Is it possible a candidate supported by #leftists in #Hollywood & #NewYork is compatible with #Texas values? Nope.. & he won't win in Texas unless voters have lost their minds. Not likely.
Dd you know that if you get a phone call for #Beto in #Texas, it may come from a #leftist#NY phone bank? Yep, my daughter was invited to join such a phone bank in #LongIsland,& to help host a #Beto event IN LONG ISLAND.
Yes, my two daughters (who haven't lived in #Texas for well over decade, have gotten involved in #Hollywood & #NY#leftist campaigns for #Beto, as f this HLPS him in Texas.
#FoxNews (ridiculed them) had #
Texas as a "battleground" state shortly before 2016 election. #Trump won by comfortable 9%. Now Fox has #Beto within 3% & closing. No chance. #Fox#poll (LOL).
I ridiculed #Beto stunt to my friend at time (before I know he was running for #Senate), & I still do ridicule Beto, along with #media saying he has major chance in #Texas.
#Beto & this #GOP "congressman did a 1600 mile "road trip" streamed on #SocialMedia from within a single car, w/o sleeping (LOL), from #Texas to D.C. as dishonest #Beto prepared to run as #Obama-type "inspirational" (though non-minority,, unlike #Cruz) "mew" type of politician.
A female friend (hey, I have one) breathlessly told me how #Beto & a "moderate" #GOP congressman were doing a STUNT on #SocialMedia.I rolled my eyes.
Yes, ANY "average" (even of arbitrary guesses) reduces MAXIMUM possible error. That is nature of averaging. But that does not mean average is more ACCURATE than any individual guess--which may be exactly right while averaging in wrong guesses makes average wrong.
What does "average" of #polls hyped by #sociopaths of #media really mean? That media kNOWS/ADMITS that each individual poll is fallible estimate. LIE i that "average" add accuracy.
Actually saw one "respected" #media organization say (as to AVERAGE of #polls): "There is no #MartinOfError," w/o saying why not: because NO #mathematical basis to determine "accuracy" of AVERAGE.
Doubt me? Never do that. #FoxNews almost obsessively (when not hyping, as #sociopaths do, own poll) refers to #RealClearPolitics (total fraud) average of polls. NO #scientific or #mathematical basis for saying AVERAGE of fallible #polls is more accurate than any individual poll.
#Polls are not "#news", except to #media#sociopaths. They are fallible ESTIMATES of opinion based on fallible sample of 1,000 or so people whose professed (not #vote) opinion is extrapolated to represent opinion of up to MILLIONS of people.
Yes, POSSIBLE error in any #poll is 50% to almost 100%, even if "sample" group is scientifically chosen from among non-skewed (as when #AlffLandon predicted to defeat #FDR from telephone poll when only "rich" had phone)