@_N_H_T_@PrishaMosley@rot77268349 If clinicians are using these guidelines, it is absolutely right to hold them to hold them liable for the results of their work.
@_N_H_T_@PrishaMosley@rot77268349 All the more reason the medical professionals need to be held to account for their shabby work. Look, WPATH just admitted in a court filing that their recommendations are not scientifically based, and are intended to be "opinions." 1/2
@_N_H_T_@PrishaMosley@rot77268349 The issue is that it should never have happened in the first place. And she is not unique. Protecting children from harm is a necessity in a civilized society.
@_N_H_T_@PrishaMosley@rot77268349 The doctors are responsible for their prescriptions and treatments. They have agency. They're allowed to say they will not offer a certain service. They don't get MDs to take orders from teenagers.
@_N_H_T_@PrishaMosley@rot77268349 Making a child responsible for their health care decisions is evil. We have laws prohibiting it for this very reason. They aren't capable of it.
@NiftyNick4 It wasn't FFP. It was the banks. Arsenal had no collateral when the club built the Emirates, so they had to accept very strict terms on the construction loans.
@Sachinettiyil She left her husband for a much younger professional soccer player. Yes, we're all sinners, but maybe there are better examples of Christian virtue.
๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ Has everyone seen that WPATH admitted its "standards of care" were developed *without evidence*??
No evidence of youth suicides
No evidence of permanency of ideation
No evidence that cosmetic changes give mental relief.
No evidence of this as 'innate condition'
No evidence of benefit to early treatment
No evidence of pediatric self knowledge