14/ When it comes to education, the Black Caribbean population are the second least likely to receive at least three As and A-level, with only Roma Gypsies performing worse.
This study explains literally everything we see with white liberal woman’s suicidal empathy and its from 20 years ago.
In the experiment, there are subjects playing a game and subjects observing it.
when researchers shocked players for playing fairly, both men and women observers felt empathy for them.
However when researchers shocked players for cheating, male empathy went way down and their pleasure centers lit up. While women’s response was basically unchanged regardless of the players behavior.
Female biology literally feels empathy toward people receiving punishment regardless of whether they deserved it, while male empathy is conditional based on behavior.
In retrospect this is obviously exactly what happens but it explains so much about our modern political situation that i am dumbfounded i have never heard about it until now.
In progressive California, If a 19yo s0domizes a 10yo they won’t need to register as a sex offender because 🏳️🌈⚧🏳️⚧️.
Same has previously been established for if they r*ape a young girl.
See, California fixed the “inequality” in how pedos r*pe by expanding pedo rights.
Beginning in 1969 and continuing for three decades, the West German government placed orphans with male pedophiles based on a belief that being preyed upon would make them less likely to become Nazis in the future.
'He has a point, but he's too blunt.'
From the start, a key tactic of the gender identitarians has been linguistic prescription, and it's proved shockingly successful. Trans activists' shibboleths and euphemisms have been allowed to penetrate the upper echelons of our culture with devastating consequences to freedom of speech and belief. Huge swathes of liberal media, the arts, academia and publishing have thrown themselves with gusto into the defence of a quasi-religious belief causing provable real world harm, and in their arrogance they've been outraged when people they assumed were part of their In Group have refused to march meekly along in lock step.
Time and again, I've seen and heard well-educated people who consider themselves critical thinkers and bold truth-tellers squirm when put on the spot. 'Well, yes, maybe there's something in what you're saying, but it's hateful/provocative/rude not to use the approved language/pretend people can literally change sex/keep drawing attention to medical malpractice or opportunistic sexual predators. Why can't you be nice? Why won't you pretend? We thought you were one of us! Don't you realise we have sophisticated new words and phrases these days that obviate the necessity of thinking any of this through?'
As the vibe shifts, and a lot of people in the elite professions start trying to reposition themselves, the obvious place to start is, 'it's not that I couldn't see your point, but did you have to say it that way?' We dissenters were supposed to find a way of questioning the chemical castration of children while calling it 'gender affirming care.' We were meant to defend the rights of vulnerable women while also using female pronouns for male rapists. We should have found a way to discuss fairness for women and girls in sport, while pretending that the ineradicable physical advantage men have over women doesn't exist.
Either a man can be a woman, or he can't. Either women deserve rights, or they don't. Either there's a provable medical benefit to transitioning children, or there isn't. Either you're on the side of a totalitarian ideology that seeks to impose falsehoods on society through the threat of ostracisation, shaming and violence, or you're not. The alternative to being 'blunt' - using accurate, factual language to describe what was going on - was to surrender freedom of speech and espouse ideological jargon that obfuscated the issues and the harms caused. We've always needed blunt people, but we need them most of all when being asked to bow down to a naked emperor.
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
Ahoy, islanders! #AnimalCrossingNewHorizons – #NintendoSwitch2 Edition and a free content update for all players both sail ashore Jan. 15, 2026.
Watch the trailer for all the details: https://t.co/FD3aV005ZO
@PsyGuy007 C’est déjà énorme, bcp de gens ne veulent plus accepter certains héritages à cause des taxes. Si tu travailles pour acheter une maison, t’as le droit de vouloir la léguer à tes enfants quand tu meurs. Point barre.
This Muslim couple moved from France to Portugal because France is too ‘Islamophobic’.
Now, they are complaining Portugal is even more Islamophobic and hate it there.
What’s the solution to their problem?
@iamyesyouareno “The bridge was built during Emperor Fasilides reign by portuguese descendants (for this reason is also known as the portuguese bridge)”
The note is false.
@HistoryBoomer “The bridge was built during Emperor Fasilides reign by portuguese descendants (for this reason is also known as the portuguese bridge)”
You’re EXTREMELY stupid. It doesn’t even matter WHO built it, what matters is Ethiopians NEVER fixed it.
@RadicalWokeist @push_to_poz The bridge was built during Emperor Fasilides reign by portuguese descendants (for this reason is also known as the portuguese bridge)
@push_to_poz MOREOVER it is written in the introduction “The bridge was built during Emperor Fasilides reign by portuguese descendants (for this reason is also known as the portuguese bridge)” so again, that picture is RIGHT
@push_to_poz And instead, used ropes to cross. That’s beyond stupid. It does NOT matter that ONCE in centuries someone built a bridge. NOBODY else was able to fix it after it was destroyed, preferring to use ropes instead of wood or metal is DUMB. It was fixed in 2005 by AMERICANS