@RockyPsionics@prinsvalie@BS645@ek_rugby Well I think we’ve learnt the extent of your vocabulary…. I count 5 times you used the word “thick”… how obtuse are you…😂
@prinsvalie@RockyPsionics@BS645@ek_rugby Also what he leaves out is the fact that a lot of New Zealand’s registered players play off shore i.e., not eligible for AB selection.
@prinsvalie@RockyPsionics@BS645@ek_rugby 🤣🤣🤣 this guy reckons he’s onto something… probably preparing a 5 word thesis to submit to Edinburgh… he’ll have to explain why that logic falls flat with France though…
@v_freedman@rekoil92 The purpose of this list is to show the current winning streak you idiot… any losses were prior.. you thick are you Bok hating knuckleheads.
@RopaingTamack2@rekoil92 OMG.. you kidding right… can one person be so stupid…did you see the “date from” both those losses were prior you idiot! 🤣🤦♂️
@RockyPsionics@BS645@ek_rugby 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don’t even know what to respond to that other than… Okay… I believe you.. go play with your legos now so the grownups can talk…
@danabrahmsen@Dreamchaser4132@RadioRaps@ek_rugby That’s a bit of a nothing statement. 🤣🤣
I provided context around the law as it is currently. You’re conflating what the law actually says versus whether it’s the fairest or safest way. Those are different discussions. I actually think a law change is probably on the cards…
@moi_pseudo@RadioRaps@ek_rugby Likely so…I can name 100 things that are somewhat unfair in rugby. But the law as it stands today says nothing other than you can lift and ensure the players is placed down safely. It’s very open to interpretation. I dare say a law change is on the cards soon.
@danabrahmsen@Dreamchaser4132@RadioRaps@ek_rugby Exactly right… the law doesn’t provide that absolutely. It’s up for interpretation which the officials on the day obviously did. So many argue that the move was illegal, but it wasn’t the law requires 1. Safety first, 2. Down “as soon as” … very open isn’t it?