Don’t even dignify these people with a response. This is how they want the distraction to go. They wanna shift away from the content in the photo and play moral superiority charades ..because that lets them off the hook from addressing what we all just witnessed in the photo. These people are trying to get the wrong kind of response, and we’re giving it to them. Let them pretend, narrative build, and speculate. Most of us with common sense see right through it!
Because Charlie moved the youth vote so much so it was consequential to Donald’s secondary presidency. His mission was young people. Tucker and Candace, while huge podcasters and journalists, do not run multi million dollar organisations who have doners with specific interests, both financially and politically. Hope this helps.
This has got to be one of the dumbest rationalisations I’ve come across, do you know how many women get medical care that’s unrelated to their uterus and don’t know they’re pregnant? Many get x rays without knowing they’re pregnant too. A foot X-ray exposes the foot, not the abdomen or uterus. The amount of scattered radiation that reaches the uterus during a foot X-ray is extremely tiny, close to zero. Also if a dr says are you pregnant or do you think you might be, and Candace said no or I don’t think so, they usually follow through with the X-ray. Obviously. 🙄
It's actually worse than this. If he was Mirandized in Washington County or at any point before 6:25p on Friday, September 12 (this is when the Fed Slop insists he was Mirandized), then they legally COULD NOT Mirandize him again after his earlier invocation of his Miranda rights to remain silent and have an attorney present. The law says all questioning must cease after invocation of Miranda rights until an attorney is present.
Because of that reality, the Fed Slop position CANNOT be that the 6:25p being on 9/12 could have been a second Miranda warning. Again, that's because it would have been illegal to attempt to question him a second time without an attorney after he had previously invoked his rights.
This leaves the Fed Sloppers in the untenable position of maintaining he was Mirandized for the very first time 22 hours after he was taken into custody.
And that seems so extremely unlikely as to be impossible.
@AndrewKolvet That’s problematic…especially given the financial circumstances that changed for his family in April. Dodgey! Why not use the original video? Why this new one? What changed since his original testimony?
I like how @RealCandaceO just balls her fists and punches these people in the teeth. 😂
Too often, I see posts like these and just roll my eyes, block the person, and move on.
Candace straightens her high-pony and strikes!
Two different approaches to dealing with people trying to distract us from the goal of trying to find out who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why.
To be clear, trying to divide is an op. There is no division. They’ve failed with their “demon” narrative. They’ve failed to convince people we’re just making stuff up without evidence.
So now they’re trying to fake that there’s some sort of hostility.
There’s none.
There is more unity now than ever.
There is something uniquely grotesque about treating the platform of someone who has passed away as a stepping stone for your own relevance.
A legacy is supposed to be protected. A memory is supposed to be respected. Using a deceased person’s audience to elevate yourself is not tribute — it’s opportunism.
The saddest part is that the person whose name built that platform isn’t here to object to what it’s become.
People notice the difference between honoring someone and exploiting them.
The fact that this even has to be said is shameful.
Lol sooo.. the FBI has time to watch your shows and tweet you about clickbait, but can’t take 2 min to send you Kash’s schedule? And we (the presumed stupid public) are supposed to gobble up that narrative like we had to be force fed their slop about Charlie’s assassination? Am I following this clown show correctly??
@nosoup4knowles The FACT that Blake is a degenerate racist doesn’t care about Tucker or anyone’s FEELINGS that it might be the right thing to try and help redeem the irredeemable… Tucker and Charlie, love em, but aren’t the arbiters of good moral character. Evidently.
@nick_matau Sigh….Nick is the perfect example of someone who completely abandons intellect and critical thinking skills to make the argument about *checks notes* hair colour and the pronunciation of words 😑