@sjdnifiuc@rllyace@jamesbarrcomedy At best you’ve argued that pleasure alone doesn’t define a G-spot. But I didn’t cite ordinary pleasure; I cited evidence of a distinct orgasmic response associated with prostate stimulation. So what exactly is your alternative candidate, and what objective criteria are you using?
@sjdnifiuc@rllyace@jamesbarrcomedy That doesn’t actually address the claim. I’m arguing that prostate stimulation can produce a distinct orgasmic response, not that every pleasurable body part qualifies as the male G-spot. Showing that earlobes are also erogenous doesn’t refute the existence of prostate orgasms.
@GJust4@___shyy___@AtomicDove13 The days of checking your facts should start today. The Algerian boxer wasn’t proven to be a biological male, and the Paralymics case is far more nuanced than “a man stole a woman’s spot.” You’re arguing policy outcomes, not disproving that sex and gender are different concepts.
@GJust4@___shyy___@AtomicDove13 You’re proving my point. You responded with examples about sports eligibility. Whether someone should compete in a particular division is a separate debate from whether sex and gender are the same thing. You’re arguing against a position I never stated.
@sjdnifiuc@rllyace@jamesbarrcomedy Anyway… that doesn’t refute the existence of the prostate, the prostatic plexus, or prostate-induced orgasm. It just disputes the terminology.
@sjdnifiuc@RachelisSuperr@rllyace@jamesbarrcomedy That’s not a strawman. He didn’t misrepresent your argument. He accepted your premise and drew a conclusion from it. You can argue the conclusion doesn’t follow, but calling it a strawman is just using the wrong fallacy.
@rllyace@jamesbarrcomedy Why are you lying? The prostatic plexus has nerves that, when stimulated, send powerful signals directly to the brain's pleasure centers. Brain-imaging research and clinical reports confirm that a prostate orgasm is a distinct, physiologically grounded climax.