@shae_sports That would make more sense. I mean what’s the point of having car dealerships in your town if they’re not going to pony up for the next quarterback?
Help explain this to me like I’m a first grader.
I thought NIL was to allow athletes to share in profits generated by college athletics.
So why would it need to be funded from other budget lines? Why would students need to be funding this?
Collective bargaining was just cited as one of the reasons for another tuition increase at the University of Virginia.
If you think education is expensive now, imagine the cost when thousands of NCAA athletes are added to the payroll.
Pushing for NCAA athlete collective bargaining is a direct tax on hardworking regular students and taxpayers.
It is a ridiculous idea.
@DNeckel19 Thank you. Was genuinely curious. But also demonstrates the point that we’ve moved beyond the argument that players deserve to share in money generated by college athletics. And in some cases profiting in excess of that.
A few years ago, CBB was facing an identity crisis with many of its big-name coaches retiring.
Now, the new era has begun to establish itself: Hurley, Golden and May all have championships, and an elite wave of risers are coming right behind them:
https://t.co/tSFbIpqU1m
NCAA leadership is expected to finalize an expansion of the men’s and women’s tournaments to 76 teams soon after this year’s tournament 🏀
The proposal would add eight games to the First Four, with 24 teams playing in an opening round before advancing into the main bracket.
Via @YahooSports | https://t.co/p64Ssx3W8a