C.J 🍎🍏

Seeking common sense and truth in a world gone mad

[Mr. Pool @MrPool_QQ]

🔻BREAKING: SWITZERLAND BANS MAMMOGRAPHY – THE MEDICAL FRAUD UNVEILED

Switzerland has just become the first country to ban mammography, exploding the truth behind one of the biggest frauds in medical history. For decades women have been terrorized, misdiagnosed and mutilated by a system not designed to heal, but to profit. Now the mask is removed.

Mammography was never about saving lives. It was about making patients. The facts are damning:

Up to 60% false positives - Half of all diagnoses are incorrect. Women are put through chemo, mastectomies and radiation for diseases they never had.

The test itself is dangerous – Breasts subjected to brutal crushing, tissue bombarded with radiation. A "cancer test" that causes cancer.

Risk of tumor spread - Studies indicate that mammography may actually stimulate the growth of tumors. Picture believing in a test that promotes the very disease it says it’s trying to prevent.

690,000+ over-diagnoses – Healthy women were marked sick, turned into cash cows for Big Medicine.

That’s not healthcare. It's organized crime against women." A profit machine built on fear, propaganda, and mandatory annual screenings that trap millions in a cycle of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Switzerland is at war with the medical mafia. Their ban is not just a matter of policy, it is a revolutionary act that exposes the dirty secret of profits over people. The rest of the world can’t pretend anymore.

The simple truth is: better, safer options exist. Crush and radiation? No. Manual exams and advanced imaging prove it. The medical industry knows this but they keep them quiet to preserve their billion dollar empire.

Global Call to Action:
– Cease mammography in all countries.
– Track down and prosecute the profiteers.
– Fund humane and safe diagnostics.
– Teach women with truth, not fear propaganda.

Switzerland has set the fuse. The medical establishment will fight to defend its empire, but the cracks are beginning to show. The lies will not hold up.

This is not simply about identifying breast cancer, it’s about exposing the whole system that feeds off human suffering. Switzerland has taken the first step in a worldwide revolution for real healthcare. The question is: Will the world rise up or allow the medical mafia to continue destroying lives for profit?

The time for silence has passed. The truth is revealed.

♟️

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

Dr. Charles Hoff says all Canadian doctors received 'warning letters' during COVID-19 threatening physicians with investigations or discipline if they spoke out against the prevailing narratives.

https://t.co/wdugMGATCY

[Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋 @SharylAttkisson]

You were taught in med school by a system rife with conflicts of interest.

The Merck Manual is literally written by Merck. And as I documented in Follow the Science, it contains false information on numerous fronts including vaccine safety.

You belong to medical associations that have become little more than fronts for the pharmaceutical industry.

Your Continuing Medical Education classes are largely sponsored and taught by professionals being paid by the pharmaceutical companies their classes defend. They often contain incomplete, misleading, and false information.

You serve in a political body largely funded by, ruled by, and conflicted by vaccine industry donations. As both D and R members have stepped forward to admit (reported on Full Measure), your party leaders have been working for two decades to stop vaccine-autism hearings and inquiries.

You've surrendered your scientific curiosity and public health responsibilities to a conflicted dogma pushed out by propagandists with financial interests.

Vaccines are not a monolithic group that can be spoken of as "safe and effective." It's as silly and unscientific as saying "all medicine is safe and effective." There are different calculations for different vaccines and different people.

There is no study that has ever proven "vaccines do NOT cause autism." You're reciting false propaganda rather than medical science.

(Obviously, the vaccines that have been pulled from the market after widespread use were not safe and effective, after all.)

The government's chief pro-vaccine medical expert in court changed his mind and concluded vaccines can cause autism after all, but the govt. covered it up.

The government has been paying vaccine-autism injuries in vaccine court for decades while falsely telling the public the link is debunked.

A top CDC scientist recounted in detail multiple coverups at the agency regarding scientific studies linking vaccines and autism.

Autism appeared as a possible risk on the warning label for a vaccine that was later pulled from the market.

Thousands of scientific studies link vaccines to hundreds of disorders, including immune disorders such as diabetes, and neurological disorders such as autism.

The "experts" have proven wrong on nearly every major public health controversy in recent years.

I don't think the majority of people are buying what you're selling anymore.

[Ryan O'Connor @rpoconnor]

It's unprecedented for a Prime Minister to illegally freeze the bank accounts of his political opponents four months after running an entire election campaign on suspending the mobility and employment rights of millions of Canadians - and yet this doctor was silent

[Alex Berenson @AlexBerenson]

A quick guide to flu shots

Standard flu shot: Useless

mRNA flu shot: Useless, dangerous

The preceding advice applies to adults over 65, adults under 65, and children

[Nana0000 @Nana00018487212]

We’re being gaslit every single day.
Right-leaning journalists and outlets are routinely shut out of the official table. Denied accreditation. Barred from events and debates. Forced to fight in court just for the right to do their jobs and ask questions. That’s not a free press — that’s a managed one.
Meanwhile the dominant media and many pollsters operate with government funding streams, subsidies, and contracts. Suddenly the numbers and the narrative keep telling us everything is fine, the Liberals are competent, and only the opposition is the problem.
But average Canadians are living the opposite: higher costs, strained services, doubled debt, and scandals that somehow never produce real consequences.
When the people who write the stories and release the polls are financially tied to the same government they’re supposed to scrutinize, and dissenting voices are kept outside the room, the result is predictable.
The official version of reality stops matching the one people actually live. That’s not journalism. That’s narrative management.
And more Canadians are done pretending otherwise.
#cdnpoli

[L. Wayne Mathison @WayneMathison]

When a former TD chief economist who has worked on budgets since 1977 says he has never seen this level of secrecy, Canadians should pay attention.

Federal finances are public business. Taxpayers deserve clear numbers, realistic forecasts and a full accounting of what Ottawa is borrowing and spending. Hiding the details does not make the debt disappear. It simply delays the reckoning and leaves future taxpayers holding the bill.

Mark Carney sold himself as the competent financial manager. Transparency should be the easiest test of that claim. So far, his government is failing it.

[Concerned Canadian @Concern70732755]

We wouldn’t have many Liberals left if we adapted the same rules !!

[C.J 🍎🍏 @Meemou4you]

Same old play…nothing changes with these Liberals

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

Liberals wouldn’t take advantage of Canadians, right?

Nothing to hide, Right?

July 29, 2026.

Liberals on the Government Operations committee just shut down a study into the Gordie Howe Bridge.

A motion to adjourn was moved.
They voted 5-4 to kill it.
Meeting over.

No questions.
No scrutiny.
No answers on costs, delays, tolls, or who actually controls the crossing.

This is the same government that just got called out by a veteran economist for the worst lack of transparency in nearly 50 years.

When they don’t want you looking, they simply close the meeting.

The busiest trade corridor in North America and they refuse to let Parliament examine it.

I’m sure they have nothing to hide, and why they shut it down…

[Dante Rossi @tvc1five]

Pakistan 🇵🇰 is NOT in a RECESSION

Canada 🇨🇦 is in a RECESSION

Why are we giving Pakistan 47 Million dollars 💸 in aid?
⬇️⬇️

[The Real Mr Bench @therealmrbench]

CBC gets first access to Mark Carney and Canada’s premiers.

Not one question about the Gordie Howe Bridge deal.

Not one question about Canada’s wildfire management while Canadian smoke crosses the border.

Not one demand for Carney to explain his failed negotiations.

CBC immediately makes Trump the villain again.

That is not journalism.

That is publicly funded damage control for the Liberal government.

But noticing it apparently makes you a far-right conspiracy theorist.

[C.J 🍎🍏 @Meemou4you]

Mark Carney does not have Canada’s best interests in mind. This video is worth the time to watch if you want to understand the big picture

[Promethean Action @PrometheanActn]

You think President Trump's new 50% tariffs is about a dispute with Canada? Think again.

Canadian PM Mark Carney isn't defending Canada — he's the globalist's point man against Trump, & he's staffing Ottawa with globalist & Crown operatives.

@sjkokinda with the breakdown.

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

The Senate Finally Found the Bottom of the Barrel... Then Grabbed a Shovel.

Senator Charles Adler, and to every member of the Senate of Canada... I have to admit, I genuinely thought senators were supposed to be better than this. Silly me. Apparently I’ve been carrying around an outdated owner’s manual for public office.

I spent an evening going through Senator Charles Adler’s X feed myself. Not because I was looking for something to be offended by. Social media manufactures enough outrage to keep the internet employed for another century without my help. I looked because the screenshots making the rounds over the past week seemed almost too convenient. I wanted the whole story before opening my mouth.
I wish I could tell you everyone was exaggerating, but alas, they weren’t.

What I found wasn’t one bad afternoon or one regrettable lapse in judgment. It wasn’t a senator having a rough day and hitting “Post” when he should have hit “Delete.” It was a pattern. The names changed, the targets changed and the insults evolved. But the tone? The tone never did. It was almost as though someone had mistaken the Senate’s role of “sober second thought” for “sober second insult.”

On May 29 Senator Adler accused Pierre Poilievre of “sadism” for criticizing the economy. Weeks later he called him “the worst bullshitter on the planet.” Then came Conservative voters, who, according to Senator Adler, are “dumber than a bag of Fritos.” I have to admit, that last one made me pause. Not because it was offensive. I’ve heard far worse in construction yards and school bus garages. It made me pause because this wasn’t coming from an anonymous account with a cartoon profile picture and fourteen followers. It was coming from a senator. Although I will concede, comparing millions of Canadians to snack food must have required at least a brief brainstorming session of the lowest order. Perhaps there was a shortage of cranial bandwidth available that day?

Senator Adler, this really isn’t about whether I agree with your politics. Canadians disagree about politics every day, and that’s exactly how a democracy is supposed to work. It isn’t even about whether I like you personally. It’s about whether the office you accepted still means what Canadians were told it means. Right now, that answer seems about as clear as a government expense report after three rounds of redactions and one filibustered committee meeting.

And to any and every senator who may be reading this, whether you sit with the Liberals, Conservatives, Independents, or whichever alphabet soup of Senate groups currently occupies the chamber, this stopped being about Charles Adler quite a while ago.

Today it’s his social media account.
Tomorrow it could just as easily be yours.
The standard you excuse today becomes the standard that protects you tomorrow. That’s how institutions slowly drift. Not with fireworks. Not with constitutional crises. Just one shrugged shoulder at a time.

But here’s the part I genuinely can’t wrap my head around. If senators aren’t expected to conduct themselves any differently than the average political account on X, then why appoint them at all? Why not elect them like everyone else in Parliament? Why preserve the elaborate fictional facade that the Senate exists because it offers superior judgment and sober reflection if that judgment can’t tell the difference between Parliament’s Upper Chamber and the peanut gallery comments underneath a Facebook post?

Because according to the Senate’s own Ethics and Conflict of Interest Code, senators are expected to uphold “the highest standards of dignity inherent to the position of senator.”

Not respectable standards, not reasonable standards, and not standards that are marginally better than whatever is trending on social media this week either.

The highest.

Where I come from, that means it is resolute. And those are not my words, dear Senators, they’re yours. The Code also requires senators to conduct themselves in a way that doesn’t reflect adversely on either their office or the institution itself. One can only assume that particular section is read during orientation, applauded politely, filed neatly into a binder and then left to gather dust beside every New Year’s resolution ever abandoned by February.

The Senate’s own Ethics Officer made the point even more clearly in 2019. Writing in an unrelated ethics inquiry, Pierre Legault reminded senators that “the minimum standard of conduct tolerated in the community is not necessarily the same standard of behaviour that a senator must adhere to.”

Think about that for a second. The Senate itself acknowledged that senators voluntarily accepted a higher standard than the rest of us. That wasn’t some lofty aspiration, that was the deal.

So here’s where this becomes very simple:

If Senator Adler’s public conduct meets that standard, then say so. Defend it, or at least stand behind it. Tell Canadians that repeatedly calling political opponents “the worst bullshitter on the planet” and dismissing millions of voters as “dumber than a bag of Fritos” is entirely consistent with the highest standards of dignity your institution promises Canadians.

But if it doesn’t...

Then surely the Ethics Code is more than decorative wallpaper? Surely it exists for moments exactly like this? Which brings me to my final question. Not for Senator Adler, but rather, for the Senate of Canada.

You wrote the rules. You promised Canadians that senators would uphold “the highest standards of dignity inherent to the position of senator.” Those weren’t my words. They’re yours. Now Canadians have watched one of your own colleagues test those words in full public view.

So what happens next? Do the standards printed in your rule book actually mean something? Or are they simply there to impress visitors until the first inconvenient test arrives? Canadians deserve an answer as to why we are funding such vulgar content from the Senate

Because if the highest standard of dignity looks like this, perhaps it's time the Senate stopped describing itself as Canada's chamber of sober second thought... and started calling itself what it increasingly resembles: the country's most expensive comment section.

Respectfully... and I use that word in its most optimistic sense...

Melanie

(The Substack article has screenshots of his tweets)
🔗 https://t.co/IjCyYFE7S8

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

365 years of temperature data from central England, the world's longest running climate record, show no trend.

Despite a six-fold rise in population and a surge in CO2, January temperatures have barely shifted since 1600. Likewise for July, the hottest month of the year, temperatures are virtually unchanged.

The warmest winters on record happened in the 1700s, the 1800s, and the early 1900s, long before modern emissions.

Any warming is slow, natural, with the slight modern uptick likely linked to 1) the urban heat island effect, and 2) earth's gradual recovery from the little ice age.

If CO2 really controlled the climate, this chart (see video) would shoot up on the right, but it doesn't...

[Zen✨WECK @ZenWeck]

Spraying glyphosate over Ontario’s boreal forest to kill fire-resistant deciduous trees (aspen, birch, fireweed) and create flammable conifer monocultures was always risky.
Timeline: Glyphosate commercialized 1974, Canadian ag use 1976, forestry adoption ramped up late 1970s–1980s with widespread aerial spraying. Ontario continues spraying tens of thousands of hectares yearly; Quebec banned it on Crown land in 2001.
Wildfires have always been part of the boreal, but data shows increasing trends in area burned and large fire sizes since the 1980s onward, accelerating with climate-driven fire weather. Northern Ontario’s current blazes (100+ active, evacuations) are sending smoke over cottage country.
These conifer monocultures look orderly but are an ecological disaster waiting to happen. Conifers are vulnerable to pests, less hospitable to wildlife, and more flammable. Glyphosate kills moisture-retaining native plants, leaving drier landscapes that are practically begging for a spark. Studies near Thunder Bay show moose populations dropping from lost food sources. Traces contaminate berries and medicinal plants used by First Nations.
Spraying to “protect” timber yields turns forests into tinderboxes. IARC classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.” Aerosol drift from aerial apps raises inhalation and downwind exposure risks.
Fires are natural + climate-amplified, but management choices (monocultures over diverse, resilient mosaics) matter. Time to rethink before more smoky summers.
What say you, Ontario?

[Melissa 🇨🇦 @MelissaLMRogers]

HAHA 😆 all of a sudden media are now admitting that CLOTH MASKS are not effective, even for wildfire smoke

Yet just a few years ago we were FORCED to mask up to save lives 😡

I honestly feel bad for people who believed the COVID nonsense

[Melissa 🇨🇦 @MelissaLMRogers]

The Liberal Party of Canada complained about American style of Politics and now they legit just HIRED an American Democrat, Clinton strategist as their COO 😅

Can’t even make this up 🇨🇦

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

An estimated 40 million tons of wind turbine blades will end up in landfills by 2050.

Each modern blade weighs around 10 to 15 tons--mostly fiberglass and epoxy composites with 1 to 2 tons of carbon fiber, balsa and foam, plus roughly a ton of steel and copper for structural support and lightning protection.

All mined, smelted and transported using fossil fuels.

Then once they wear out, after just 15 years, those complex materials are almost impossible to recycle, so most are simply buried.

It's another hidden cost of green energy and the complete opposite of sustainable.

[TrendingPolitics.ca @TrendPolCa]

PM @MarkJCarney just handed day-to-day control of his office to an American political operative who worked for Hillary Clinton and Michael Bloomberg.

Her title didn't exist until this week, and even the Globe and Mail can't fully explain how she got here. 🧵👇 (1/6)

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Encore un scandale.

On accuse Elon Musk sans arrêt de se servir de Grok pour faire passer ses idées.

Pourtant, le @neutralityorg vient de sortir The Neutrality Project : une étude indépendante qui prouve l’inverse.

Sur 18 modèles IA testés, 54 positions sur 60 atterrissent à gauche du centre.

Moyenne globale : -0.41 (biais progressiste massif, surtout environnement et valeurs sociales).

Et Grok 4.5 ? -0.02. Le modèle le plus neutre de tout le benchmark. Le seul vraiment proche du centre.

Pendant ce temps, les autres boîtes injectent massivement leur idéologie de gauche dans des IA qui répondent à des milliards de questions par jour.

Manipulation des masses à grande échelle.

C’est absolument scandaleux. Ça devrait être un scandale mondial.

https://t.co/X1tSvJfDEY