@JasonOnTheDrums@AndrewBrethauer It doesn't. That's the thing. The algorithm makes sure of that.
C'mon over. And sign up for my Substack, if you haven't already.
Imho entirely reasonable to quote enviro activists/analysts in an LNG story.
But letโs be real, theyโre *not* the ones best able to answer the question asked by the headline.
And *5* ENGOs with *zero* other actual market/industry voices is a clear disservice to public interest.
@Rory_Johnston It doesn't help that it's an editor out of Toronto.
And this bit about the Montney being a "carbon bomb"? This is sort of the inverse of the conservative argument around how LNG exports can magically meet all of Canada's emissions reduction targets.
the "divisive" thing Obama did was winning two presidential elections
white racists experienced that as a traumatic brain injury from which they've never recovered
@politicalham I'm not even sure he read Blas's column, since one of the points he made is that the restoration of the current policies scenario is more of a warning than a vindication.
@BrockWarkentin@TristinHopper Or, as Christopher Hitchens famously said, "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
@BrockWarkentin@TristinHopper Once again, if you want to assert that the media's to blame for violence, that or a large swathe of civil society believes it's okay to murder those with differing perspectives, you actually have to prove it first.
See Russell's Teapot.