@MieleAustralia@maggie_beer Hi @MieleAustralia . You guys are basically non contactable. Not great when we’ve bought one of your “premium” washing machines for which we’ve had to get your service guys out for twice inside the first year of ownership. Yet to fix it either. It’s a lemon.
@F111RAF@AshleyLeahy Corrupt? How so?
I presume you argue the same when your candidate gets up on preferences also?
*Ftr, I wouldn’t mind if we have a sensible debate around preferences. Intuitively, I’m not a fan - though I don’t really know. Just don’t like crying about the rules selectively.
@Natasha57932694 Cherry picking to suit a narrative is a little like combing through research data retrospectively to produce outcomes. And I know you know how those findings are graded. I do hear your point. But as Adam Bandt knows too: it’s irrelevant to the outcome in context of AEC rules.
@AGB88888@Natasha57932694@AusElectoralCom 1/2 I have no issue at all with updated approaches. (Though video ref has not removed contention from sport.) My comment is more regarding questioning the process when the cards don’t fall our way - as seems to happen more and more regardless of tech.
@AGB88888@Natasha57932694@AusElectoralCom Excruciating yes.
But I’m not sure about throwing the toys out of the cot if things don’t go our way. I mean, we expect our kids to follow the rules and respect the umpire’s call. Or maybe some don’t anymore…
@bowtiedstocks What’s with the suggestion you know better than them? It’s ok for people to have differing opinions from you. In fact, it’s probably a good thing, no?
@llpatriot6 @BernieSanders Poor take.
This sort of wealth disparity is simply unsustainable for any reasonable civilisation.
In addition, the influence which comes with that sort of wealth can’t be healthy.