiated by Trump, and there’s no evidence of any direct involvement from him now.
@MikeSington Have you considered how your perspective aligns with reality? I’m concerned that some people may be misinformed, and I sincerely hope we can have an open discussion about it. Wishing you the best and hoping for clarity.
@XPlusSports@Rate_the_Refs Read the rules. It’s not intentional grounding if passing motion is initiated and impacted by defensive contact with QB, the ball does not have to land in the vicinity of the intended receiver, #11 in this case.