PulseChain Believers. This message is for you.
They didn’t get 60.
That’s the headline the rest of crypto will cry about for a week.
PulseChain didn’t need the vote.
No Senate seat shipped the in-wallet swap.
No committee burned the fees.
No lobbyist built the rails, the gas tank, or the privacy stack.
We already fought the SEC in court and won. That’s more “clarity” than a 600-page bill that couldn’t even get a debate.
Washington just told the industry it still wants permission. Fine. Let them wait in the lobby.
If you were only here for a press release from Congress, you were never here.
If you needed a senator to tell you this chain is real, you were never going to hold through the next red candle either.
Believers already know the play:
The product is live.
The fees go back into the bird.
The bridge is open.
The calendar still has Sept 20.
Bills slip. Builders don’t.
Stay on the train. Let the permission crowd write the eulogies.
#PulseChain #PLS #HEX #LibertySwap
@ArcRaidersInfo Had fun today after not playing for 2 months until…… shot in the back with a loaded inventory, didn’t even get mad just switched to Crimson Dessert
⚠️ Someone just posted a GitLab issue claiming PulseChain has a serious unpatched vulnerability that lets attackers permanently bloat the network. We dug into it. It doesn't hold up.
(original post/thread for context - https://t.co/MJQdCEsQkf)
✍️ tl;dr for below? AI slop 'bug bounty' attempt, Opus 4.8 has picked it a,part below.
1/ The report says go-pulse v3.3.0 is "missing three upstream patches" from Ethereum: EIP-8032, EIP-8038, EIP-7612.
Problem: all three are still drafts. They're proposals for a future Ethereum upgrade. Ethereum mainnet doesn't have them either. You can't be missing patches that don't exist yet.
2/ One of them (EIP-7612) isn't even a fix for the problem described — it's the long-term plan to eventually replace Ethereum's entire state structure with Verkle Trees. Citing it as a "missing patch" misrepresents what it is.
3/ The core claim is that an attacker can write junk data to the chain, and even after they delete it, it stays on every node's hard drive forever — slowly killing performance.
This was true of old Ethereum software. It was fixed in geth v1.13 (Sept 2023) with a new storage system called PathDB. Geth v1.14 made it the default.
4/ On 1 Oct 2025, @RichardHeartWin announced Go-Pulse v3.3.0 rebased from geth v1.13.13 to v1.16.3 — inheriting every state-management improvement Ethereum has shipped since.
5/ We had Claude repeatedly check the actual go-pulse source code to be certain. In core/rawdb/accessors_trie.go, the ParseStateScheme function explicitly defaults new nodes to PathDB:
"State schema set to default, scheme: path"
PulseChain didn't override the upstream default. The fix is active.
6/ The "proof of concept" code in the report actually has to manually force the old storage method (rawdb.HashScheme) to make the bug appear. A real v3.3.0 node doesn't use that method by default. The PoC is essentially demonstrating a bug in software no one runs.
7/ The underlying idea — that you can spam a blockchain with junk data to slow it down — is real and well known. It applies to every EVM chain, including Ethereum. PulseChain is no more vulnerable than mainnet.
8/ Bottom line: theoretical attack dressed up with scary-sounding invented terminology ("STATE-NURGLE") and citations to draft proposals as if they were missing fixes.