@DAaronovitch More evasion dressed as "sensible".
My language is moderate, but my being "cross" is reasonable and a feeble excuse to run away.
If you had an answer that you were happy about, you'd have given it ten tweets ago.
You're evidently not a serious individual.
@DAaronovitch After all, it's also the go-to description widely applied in newspapers and by certain broadcasters to, well, Wokeism.
Which is real and needs to be challenged, right?
@DAaronovitch Aren't you concerned that criticising those who use it that way, while never criticising Wokeism itself, leaves you vulnerable to credible accusations of being, well, a Wokeist yourself?
@DAaronovitch Again: why use the word "Woke" in your critique of objections to the Pope's action? Is it because you think "Wokeism" is a rightwing fantasy/invention rather than a totalitarian religion you should be challenging (but are actually supportive/scared of?)
@DAaronovitch A clumsy evasion of a perfectly reasonable question which hints rather strongly at the answer. (As if it wasn't obvious already.)
Unedifying.
@ed_unwa @JohnsonLevant @Glinner Do you know your first assertion is antisemitic? Or are you really that thick? (And racist?)
Try this:
"A white-supremacist is somebody who blacks donโt like, not somebody who doesnโt like blacks."
See it now?
@dauntnot @JohnsonLevant @ed_unwa You think denouncing gang-rape and torture committed by Hamas necessarily equates to hating Palestinians? Even though Palestinians are the main victims of Hamas, through their "governance" and their use of their own citizens as human shields?
Really?
@dauntnot @JohnsonLevant @ed_unwa @Glinner What's your opinion of what Assad did to Palestinians in Syria? Presumably you care about Palestinians everywhere, and not just the ones fighting Jews?