EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE, ORIGINAL PUBLISHING OR SHARING OTHERS WRITINGS OR FILM IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. EVERYTHING IS ENTIRELY WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
@AmericaOnlyBro I don’t agree his face was emotionless, I’m certain he was fighting to hold back a wee grin. He was so excited by it all, but pretended to do his best to hold it back.
That cunt needs arrested.
This is what an umbilical cord is supposed to look like..🩷
White. Limp. Translucent.
Because its mission is complete.
Every last drop of cord blood has been delivered to the baby - as designed.
But that’s not what usually happens.
In most hospitals, the cord is clamped and cut within seconds.
The baby cries, the team moves fast, and parents are told “it’s routine.”
No one stops to ask…
What was in that cord?
And where did it go?
Let’s break it down:
Cord blood is not extra.
It’s loaded with:
🩸 Up to ⅓ of your baby’s total blood volume
🧠 Oxygen to protect the brain
🛡️ Immune cells to prevent infection
💪 Iron to prevent anemia
💉 STEM CELLS to repair and build tissue, organs, and immunity.
This isn’t waste.
It’s a biological treasure.
So ask yourself… why is it clamped early?
Why are we told the cord is useless after birth, when the baby hasn’t even received all of what’s theirs?
And here’s the darker truth:
💰 That cord blood is worth thousands on the market
💰 The placenta is sold for stem cell research, vaccine development, skincare, cosmetics, and Big Pharma products
💰 Entire biotech companies are built on the lie that your baby’s leftovers are “medical waste”
But the parents?
They’re left in the dark.
Told it’s “no big deal.”
Told it’s just discarded.
While behind the scenes, someone else cashes in.
This system isn’t broken.
It was built this way.
But THIS photo shows what happens when you don’t comply.
When you wait.
When you let the birth unfold as it was designed.
When the baby receives all of their blood. Their protection. Their power.
This is the kind of image that makes people uncomfortable…
Because it exposes what most have never questioned.
But once you see it…
You can’t unsee it.
“SEE IT."
#TruthBeTold
But we "can't afford the state pension".
The state pension makes up about 10% of UK public spending.
That extra payment earmarked for foreign aid is about 1.5% of public spending.
Shouldn't we be aiding our own people first?
I bet we could find other examples of UK taxpayer money being squandered on non British citizens that could be spent on British people in Britain. Wars in Ukraine and the Middle East? Asylum seeker accommodation? NHS treatment for non citizens? Benefits for non citizens? Efficiency savings in the civil service? An end to final salary linked pensions in the public sector?
All of that would comfortably pay for the state pension.
It's not that we can't afford the state pension. Politicians have just decided pensioners are not their priority. Foreign aid, foreign wars, fat pensions for public sector workers, benefits for non Brits, are all more important, apparently.
Last week this utter bastard released a statement about 12 "terror suspects" being arrested for "anti-muslim" hate.
He declared that "lives had been saved" by the prompt actions of the security forces/police.
London Mayor, Sad Dick Khan, echoed @Keir_Starmer's sentiments.
In reality the arrested people were just flying a drone over a gathering of several thousand Muslims at an event organised by a group who have been outlawed in several Islamic states for their own links to terrorism.
No crime was committed. No crime was EVER going to be committed. There was absolutely no danger whatsoever to the attendees.
But these facts didn't stop Bastard Starmer from claiming a major terrorist plot had been foiled.
Subsequently all 12 of the "terrorists" have now been released uncharged.
There was NEVER a terror plot. Starmer knew this.
Has he issued an update? An apology?
Has he hell.
@Keir_Starmer is an utter bastard. Pass it on.
The UK is increasing the Pension age to 68.
Poland has lowered theirs to 60 for women and 65 for men.
Their pension provides a better standard of living too.
(Oh and in case you are wondering how it can be afforded the Polish Government privatised very little.)
Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along!
Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.”
They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying.
I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself.
What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude.
Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.”
To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few:
THE OTHER GUNMAN
An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case.
He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up.
DISPATCH AUDIO
911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.”
DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE
The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.”
DNA DISCREPANCIES
Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle.
INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS
During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment.
THE UNFIRED BULLET
During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was.
ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO
Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom.
As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims.
Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.”
As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture.
Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones.
And… exhale.
These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk.
What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions.
Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice.
This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people.
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
Mikki Willis
Investigative Filmmaker
@Rab_Dickson1 I only watched it hoping they got pumped oot. Then I felt sorry for the team, it’s not their fault their media and majority supporters are arrogant arseholes.