I Prefer My 💉 AEs Med. Rare 🥩

I prefer my 💉 Adverse Events (AEs) medium rare 🥩 | Sometimes satirical on the surface, but always serious about informed consent and bodily autonomy

[I Prefer My 💉 AEs Med. Rare 🥩 @MediumRareAEs]

I like my 💉 AEs medium rare 🥩

Blood clots 🩸 to start, then a VITT main topped w/ myocarditis ❤️ and a stroke 🧠 on the side, and death ☠️ for dessert

Compliments to the chefs 👨‍🍳: @pfizer @BioNTech_Group @moderna_tx @AstraZeneca @JNJCares

Mega Thread 🧵 👇 ...

1/x

[Shaun Rickard @ShaunRickard67]

Previous record crushed - Almost 350K signatures right now

Petition is open until Dec. 24th, so 500K is very achievable, sign now if you haven't done so already, let's do this! https://t.co/knjBN9qyep

*Repost to keep this going and follow @mferreriptbokaw for updates

[Died Suddenly @DiedSuddenly_]

Ontario man files $35.6 million lawsuit against Pfizer over son’s vaccine death - Go get 'em @Answers4Sean!

New Tecumseth, ON, resident Dan Hartman has initiated a wrongful death lawsuit against Pfizer because his son Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine.

“On the morning of September 27, 2021, 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, Sean Hartman was found deceased in his bedroom by his mother,” said Sheikh Law lawyer Umar Sheikh in a court filing.

“The Plaintiff pleads that Sean Hartman died as a result of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.”

Dan was denied money from the Vaccine Injury Support Program in March despite Sean dying after getting the COVID-19 vaccine.

“My son died 33 days after his first Pfizer vaccine and he was a perfectly healthy boy with no underlying conditions,” he said.

He took a COVID-19 vaccine to be allowed to play hockey. Dan said he took him to the emergency room four days after his first dose because he had brown circles around his eyes, a rash on his face and pain in his right shoulder.

American pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole determined in July Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine.

READ MORE: WATCH: American pathologist determines Ontario boy died from COVID vaccine

Cole examined his tissues, finding spike protein in his adrenal glands.

“The adrenal glands control your blood pressure, so if Sean’s blood pressure dropped, he would have died,” said Dan.

Dan is seeking $35.6 million in damages; specialized damages to be determined prior to the trial; prejudgment and post-judgment interest; the costs of the proceeding, including all applicable taxes; and further relief the court considers just.

Sheikh said Pfizer “owed a duty of care to Sean Hartman to accurately inform him of all risks associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.” He added he owed him a duty to warn him of the risks associated with the safety and efficacy of these vaccines.

When it comes to the standard of care, Dan pleaded Pfizer breached it for the manufacturing, testing, sale, reporting and administration of its vaccines.

With the standard of care, Sheikh alleged it was breached when it disregarded and misrepresented the results of the safety trials by providing an incorrect characterization of the efficacy data; discounting results of adverse events on vaccinated people in the study; not highlighting all results and adverse events revealed in the studies conducted; and not stopping their administration on Canadians due to known safety concerns.

Dan pleaded Pfizer negligently misrepresented the safety of the vaccine and did not disclose the risks associated with it, which include but are not limited to myocarditis and pericarditis.

The particulars include failing to disclose people under 40 years old had an increased risk of myocarditis after taking the vaccine, rates of myocarditis were higher in adolescent males, inadequate testing was performed to ensure their safety and efficacy, failing to complete post-market surveillance and inform the Canadian government and the public of the results, failing to disclose the issues with the vaccine, and failing to identify, implement, and verify procedures to address post-market surveillance risks.

He accused Pfizer of improper product distribution when it was being sold. This is because the foreseeable risks exceeded the benefits associated with the product, it was more dangerous than ordinary consumers would expect, it did not have adequate, effective warnings and instructions over these dangers, inadequate testing and it was unfit for the purpose for which it was intended.

Sheikh concluded by saying Pfizer “concealed the fact the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination had severe possible risks and outcomes when administered, including but not limited to myocarditis, pericarditis and death, to the public, healthcare providers, and regulatory authorities, including Health Canada.”

“The Plaintiff pleads that the wrongful death of his son Sean Hartman was caused by the negligence of the Defendant,” he said.

https://t.co/irQtQkYZ3Y

[Shaun Rickard @ShaunRickard67]

*Share this post widely.

Open letter to, @PierrePoilievre, @LeslynLewis, @MelissaLantsman, @Roman_Baber, @RachaelThomasMP and et al @CPC_HQ - A public response is respectfully requested.

My co-applicant, Karl Harrison & myself, Brian Peckford, Maxime Bernier, Nabil Ben Naoum and 6 million of our fellow Canadians would like to know if at any point you plan to finally stand up in the HoC to speak up and publicly address our landmark lawsuit against Justin Trudeau's heinous and vindictive vaccine travel mandates?

Our ongoing lawsuit is one of the most important legal challenges in recent Canadian history. The Canadian legacy media have been ordered to never report on it, under any circumstances, despite all of the bombshell evidence which was uncovered by our legal teams during the cross examinations of 16 of the government's very own medical experts and senior public health officials, which exposed the Trudeau Government's lies regarding their fabricated reasons/rationales for invoking said mandates.

We are currently potentially facing unprecedented judicial injustice due to the blatant biases and partisanship of our seemingly heavily compromised and skewed so called 'justice system', yet all of you at the CPC continue to hide in the shadows and remain silent on this very serious and important issue, and we'd like to know why?

I would hazard a guess that at least one of you observed the proceedings via Zoom, or at the very least had someone attend on your behalf to watch and report back to you with a summary. If this was in fact the case, your response would be very much appreciated, or at the very least it might act as a show of good faith and acknowledgement to the 6 million Canadians who's lives and livelihoods were heavily impacted and negatively affected by Trudeau's tyrannical, 100% unscientific, and as our evidentiary record cleary demonstrates, nothing more than politically motivated mandates.

You all have an opportunity to do the right thing here and prove once and for all to ALL Canadians that you care and are in fact supportive of fighting for and protecting Canadians charter rights, should you choose to do so.

We await your response - Thank you.
FYI: On Wednesday October 11th, 2023 our lawsuit broke a Canadian record for the largest number of people ever registering to watch a Federal Court of Appeal hearing. The Court Zoom team confirmed that 19,000+ Canadians had registered to watch the hearing live.

SUMMARY OF OUR RECENT HEARING IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL IN OTTAWA

Travel Vaccine Mandate Challengers in Court to Contest Previous Mootness Ruling.

"Challengers to the now-repealed travel vaccine mandate pleaded before the Federal Court of Appeal on Oct. 11 to overturn a previous court decision declaring their case was moot.

Four different groups of appellants made their case in front of a panel of three judges, each taking various approaches to challenge the previous ruling made by Justice Jocelyne Gagné in October last year.

Quebec lawyer Nabil Ben Naoum, who represents himself, sought to impress upon the appeal judges what it meant to not be vaccinated during the mandate period from October 2021 to June 2022.

He argued that those who didn’t receive a COVID-19 vaccine were captive within Canada due to planes, trains, and commercial passenger marine vessels being off-limits. The U.S. also blocked access to non-vaccinated travellers at that time.

The only way for unvaccinated Canadians to leave the country was to "paddle in a row boat across the ocean," said Mr. Ben Naoum. He added that this “sub-class” of unvaccinated citizens was akin to Cubans under Fidel Castro.

Mr. Ben Naoum also asked how the government could withhold fundamental human rights, hand them back at the eleventh hour, and then claim the issue is moot and shouldn't be examined by the court.

The federal travel vaccine mandate was lifted on June 20, 2022, and eight days later the attorney general (AG) filed a mootness motion in order for the cases not to be heard by the court.

Justice Gagné essentially agreed with all the arguments presented by the government. She declared that the applicants had “substantially received the remedies sought,” given the mandate had been repealed.

This issue of there being no public interest is an angle that was tackled by the counsels representing other parties in the mandate challenge in order to question Justice Gagné’s ruling. There is therefore “no live controversy to adjudicate,” she wrote. “There is no important public interest or inconsistency in the law that would justify allocating significant judicial resources to hear these moot Applications. ”'Significant' Public Interest

Other parties include businessmen Karl Harrison and Shaun Rickard, who were the first to file a challenge to the mandate in December 2021, PPC Leader Maxime Bernier, and former Newfoundland premier Brian Peckford and co-applicants.

Attorney Sam Presvelos, representing Mr. Harrison and Mr. Rickard, pleaded that Justice Gagné had made three errors in her decision, including that she did not consider the “significant” public interest in the judicial applications.

Justice George Locke, who was presiding the hearing, asked to clarify whether Mr. Presvelos wanted him to accept that Justice Gagné made her ruling without having the public interest in mind. “How could that be?” he asked.

Mr. Presvelos pointed to Justice Gagné’s decision, which said the “important public interest” is “alleged.”

Mr. Presvelos argued that the case is larger than the rights of the appellants or the general public who remained unvaccinated, which numbers in the millions.

He said he believes that Canadians would be “very interested” to know whether or not a medical procedure could be imposed as a condition to access federally regulated services.

Allison Peijovic, a lawyer with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms representing Mr. Bernier and Mr. Peckford, centred her arguments around jurisprudence on the issue of mootness, established in Borowski v Canada (AG) in 1989.

Challengers want the court to determine whether the imposition of the travel mandate was constitutional, given the impacts on mobility rights and the security of the person as it pertains to bodily autonomy. She argued that Justice Gagné did not fully analyze her clients’ applications against that jurisprudence, which addresses issues of whether a live controversy between parties remains.

Constitutionality

Ms. Peijovic remarked that her client Mr. Peckford is the only living signatory of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He attested that the interim orders implementing the mandate violated his charter rights.
Ms. Peijovic said the court must pronounce itself on the matter, otherwise, Canadians remain in “limbo.” If they don’t know where the court stands on the lawfulness of the mandate, she said some are wondering whether they should move out of Canada.
She said the appellants want to know whether their freedom to leave Canada is conditional on taking a novel medication still undergoing testing.

COVID-19 vaccines were brought to market under special authorization without having gone through full clinical trials. Pfizer also used different processes to manufacture the product that was used in clinical trials and the one that was widely distributed across the world.

Justice Canada senior general counsel J. Sanderson Graham assured the Federal Court of Appeal that no errors were made in this case.

Mr. Graham agreed with the appellants’ argument that the government has left open the door to bring back mandates in response to circumstances, but he said the court could not “engage in speculation” or pass judgement on speculation. “We can only look at what happened,” he said, and the measures were repealed.
Because of that, there are no live controversies, said Mr. Graham, and the function of the court is to decide “real disputes” that affect the rights of individuals.

He said that Justice Gagné was right in her interpretation of Borowski and the economy of judicial resources. There is no tangible relief that can be provided to the applicants, he said.

If the panel of judges, which Justices George Locke, Nathalie Goyette, and René Leblanc, sides with the appellants, the case will be sent back down to federal court to be heard. If it upholds the mootness ruling, appellants could decide to go to the Supreme Court.

Appellants want to have their day in court, having collected thousands of pages of evidence from government witnesses and experts, on everything from the approval process for vaccines in Canada to ethical considerations being applied before imposing a mandate.

The evidence collected shows that the Transport Canada official in charge of crafting the travel mandate policy had not considered whether it was ethical to implement it. There was also no recommendation of public health authorities to impose a mandate, said the official during cross-examination."

Noé Chartier
Author

Noé Chartier is a senior reporter with the Canadian edition of The Epoch Times. Twitter:
@NChartierET

#canpoli #onpoli @CTVNews @CP24 @CBCNews @globalnews @nationalpost @globeandmail @TheTorontoSun @Harry__Faulkner @brianlilley @CityNewsTO

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

‘The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the United States government’

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

BREAKING:

New research reveals 57 fold increase in miscarriages & 38 fold increase in still births & foetal deaths after covid mRNA jabs

‘The greatest violation of medical ethics & humanity ever’ says leading obstetrician.

This is truly horrific

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

Good morning America.

We were lied to, coerced, gaslighted and lives destroyed as a result. It’s time for those responsible to be held accountable. Share far and wide. Ultimately it’s the truth that will redeem the world from hell 👊

[Roman Baber @Roman_Baber]

No conspiracy theories, but everyday Canadians injured by the vaccine.

They are not anti-vaxxers. They are patients who are entitled to reporting, medical aid & compensation.

The time for conversation about vax injuries in the media is finally here.
https://t.co/5K46TmN5xy

[Marty Makary MD, MPH @MartyMakary]

New Study: "cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination... Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis." https://t.co/L4ciyWbgec

[Juno News @junonewscom]

BBREAKING: Canada lifts all Covid border requirements for travellers entering Canada as of Oct.1.

Mandated use of ArriveCan and all other federal quarantine and isolation requirements will also drop. The mask mandate for planes and trains has also been suspended.

[Roman Baber @Roman_Baber]

.@cityoftoronto deleted a video which suggested a child who is not vaccinated against c-19 may be unable to play outside with their friends.

Let the record again reflect that it's governments & Public Health that have been engaging in misinformation. We need a judicial inquiry!

[Cristian Terhes MEP @CristianTerhes]

"If we wait for those data to emerge in human data, not just mice data, we will be using what I would consider to be a potentially outdated vaccine", said Dr. Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director. Woud you trust such a medial product that was not previously tested in humans?

[Vesta @Vesta26728800]

I am a dual degree small business owner. I rely on science everyday to do my job. I work hard and I am a respected contributor in my community. But according to PM Trudeau, “I am a misogynist who doesn’t believe in science”, for resisting to be experimented on. #TrudeauMustGo

[Theo Fleury @TheoFleury14]

I’m a 54 year old father of four, ex professional athlete SC Champ and Olympic gold medalist who has worked in the field of trauma, mental health & addiction for the last 14 years helping people heal from trauma & #TrudeauMustGo thinks I’m an extremist who needs to be dealt with.

[Danielle Smith @ABDanielleSmith]

I'm an educated & independent woman running to be Premier of Alberta, but because I believe no Canadian should be discriminated against for refusing a COVID vaccine, according to @JustinTrudeau, I'm a misogynist with unacceptable views that must be dealt with.(1/2)
#TrudeauMustGo

[Caroline Turek MD @doc_turek]

I’m a wife,mother and MD. I’ve served patients for over 30 years in family practice and functional medicine. Since I stood up on social media against medical coercion and vax mandates I’m now considered a danger to the public and an extremist according to Trudeau.#TrudeauMustGo

[Kulvinder Kaur MD @dockaurG]

I’m Cdn, a Sikh immigrant born in a rural farming village, raised in 🇨🇦’s remote north, trained as a specialist physician-scientist in urban Canada, incl PHAC NML. But #TrudeauMustGo says I’m a “dangerous extremist” for advocating for informed consent w/out coercions/restrictions

[Jamie Sale @JamieSale]

I am a World +Olympic Gold Medallist, represented Canada internationally for over 12 years as a figure skater, Im a mother of 2 and a freedom lover. @JustinTrudeau thinks I’m a problem and that I hold unacceptable views. #TrudeauMustGo