I’m you

my username looked cool until about five seconds ago when Twitter changed the typeface

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@DakelleFultz @BWBurner133 @EstateWill19959 @AstrosShoulda @JomboyMedia Okay. Those who were incorrectly “correcting” others were just wrong, but the correct interlocutor is a meme. That’s was a basic understanding of linguistics affords. 😝 So be it.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@BWBurner133 @DakelleFultz @EstateWill19959 @AstrosShoulda @JomboyMedia The “pitch” didn’t do anything. Like “launch,” it’s just a verb. You “pitch” a ball. The pitcher did not pitch dirt. The dirt was launched from Drake’s glove when catching the pitched ball.

You are wrong. No amount of name calling will change that.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@BWBurner133 @DakelleFultz @EstateWill19959 @AstrosShoulda @JomboyMedia Well, that’s certainly one sense of the transitive verb, but the vast majority of words have multiple sense.

“To release, catapult, or send off (a self-propelled object)” is another.

Notice how I don’t resort to ad hominems whereas you do.

Hmm. Strange.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@maevessay @pedrosarsie @God_Questioner You wrote “Catholics do not believe…that the Father sacrificed someone else.”

I responded accordingly. Again, the OP’s was a juvenile phrasing, but you’re contradicting sentiments he didn’t express.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@88jacket @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia He blocked me!

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@88jacket @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia So, if I sneeze and launch milk across the room, I can’t say that because that “iMpLiEs InTeNt”? If a motorcyclist accidentally hits a pothole, I can’t say that he launched into the air because that “ImPlIeS iNtEnT”? Rogue waves can’t “launch” boats into the air?

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@BWBurner133 @DakelleFultz @EstateWill19959 @AstrosShoulda @JomboyMedia In reality, people like you sadly do psychologically project onto others.

In reality, text doesn’t sound like anything.

In reality, objects can be launched without intent or agency.

You’re just wrong.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@eea154 @NissanAltima999 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@maevessay @pedrosarsie @God_Questioner I get that. Please interact with what I wrote in my reply. What about “impregnate” necessitates intercourse? Seriously. Even to the non-religious, IVF exists.

What about “to himself” necessitates an other?

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@DakelleFultz @EstateWill19959 @AstrosShoulda @JomboyMedia In seminary, we called this eisegesis.

Nothing about the text caption “sounds” like that. You’re introducing into it your own bias.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@pedrosarsie @God_Questioner “…had intercourse…”

He didn’t say anything about intercourse, he said “impregnate.”

“…the Father sacrificed someone else…”

He said “sacrifice himself.”

I get that this is a juvenile way to articulate it, but he didn’t say the things your reply implied.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@Eyepfrealy @Davejavu981 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia Me: “When he sneezed, he launched mucus across the room.”

You: “You can’t say ‘he launched mucus’ because he didn’t intent to do so.”

Me:

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@Eyepfrealy @Davejavu981 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia So, I can’t say “he launched” when a motorcyclist unintentionally hits a pothole and is…violently thrown forward of the bike?

I’m arguing semantics because this is a dispute of semantics. Literally nothing implies intent in Jomboy’s phrasing.

Nothing as in “no things.”

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@NissanAltima999 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@NissanAltima999 You already posted that.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

Behold the intelligence of people who can legally vote in the U.S.A.

[Bobson Dugnutt @NissanAltima999]

@eea154 @MetaIIica @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia Faggot

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@NissanAltima999 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia You’re free to stop projecting at any time. Until then, I’m going to continue holding up this proverbial mirror.

Insult me with your deepest insecurities. I welcome them. Keep them coming.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@NissanAltima999 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia You don’t even get it: I know this is not a debate. Your “eloquent” and “thought-provoking” reply made that ABUNDANTLY clear.

I’m laughing at your intellect.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@Davejavu981 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia Well said, lying, dog-faced pony soldier.

[I’m you @MetaIIica]

@NissanAltima999 @RealAGon7 @JomboyMedia That’s the best rejoinder of which you’re intellectually capable.