@Chloe_the_peach@ItzzDak @COorBust @DavidSacks@wholemars It has to be methodically proven that declining the deal is in the shareholders best interest, which I’m skeptical of. You have your opinion and that’s fine. At minimum it’s a PR nightmare.
@mikejwhelan@bubbawatson@Jumpman23 Star was making cards in 1984 & 1985 which are definitely iconic and awesome cards if you’re sure they’re authentic. However Star was just regional and available in certain markets, that’s why the Fleer card is considered his rookie. That 1986 set itself has a lot of killers
@mikejwhelan@bubbawatson@Jumpman23 You’re correct his rookie year was 1984. There was a few gap years in basketball manufacturing in the 80’s. 1986-1987 Fleer became official licensed card manufacturer for the NBA. So even though his rookie year was 1984, the 1986 fleer card is considered his rookie due to gap.
@COorBust @DavidSacks@wholemars In addition, not sure why folks wouldn’t want someone like Elon who believes in freedom of speech and freedom of ideology not to have control of the company. He would do much better running the company than communist Jack Dorsey and the left.
@COorBust @DavidSacks@wholemars It’s simple, any twitter shareholder can sue the board for breach of financial duty to shareholders. He’s offering a significant amount above market value, and declining would cause significant damage to any shareholders and of course the stock price.