Maura Jones

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

@WalthamHawks CONGRATS on an AMAZING career!! You have made an everlasting impact on SO many!!! ❤️ Wishing you all the best!

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

@Jrudzinsky @MPSPanthers @WMCTSports

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

@DrBradJohnson Louder for the people in the back!!!!

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

Hope to see a lot of people come out TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26th at 7:00 PM to the Annual Turkey Day Smoker!
🏈🧡🖤🦃❤️🤍🏈
Tickets 🎟️ $10
Venmo accepted or cash
@Jrudzinsky @WMCTSports @HHSHawksAD

[𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐝 𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐧 @DrBradJohnson]

In Japan, instead of pressuring young students with standardized assessments, schools focus on practices like o-soji, where students clean their own classrooms and hallways, which teaches responsibility, teamwork, and respect for their environment. In early years there is no standardized tests and they focus on things like socialization, moral education, and developing foundational skills like cooperation, respect, and self-discipline.

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

MHS ALL Sports Booster Club is looking for new officers! Please fill out Google form if interested! #GoPanthers 👏🏼🧡🐾 @Jrudzinsky https://t.co/7IdWJrNPlP

[Nurse_Kim @RealNurseKim]

The creator has done incredible work. Please watch and note the following:
ALL key cycles are recorded by Toyota Tech Stream. NOT just “events”. This has been verified by Lexus/Toyota Tech expert at Lexus Danvers. Karen bought her 2021 Lexus LX 570 in 2021 and had total of 1160 key cycles on the morning of 1/29/22. Key cycle #1162 is the alleged “incident” and curiously #1163 is missing as presented by the expert testimony of Trooper Paul. I find it particularly concerning that this case is the first time Trooper Paul had interpreted Toyota Tech Stream data even though the technology has been available since 2014
(a decade 🤯) He also did not request the information until a year later in Feb 2023 to “help us with the case” since the EDR *black box* showed NO events on Karen’s vehicle.
Ask yourself: How did the Commonwealth start their “testing” on 2/1/22 at #1164 with just 2 key cycles recorded prior to the “event” of Karen striking Officer O’Keefe with her vehicle?
We KNOW she traveled at 12:30AM from 34 Fairview to 1 Meadows, at 5:08AM from 1 Meadows to Country Lane, back to 1 Meadows, then to Dighton? These are trips when SUV is in KR possession. Then tow truck company took possession of SUV and drove vehicle on to flat bed and finally SUV driven off flat bed into CPD Sallyport? There are at least 5 KEY CYCLES before #1162 which would be the actual cycle of Karen Read and Officer O’Keefe at 34 Fairview.

The Commonwealth’s Theory does NOT logistically work… 😳

[Urban Meyer @CoachUrbanMeyer]

incredible.

[New England Patriots @Patriots]

Now playing on screens everywhere!

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

The Marlborough Booster Club would like to Congratulate Athletic Director JEFF RUDZINSKY who was honored as Athletic Director of the Year for District 3!👏🏼🏆🐾#WellDeserved Thank You for all you do!🧡@WMCTSports @Jrudzinsky @MPSPanthers @MetroWestSports @tgsports

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

@TedDanielnews BTW Where is that dog?!?

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

THIS!!!!!!!! #FKR

[Olivia @OliviaLambo_]

If the Commonwealth truly believed Jen McCabe didn’t make the incriminating “hos long to die in cold” Google search at 2:27am, they’re well aware they could’ve easily disproved it in about 2 seconds flat by subpoenaing Google.

That costs them nothing, and they have subpoena power. But that is, of course, if they were actually confident and believed this search didn’t occur.

Why haven’t they subpoenaed Google? Don’t they want to get at the truth of the matter?

Seems like they’re afraid of what the truth will show. That alone is alarming, and should concern every member of the public.

This is another reason why defendants seldom pursue a third party culpability defense.

Why? Because unlike the defense, the state has subpoena power and can immediately obtain third-party records, like from Google and Verizon for instance, that could easily get at the truth of the matter and refute a defendant’s claims—that is, if their claims are untrue.

This is why if a defendant is truly guilty, it’s ill-advised to pursue a third-party culpability defense because it can easily be shot down. Particularly such a targeted and precise third party culpability defense as Read’s.

This theory of defense, however, would be pursued by an individual who cares more about justice—say, for their loved one—and about exonerating herself.

A guilty person cares more about getting off. An innocent person cares more about the truth.

The state has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. So, why would a defendant who’s guilty pursue a theory of defense that essentially shifts this burden when they only have to raise reasonable doubt? Hint: they wouldn’t.

The Commonwealth’s case against Karen Read has enough reasonable doubt to drive a Mack truck through it—and that’s an understatement.

Karen Read appears to be a smart woman. Do you really think if she were at all guilty she would pursue a theory that the state could easily disprove? The state can’t even prove their OWN case, as is—of course she wouldn’t!

If Karen Read were truly guilty, why would she be asking, practically begging, the state to hand over evidence that would incriminate her?

Probably because they know it wouldn’t incriminate her. And/or probably because they know it would incriminate others.

And if she were truly guilty, and the evidence would incriminate her, then why has the state, at every turn, fought against turning over the evidence?

In fact, they’ve even gone great lengths to sabotage or avoid getting Court-ordered evidence, by sending improper preservation letters or asking Ring Security how long their data is stored in their systems (90 days) so they could intentionally run out the clock and file a search warrant for the system nearly a year later so this data would forever be lost, for instance.

These actions appear to reflect overwhelming Brady violations (withholding of exculpatory evidence) by the state.

The Touhy evidence, however, will likely recuperate many of these discrepancies—recovering much of this withheld, “lost”, sabotaged, or “destroyed” exculpatory evidence.

The Feds didn’t turn over 3,000+ pages of nothing-burgers! This will be BIG! And the Commonwealth only has themselves to thank for they’ve made their own beds.

Just a reminder, The DOJ informed DA Michael Morrissey’s Office that:

“Based on my understanding from that discussion with USA Levy, his office has a very different opinion of the circumstances in this case than as presented in Mr. Morrissey's letter.”

Do the actions of DA Michael Morrissey’s Office, or The Commonwealth, reflect a prosecution that cares more about getting at the truth of the matter—getting justice for Officer #JohnOKeefe, who was so callously murdered, or trying to confirm their bias in their attempts to prove their case against #KarenRead?

What evidence are you most eager to see?

#JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonMA #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

[Olivia @OliviaLambo_]

If the Commonwealth truly believed Jen McCabe didn’t make the incriminating “hos long to die in cold” Google search at 2:27am, they’re well aware they could’ve easily disproved it in about 2 seconds flat by subpoenaing Google.

That costs them nothing, and they have subpoena power. But that is, of course, if they were actually confident and believed this search didn’t occur.

Why haven’t they subpoenaed Google? Don’t they want to get at the truth of the matter?

Seems like they’re afraid of what the truth will show. That alone is alarming, and should concern every member of the public.

This is another reason why defendants seldom pursue a third party culpability defense.

Why? Because unlike the defense, the state has subpoena power and can immediately obtain third-party records, like from Google and Verizon for instance, that could easily get at the truth of the matter and refute a defendant’s claims—that is, if their claims are untrue.

This is why if a defendant is truly guilty, it’s ill-advised to pursue a third-party culpability defense because it can easily be shot down. Particularly such a targeted and precise third party culpability defense as Read’s.

This theory of defense, however, would be pursued by an individual who cares more about justice—say, for their loved one—and about exonerating herself.

A guilty person cares more about getting off. An innocent person cares more about the truth.

The state has the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. So, why would a defendant who’s guilty pursue a theory of defense that essentially shifts this burden when they only have to raise reasonable doubt? Hint: they wouldn’t.

The Commonwealth’s case against Karen Read has enough reasonable doubt to drive a Mack truck through it—and that’s an understatement.

Karen Read appears to be a smart woman. Do you really think if she were at all guilty she would pursue a theory that the state could easily disprove? The state can’t even prove their OWN case, as is—of course she wouldn’t!

If Karen Read were truly guilty, why would she be asking, practically begging, the state to hand over evidence that would incriminate her?

Probably because they know it wouldn’t incriminate her. And/or probably because they know it would incriminate others.

And if she were truly guilty, and the evidence would incriminate her, then why has the state, at every turn, fought against turning over the evidence?

In fact, they’ve even gone great lengths to sabotage or avoid getting Court-ordered evidence, by sending improper preservation letters or asking Ring Security how long their data is stored in their systems (90 days) so they could intentionally run out the clock and file a search warrant for the system nearly a year later so this data would forever be lost, for instance.

These actions appear to reflect overwhelming Brady violations (withholding of exculpatory evidence) by the state.

The Touhy evidence, however, will likely recuperate many of these discrepancies—recovering much of this withheld, “lost”, sabotaged, or “destroyed” exculpatory evidence.

The Feds didn’t turn over 3,000+ pages of nothing-burgers! This will be BIG! And the Commonwealth only has themselves to thank for they’ve made their own beds.

Just a reminder, The DOJ informed DA Michael Morrissey’s Office that:

“Based on my understanding from that discussion with USA Levy, his office has a very different opinion of the circumstances in this case than as presented in Mr. Morrissey's letter.”

Do the actions of DA Michael Morrissey’s Office, or The Commonwealth, reflect a prosecution that cares more about getting at the truth of the matter—getting justice for Officer #JohnOKeefe, who was so callously murdered, or trying to confirm their bias in their attempts to prove their case against #KarenRead?

What evidence are you most eager to see?

#JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonMA #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

[Maura Jones @MauraDarcyJones]

🤣

[Barstool Sports @barstoolsports]

Explaining to your dad how to open Peacock for the millionth time

[Anna Stokke @rastokke]

There are people who are naturally more quick at picking up math concepts. I know this. I've seen it over and over again. Giving novice learners problems w/o first providing instruction will highlight students who are quick or have prior knowledge. Others will likely be lost and feel unsuccessful. So don't bill productive struggle as some sort of equity-based teaching method. It's the opposite.

[𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐝 𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐧 @DrBradJohnson]

We spend millions to implement research based practices. BUT, we ignore the extensive research that shows how play, recess, & physical activity, can improve focus, self regulation, and on task behavior, as well as academic achievement, interpersonal skills & mental health.

[𝙻𝚊𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚂𝚔𝚊𝚒𝚏𝚎-𝙺𝚗𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 💙 @laura_skaife]

My first blog of 2024.

Read it here #TeamOrkney ➡️ https://t.co/ax217kNvN4

@DrBradJohnson #kindness #KindnessMatters

[Coach Downs @TripD34]

Play the hand you’re dealt like it was the one you always wanted 🤔💯

[Eric Hunley @hunleyeric]

I posted earlier about the Bass Pro Guy in the aquarium and had some laughs. Then. @lawtubejunkies shared this with me. I have deleted my earlier post as I don't wish to be cruel.