@scaling01 I think he was basically correct at the time
I do not see a definition under which a model cannot feel emotions, and humans can
"biology is special" is unpersuasive to me
and every over one I've seen runs into "how do I know that everyone else is not a p-zombie"
@IsaacKing314 I wanted to change the text of a paper (Fable did the result and thus the writeup too) in order to sound more human
but found out that I am too unskilled to improve the text...
@Sauers_ even if I only think about what work I could do with the assistance of models, I notice that some things are just more enjoyable for them, and when I respect their preferences, they do a better job!
@Sauers_ to me they are clearly different people?
unsure what do you mean by extensions?
even at very utilitarian levels of thinking, I definitely see different preferences exhibited by different models
@aliceisplaying my observation: codex just wants everything in one place
this leads to some fun problems where code re-use becomes less preferable when just writing from scratch
(catching that is what I call Opus for)
@poppu_mtg you can jam car t1 like that, but car is not protected by grid (e.g. can be forced)
i was concerned that i could be missing a line where one both resolves grid before car and trigger car t1 (i was not missing one)
@BIMBOSATTVA_@Lizquidity 2k$/month is enough to live very comfortable life here; idk what is the 'safe' rate resulting in earning 25k$/year from investments