@bippinbushin@MoonfallenRaven@DeadbyDaylight Yeah, no.... that doesn't make sense at all. There's zero possibility of additional harassment if you legitimately show your work layer for layer from the get go instead of going AWOL. Those who have nothing to hide generally don't gaf what incels on the internet wanna say.
@oddstarhasbeen@DeadbyDaylight I honestly don’t even want to participate in the voting at all this year out of principal but you may have a point 😪 TBH I don’t plan on getting on DBD any time soon especially since the Denuvo BS my PC has been dropping frames and games crashing constantly 🙃
@mysticbubblesx0@Lionnek_ And you just believe everything you read? How does that make this any different than the people who believed the accusations when they actually did provide concrete examples of textbook AI behavior? Regardless of that, even, don’t be naive. These dots don’t connect.
@cerealforme It’s just so clearly and unapologetically AI… anyone who remains silent instead of just posting their process for the community is extremely sus IMO. Would have put an end to all of this before it got out of control…
@DBDPerkConcepts@ColorblindSnek I think the stark difference here is reference =\= tracing. Not to mention how bland the Renato submission is compared to some of the other entries. Not sure what their reasoning was behind deeming that one superior. I saw dozens more creative than even my own submission
@ShaggybyDaylite@dvveet@DeadbyDaylight Yeah I don’t think I’ve ever met an artist who isn’t proud of their process if they’re submitting it to be judged, enough so to at least post WiP progress photos. I simply can’t imagine why the artists wouldnt have been like “lol y’all are dumb here’s the proof now shut up”
@AuthorDWC@ShaggybyDaylite@dvveet@DeadbyDaylight How is this any different from the community “not having proof” that it’s AI, though? That’s a dangerous precedent to set… no matter which “side” of this mess you stand on. Why accept anyone’s word for it without proof? Accusers OR defenders?
@MoonfallenRaven@DeadbyDaylight Why else would the artists have remained silent and refused to showcase their process? This whole situation smells fishy big time….
@Deanoxicate@DeadbyDaylight@PaulieEsther1 Fair, but you’re speaking from a place of hypocrisy, no? BHVR also provided zero evidence to the contrary. You just take anyone’s word? How does that make you any better than those who jumped on the “bandwagon” of accusations? Where’s the evidence that it ISN’T AI? fair question!
@WolfYvezoficial@DeadbyDaylight It literally is. They’ll say whatever they need to say in order to justify their poor decisions and protect themselves from “being in the wrong.”
@richtervvania@prion_tv This part… the others most likely stayed silent because they were hustling to delete the AI layer they used for tracing and scribble up some new layers to make it look legitimate.Renato’s is 100% a tracing as the “artist” literally posted the same submission as AI prior to this
@prion_tv Accepting a company’s wall of text as gospel is dangerous. You just take their word for it? How is that any different than taking the word of accusers? The artists could have very well just said “hey y’all here’s my layers and process.” The silence and secrecy speaks volumes.
@scard3457@DeadbyDaylight@Mikaelanator What I don’t understand is the blatant secrecy behind the artist’s work. This is starting to feel even more suspicious than the artwork itself. What artist doesn’t love to show off their process?