@NiftyNick4 Imagine taking the day off to hear about city lol, not to mention the process has already been laid out that the sanctions will be announced after the appeal process and that will take up to 12 weeks
@TouchlineX Fuck around and found it, you play with fire expect to be burned can’t cry about it knowing what the risks are he decided to do what he did knowing the people he was gonna deal with if he was scared for his life maybe don’t hack people then
@Lord_Sugar Are you stupid to say you’re a lord i very confused you don’t understand the process spurs accepted wrongdoing hence why spurs got a punishment straight away. City are claiming complete innocence hence why they are waiting for the appeal as they are not accepting wrongdoing.
@JacobsBen Rivals fans thinking the FA making a comment is a big thing lol they can’t do anything unless they open there own separate investigation which again will take years before they can do anything people need to understand what separation entity’s mean.
@UtdxJJ Yeah you’re a United fan and just said you will never watch the league again so find a new sport nfl, basketball, rugby something because city will not be going down
@nat_Mothas They don’t it’s in the appendix which hasn’t fully been released if you think differently and you know why then tell me I would love to hear
@Dunkgrin the owner cannot be made to sell can he if he hasn’t done any wrongdoing which the panel has said he didn’t have any idea what was happening the only people who will be told to go is the current board you may not like that but that’s what the panel said the owner isn’t guilty
@Dunkgrin So you just completely ignored that I was talking about the owner and moved on to something else lol the panel cleared the owner and that’s all I was talking about not any evidence
@richard1999jon1 So again let’s wait and see if city have got documents and payslip and they aren’t fake then city will win the argument if the documents or payslips say ADUG then yeah city are guilty
@richard1999jon1 Again wrong the sponsor was always Etihad it’s that the panel is saying ADUG paid etihad that then paid city which is illegal. However city’s argument is ADUG didn’t pay Etihad it was the UAE governed which is legal and they have got documents and payslip showing this
@Dunkgrin Well yeah the panel are saying he had no idea his Money was going into the sponsors so they are saying the owner is innocent read the file first before commenting things you don’t know
@richard1999jon1 For example Arsenal get a lot of money through sponsors that are from other governments it isn’t illegal and it doesn’t make them state owned, city are saying this is the same hope that helps
@richard1999jon1 What do you not understand seriously the prem have got no rules on who the sponsors get funding off unless it’s the owners of the club or his assets the sponsors can get the money off whoever they like just not mansour which city are arguing so again you have got no idea