@cryptowoox@dr4kom4lfoy_@C_Small_@KeithWoodsYT You've just agreed with his point and are now splitting hairs over who has precisely what kind of non-homo sapien DNA in what quantities.
Congratulations on playing yourself.
When Stalin faced the Germans in WWII, he realised that men were not very enthusiastic about fighting for his system, so he threw open the churches, brought back patriotism and the idea of 'Mother Russia'.
The British establishment gives you absolutely nothing in this regard. They don't even recognise English as an ethnicity; they flatly refuse to stop the boats and rub our faces in the dirt every chance they get.
They aren't even competent enough to win favour with the natives cynically.
This is the tragedy of the commons, online security edition. It makes sense for each of these companies individually to make their sites hyper-secure, but becomes intolerable to the consumer.
I think it is known as Anderson's rule, named after the late Ross Anderson, which is that any system must either be vulnerable to hacking or intolerable to use.
@DommeBoer@AngloLombard@jollyheretic Exceptions to the generalised rule prove nothing.
Occassionally, people are born with fewer than four limbs.
It would still be true to say that human beings have four limbs.