@traderpodcaste you also bucketed on VIX open, which is endogenous to regime — "calm-open fridays bounce, stressed-open fridays keep falling" isn't an insight, it's the definition of the buckets. that's the stats crime, not the algo stuff.
@traderpodcaste@JeffConcerto "descriptive" doesn't save you when you narrate a trend off it. "real bleed shows up later in the week" is a directional claim. your low bucket is n=19 with no dispersion, the high bucket trend you're implying is n=9, panic is n=3. you can't read a VIX *path* off 3 events durr
@TRFletcher@traderpodcaste@TheShortBear these kinds of posts make me want to sell a bad stats service to traders who don't know better instead of taking their money the old fashioned way
@WealthChainPro@PeterSchiff idk why you take it personally. theres a million things to trade. your statement that "long term bitcoin keeps going higher" is objectively false by most definitions. maybe it goes up more maybe it doesn't but you're speaking like a novice.
@WealthChainPro@PeterSchiff what about anything? i'm just pointing out the reality doesn't line up with analysis that it keeps going up long term. its going sideways for almost half its existence.
@BreakTheCurse7@conductr_ so if you zoom in (dont even have to really), you can tell the art is ai generated because it's not actually locked to the implied pixel art grid. there's artifacts that are smaller than the implied grid so it reads as messy. compare to these where the pixels read crisp
@louiswharmby@ClaudeDevs its just pulling from training data. just tell it to estimate how long something will take, it says 2 days, it does it in 5 minutes, thats when you tell it to compare how long it took to how long it said it would take and remind it + add it to claude.md context
@JoshStrat1@UncleBugatti@skelton_apex@ApexTradeFund they do minor rug pulls every year or so. they'll cash in while adding restrictions, the crowd gets too wild, eventually they will "hear" us and fix it with apex 4.0 and make it sound like it was all to weed out back actors.
@KISSscalper @Mousewrangler2@om_patel5 i look for signals on small sample sizes but i run 15 years tick data for lower time frame candidates that should be regime-independent
@leecronin Most humans can't be fooled into thinking they're conscious, and if they could, it would undermine your point about humans thinking deeper than the things fooling them. Overall incoherent slop post designed as a vehicle to pat yourself on the back for recognizing LLM limitations.