Matthew Doyle

I'm a Christian as Biblically defined. Postmillennialist. Theonomic-Reconstructionist (not a Christian Nationalist). Presuppositionalist in apologetics.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@AgentCLol1 @CalebDixonSmith @TJSumpter You can make that claim all you want to. It proves nothing. You didn't substantiate it; you pontificated.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@andy_schreiber @TJSumpter No theonomist has a problem with WCF 19:4 or WCF 20:1, which only speaks of the abrogation of the ceremonial law, NOT the judicial law.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@RealDavidReece @joe_rigney @TJSumpter Spot on!

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@hermontagodwin @joe_rigney @TJSumpter Thomistic natural law is determined by the use of "right reason," not by an appeal to biblical law.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@andy_schreiber @TJSumpter So you're a theonomist?

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@hermontagodwin @joe_rigney @TJSumpter Wolfe is an advocate of Thomistic natural law. That is not synonymous with biblical law.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@andy_schreiber @TJSumpter So in your view, "natural law" is different from the law in scripture? Again, how does it differ, and where is it found, the Psalms? But the Psalms are scripture?

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@joe_rigney @TJSumpter You actually think the article you linked is a "good article" on general equity?

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@CalebDixonSmith @TJSumpter No it doesn't.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@QuixoteSword @joe_rigney @TJSumpter That's not what he does.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@andy_schreiber @TJSumpter What is "natural law?" Where do we find it stated?

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

Victor Davis Hanson puts things in perspective.

https://t.co/HTUTvvGuKz

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

Is Stephen Wolfe up to the challenge? Which is it for you, Stephen? There are only two choices.

[Toby Sumpter @TJSumpter]

David Reece: Natural law as an alternative to theonomy is easy to defeat, if you know what your opponent is talking about.

Most natural law proponents will not very clearly define their view.

When they do, they either:

(1) agree with theonomy that the propositional revelation of the Triune God (Scripture) is the lone standard for doctrine and practice (including for the civil power), or(2) disagree with theonomy that the propositional revelation of the Triune God (Scripture) is the lone standard for doctrine and practice (including for the civil power).

If they disagree, then they reject Sola Scriptura and the term “natural law” provides a useful distinguisher from theonomy.

If they agree, then we hold to the same position. What are we talking about? I propose we not use the term “natural law” since it is less clear, and instead talk about the general equity of the civil laws of Israel. In other words, “theonomy”...

- @RealDavidReece

Read the rest ⬇️

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

This is precisely what Trump did in Paris today. It is utterly mind-boggling, and all of his supporters have been completely duped.

https://t.co/lKnePpzLus

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@EmmanuelMacron Bullshit! Anyone reading it knows Trump surrendered and betrayed all of us who supported him in this war.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@WhiteHouse What a disaster! All talk and, in the end, no action. You and the GOP are done. What a waste of money and time.

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

Here it is. Read it and weep. What a total and complete cave by Trump. As far as I can see, none of his imperatives at the beginning of the war are contained in the MOU. Billions will be given and sanctions lifted so they can rebuild their war and terrorist machine again. And the people of Iran will continue to be under these butcher's tyranny.

https://t.co/GDhCFTSvmS

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

If this is true and Shapiro is right, Trump just caved, and any justification for this war was entirely bogus. It will also guarantee the loss of Congress and his impeachment. If the MAGA base doesn't abandon ship after this, I suppose it never will.

https://t.co/WJr10N7jhL

[Matthew Doyle @MatthewDoyle4]

@ClaireFosterPHD @GOP_is_Gutless There is no such idiom as "folded like a potato." There is "folded like a sack of potatoes." Your 169 IQ didn't remember that?