The First rule of the Means Test is that *We do not talk about the Means Test*. I report and block ALL spam/thirst traps (which is why I have no followers).
@Sue_ellena This is close, but not quite right. Scott Galloway probably personally desires that Elon be killed, but he didn't say the words to make it happen. He said the words to be outrageous, because outrage is the social currency of liberalism. It's how you "prove" you're one of them.
A woman published Stephen Miller's home address.
The stated goal was to put a target on a sitting White House official and his family.
The Democratic DA in Arlington just announced she won't prosecute.
Her reason?
It might have a "chilling effect on political protest."
In other words β doxxing Trump officials is now protected speech.
Remember that next time they lecture you about democracy. πΊπΈ
@micsolana@bdomenech Let me put it this way: if I were to say that Scott is threatening the life of Elon Musk, and that people whose lives are threatened have the right to kill their aggressors in self defense, Scott would not be confused about my implication.
I don't think I've heard nearly as many jokes about the JFK assassination as I have about the Charlie Kirk assassination, even with a 62-year head start.
It's simply delusional to characterize Musk as anticompetitive.
His entire MO, for every single company, is to challenge entrenched incumbents that haven't been forced to innovate in decades.
In every case, he's up against companies with more market share, more capital, and more cash.
"Boy books are important" was my immediate conclusion.
Like... there are any number of stories we had to read that I found boring or pointless, that I'm sure the third-grade girls loved.
I just like... got over it? It never occurred to me to dub the works problematic.
@jeremiahrogers@DutchAlchemist I love that half the comments think you're attacking Elon and half think you're stroking him.
I misread your initial comment as "Have fun going deep" and was confused about what you were trying to say. So it seems to me you've been pretty even-handed here?
This shouldn't be unexpected in a well-functioning world, but it seems noteworthy that not only were the mid-term elections held, but they were administered without major incident, and the lopsided results are apparently not being questioned by those on the losing side of it.