Ni de droite, ni de droite

[Cervixen of the Clitorians @cervixen]

TERFs are made, not born.

The fully peaked radfem does not merely “grow out of” recognizing harm -- quite the opposite. Once the harms of genderism are spotted, they're impossible to unsee. Most Terven start as allies whose brain survived the propaganda tutorial and reached the actual game. TERF levels are achieved through skill and experience.

The proto-TERF begins in the harmless ally phase: “I educated myself.”
Then the unease sets in when men like Lia Thomas show up in women's sports, drag queens twerk for toddlers, and the pronoun Stasi shut down any reasonable questions or concerns with threats of death and rape.
Then comes the readings of the forgotten texts, the combing of the forebidden forums and the following of the foresaken ones and being perplexed at how they've been so misrepresented and deliberately misunderstood.
Then they see the bad evidence for all of it, and the sham network of NGOs, AGPs, greed, and motivated reasoning fuelling it all.
Then they see the same destructive pattern everywhere: rape shelters admitting rapists, women's prisons issuing condoms to protect against the bepenised, lesbians banned from legally assembling as lesbians, girls skipping the water fountain and holding it in to avoid the boys in their restrooms, and the obvious safeguarding concerns everyone keeps pretending not to notice.

At last, she climbs down from Mount Stupid, survives the Valley of Despair, and ascends the Slope of Enlightenment, emerging as one of the Terven: the final bosses of the gender Dunning-Kruger curve.

Most of us were once very good little allies. We did the slogans. We were fully onboard to support gender nonconformity, deconstruct sexism, and burn down the patriarchy.

Then we noticed the raw deal for women, children, lebians and gay men that was being imposed through indoctrination and aggressive activism, the reification and reinforcement of gender stereotypes, the rampant misogyny and homphobia, the AGP-driven male supremacism, the Lysenkoism and iatrogenic harm and the amoral banality underlying it all. And, we noticed that other noticers were being harrassed, threatened, silenced, sidelined and demonized for noticing. But, we kept on noticing anyway. When critical thinking about genderism starts to peak, there's no come down.

So yes, some of the younger naifs may still be wandering the foothills, mistaking media saturation amd institutional propaganda for public agreement. But give them time. Allow their pattern recognition to bloom with experience. Give them one incoherent “no one knows what a woman is, but you must affirm that men are women when they demand it or be punished” argument too many. Every strawman argument, use of circular reasoning and false equivalence is a push towards the peak.

As long as trans activists continue to defend their bullshit with gross misogyny, homophobia, increasing violence and aggression, bad epistemology, poor science and non-existent logic, there is always hope.

Today’s ally is tomorrow’s Terven, provided she has courage, principles, and a functioning brain.

[Cervixen of the Clitorians @cervixen]

The Gender-Critical or "TERF" Position is a materialist analysis of sex, gender, and women’s rights. It is not a theory of hatred toward trans-identified people. It is a claim about the importance of sex as a real, human, and materially significant category in law, language, medicine, safeguarding, sport, and feminism.

Trans activists often misrepresent the views of GC feminists, sex realists and TERFs becaue honesty would cause them to lose the argument.

The following is an attempt to represent my position as a gender critical, sex realist and radical feminist precisely so it is easier to see when that view is being intentionally misrepresented and/or understood by bad faith representatives of trans activism.

I know my own position better than anyone. Bad faith is presuming to tell me what my own position is in order to discredit me. That's worse than a strawman, and the main tactic of gender essentialist activism.

Here is my actual position: the only position I need to defend:

1. Sex is real and materially significant

Sex in human beings is not an identity, a feeling, a role, or a personality type. It is a reproductive and developmental category: male and female are the two human sex classes that are the means of human reproduction. Male is the sex class organized around the development of small, mobile gametes and female is the sex class organized around the development of large, immobile gametes.

This does not mean every person is fertile, typical, or currently capable of reproduction. Infertility, menopause, hysterectomy, castration, DSDs, injury, age, or illness do not erase sex. Sex is not a human performance and there is no standard for sex beyond teproductive role. Sex is a human condition and an innate, immutable attribute of the human body.

Gender-critical feminists reject the idea that sex is “assigned at birth” in the sense of being invented, guessed, or arbitrarily imposed by authority. In ordinary cases, sex is observed and recorded. Even in rare, extraordinary cases with ambiguous secondary sex characteristics, with modern instrumentation, the primary atrribute of sex is observable at the definitive level beyond the crude level of external genitalia at the cellular level.

2. Women are female human beings

In this framework, “woman” means an adult human female. “Girl” means a juvenile human female.

This definition does not depend on femininity, beauty, clothing, sexual behaviour, reproductive capacity, compliance, heterosexuality, or conformity to stereotypes. A woman can be masculine, feminine, lesbian, bisexual, heterosexual, celibate, infertile, disabled, old, young, gender-nonconforming, or medically atypical. She remains a woman because she is female.

The position is therefore not that women must look, act, dress, think, or feel a certain way. It is the opposite: women should be free from the sex-based stereotypes traditionally imposed on female people.

3. Gender is not sex

Radical feminism distinguishes sex from gender.
Sex refers to the embodied, biological male/female distinction.
Gender refers to the social roles, stereotypes, expectations, behaviours, and hierarchies imposed on people because of sex.
Gender-critical feminism does not seek to preserve gender roles. It seeks to abolish their coercive power.

A feminine male does not become female. A masculine female does not become male. No one should have to change sex category, medically alter their body, or adopt a new identity to be allowed to reject sexist expectations.

Continued...

[Cervixen of the Clitorians @cervixen]

4. Female oppression is sex-based

Women are oppressed as a sex class. Patriarchy is not aimed at an inner identity called “womanhood.” Women are not discriminated against on the basis of their pronouns or fashion. Discrimination against wome and girls is organized around female embodiment: reproduction, pregnancy, childbirth, menstruation, female socialization, physical vulnerability, economic dependency, sexual exploitation, and male violence.

This is why sex matters in feminism. If the word “woman” is detached from female human beings, feminism loses the ability to name the class of people historically and materially subordinated under a male supremacist system.

5. Single-sex spaces and services are sometimes necessary

Gender-critical feminists do not argue that every space must be segregated by sex. They argue that sex matters in specific contexts where privacy, dignity, safeguarding, trauma, bodily vulnerability, or fairness are at stake.

Examples include prisons, rape crisis services, domestic violence shelters, changing rooms, intimate care, hospital wards, and female sports.
The argument is not that every male person is dangerous. The argument is that male-pattern violence, male physical advantage, and the privacy needs of female people are real enough that female-only provisions must remain lawful, meaningful, and enforceable.

A right to single-sex provision is not a right to harass anyone. It is not a femininity test. Masculine women, butch lesbians, and gender-nonconforming female people belong in female spaces. The category is sex, not appearance.

6. Sexual orientation is sex-based

Gender-critical feminists argue that homosexuality is same-sex attraction, not same-gender-identity attraction.

Lesbians are female people attracted to female people. Gay men are male people attracted to male people. Bisexual people are attracted to both sexes.

No one is entitled to another person’s attraction, validation, language, or sexual boundaries. Recognizing sex-based attraction is not hatred. It is basic respect for sexual orientation and consent.

7. Trans people have rights, but not the right to override sex-based rights

Gender-critical feminism does not require cruelty toward trans-identified people. It does not require denying housing, employment, medical care, ordinary public participation, or protection from violence.

The disagreement is narrower and more specific: gender identity should not override sex where sex is materially relevant.

The core objection is to compelled belief, compelled language, sex-category replacement, and policies that remove female-only boundaries without honest democratic debate.

8. DSDs do not erase the sex binary

People with differences of sex development deserve dignity, privacy, and accurate medical care. They should not be used as rhetorical loopholes.

DSDs are variations or disorders of sex development. They may complicate classification in rare individual cases, but they do not create a third reproductive sex or make male and female meaningless.

Ambiguity at the margins does not destroy the categories. It presupposes the categories exist in the first place.

[Cervixen of the Clitorians @cervixen]

The Core Differences

The central conflict is this:

Gender-critical feminism treats sex as material reality and gender as a social hierarchy to be dismantled.

Gender-identity ideology treats internal identity as primary and asks law, language, institutions, and sometimes other people’s boundaries to reorganize around that identity.

Gender-critical feminists argue that a just society can protect trans-identified people from cruelty and discrimination without erasing sex, redefining women, weakening safeguarding, or compelling everyone else to pretend that sex is irrelevant.

The Core Similarities

Despite the conflict, both sides often begin from several shared moral concerns.

Both generally agree that people should not be punished, abused, or excluded from ordinary life because they are gender-nonconforming, trans-identified, homosexual, bisexual, masculine, feminine, or otherwise noncompliant with sex stereotypes.

Both generally oppose rigid sex stereotypes. Neither side, at its best, wants boys and girls forced into narrow roles of masculinity and femininity.

Both generally recognize that trans-identified people can face cruelty, harassment, family rejection, employment discrimination, social isolation, and violence, and that such treatment is wrong.

Both generally agree that people should be free to dress, speak, behave, and present themselves in ways that do not conform to traditional expectations of their sex.

Both generally claim to be defending dignity, autonomy, and safety.

The disagreement is not over whether people deserve humane treatment. They do.

The disagreement is over whether subjective gender identity should override objective sex in society, culture, language, governance, law, safeguarding, medicine, sport, data, and female-only spaces.

The Core Contradiction

Gender Critical sex realist treats sex as a material fact and gender stereotypes as irrelevant to whether someone is male or female. A masculine woman is still female. A feminine man is still male. Personality, clothing, behaviour, interests, body modification, and inner feelings do not determine sex.

Trans activists and genderists claim to reject sex stereotypes, but actively reintroduce and endorse them by treating a person’s relationship to masculinity, femininity, social recognition as male or female, body discomfort, or “inner sense of gender” as evidence that a person is "trans" and that they belong to the opposite sex category.

This is why gender-critical feminists argue their position is less sexist: no stereotype can make a man a woman or a woman a man, and no rejection of stereotypes can make a woman less female or a man less male.

The gender-critical position is that gender stereotypes tell us nothing about a person's sex or identity.

The gender-identity position is: stereotypes are not supposed to define sex, but somehow a tiny minority's internal relationship to those same gender stereotypes must become the basis for redefining sexed language for the overwhelming majority.

[sergio-dde🐭🐞 @sergiodde]

Court reportage sur l'alimentation moderne. Vous savez celle que les élites eugénistes veulent nous imposer à la place des viandes naturelles des cheptels que l'on élimine par la force publique pour des maladies pas dangereuses.

Mais, surtout, en attendant de nous achever, il faut se faire un maximum de fric sur notre santé, comme Big Pharma...

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

IVERMECTIN + FENBENDAZOLE FULL PROTOCOL: Exact Doses for Cancer, Parasites & Chronic Illness

Ivermectin (by body weight — US pounds examples):
150 lb person
• Low ≤0.5 mg/kg → ~34 mg
• Medium 1.0 mg/kg → ~68 mg
• High 2.0 mg/kg → ~136 mg
• Very High ≥2.5 mg/kg → ~170 mg

180 lb person
• Low → ~41 mg | Medium → ~82 mg | High → ~164 mg | Very High → ~205 mg

200 lb person
• Low → ~45 mg | Medium → ~91 mg | High → ~182 mg | Very High → ~227 mg

Fenbendazole (fixed dose):
• Low: 222 mg (3 days/week)
• Medium: 222 mg (6 days/week)
• High: 444 mg (6 days/week)
• Very High: 888–1000 mg (6 days/week)

Used For:
• Cancer (various stages)
• Parasitic infections & cleanses → Low to Medium Doses
• Lyme Disease & co-infections → Medium to High Doses
• Viral illnesses & prophylaxis → Low to Medium Doses

Support with Milk Thistle, Curcumin, Vitamin E + CBD.
Always monitor liver & kidney function.

Save it. Share it. Someone needs this today.

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

BREAKING: The real reason people quit Ivermectin isn't side effects - it's because nobody told them about TOXIN CLEARANCE

Here's what happened to Sarah, a cancer patient who almost gave up on Ivermectin after day 3...

She started feeling worse - headaches, fatigue, nausea. Her doctor said "stop immediately, it's not working."

But Sarah didn't know about the Herxheimer reaction - when parasites die, they dump toxins into your bloodstream.

The "side effects" she was feeling? That was her body trying to clear out years of parasitic damage.

Day 7: Sarah stuck with it and added proper detox support. Symptoms started to lift.

Day 21: Her energy came back in a way she hadn't felt in years.

Most people quit right before things turn around. They think Ivermectin is hurting them when it's actually WORKING.

The parasites are dying. The toxins are moving out. Your body is finally getting a chance to heal.

But nobody warns you about this part.

[William Makis @MakisMedicine]

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and FENBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 53 year old man from Connecticut with Stage 4 Prostate Cancer to bones reports after 6 months: PSA drops 99.9%!

Ivermectin revolutionizing Prostate Cancer 😃

STORY:
53 year old man from Connecticut with Stage 4 Prostate Cancer to bone

In August 2025 he started:

Ivermectin 48mg (increased it to 96mg)
Fenbendazole 444mg (increased it to 1500mg)

Results after 6 months:

PSA 948 to 1.13 = 99.9% drop (!!)

PSMA scan (Oct.24, after 3 months) showed 50% less disease!

"Oncologist says he's "responding well" which we think is a massive understatement! Oncologist does not know he's on the Ivermectin or Fenbendazole"

"PSA 99.9% drop in six months!"

How does Ivermectin and Fenbendazole fit into the treatment picture here?

Aside from the dozen mechanisms of action, each contributes to treatment synergy.

Treatment synergy means you get more cancer cell killing in combination than with any of the components by themselves.

This is the cutting edge of Cancer Care.

Competent Oncologists should be taking advantage of treatment synergy to give the patient the best treatment option.

They're not doing it. But we are going to change that! 😉

I have helped over 9000 Cancer patients with Ivermectin, Mebendazole, Fenbendazole in the largest Ivermectin Cancer Project in the world!

This project is moving to Florida, but please be patient while the move is being finalized.

Repurposed drugs are the future of Cancer Care and Florida is going to be the global hub of repurposed drug research and innovation! 🔬

We are working on:
Ivermectin and Mebendazole Clinical Trials
Cancer Clinics ("Right to Try")
Patents (will shake up the world)
Publications (over 600 cases being prepared) Repurposed Drug Access (lower cost)

and so much more!

Article link is located in first photo at the top to avoid shadowbanning on X, just retype the URL into your browser to access

[Alexandre Cappucci @ALEXANDRE121975]

Cela fait plus d'un siècle qu'on sait produire du pétrole artificiel. Il est d'ailleurs produit dans la majorité des près de 700 raffineries de production de pétrole dans le monde. Seul un très faible pourcentage est extrait des réserves naturelles, elles aussi renouvelables par des processus auto alimentés, pouvant perdurer selon certains experts, l'équivalent de plusieurs vies de notre étoile qui selon la théorie officielle sur ce sujet, lui aussi, ultra spéculatif, serait de 10 milliards d'années.

Cela pour donner une idée, des réserves réelles quasi illimitées, de ce que pourrait fournir la Terre sur plusieurs dizaines de milliards d'années, juste en prélevant ce pétrole. Donc non, il n'y a jamais eu de pic pétrolier et il n'y en aura pas.

On sait même retransformer les matières plastiques en pétrole pur, pour en faire des carburants ou de nouveaux, des coques de protection pour nos appareils électroménagers, ou pour les fils électriques et cetera ...

En fait cette ressource comme pleins d'autres, pourrait largement être fournie à la population mondiale gratuitement.

Un certain Jean Laigret, dès 1949, voir un peu avant, avait trouvé une méthode pour créer du pétrole à l'infini à partir de diverses matières biologiques.

C'est la même chose pour la prétendue rareté de l'Or, qui n'est absolument pas rare, mais est présent en très très grandes quantités partout sur Terre, et on sait aussi le créer industriellement, la même chose pour les diamants et cetera ....
https://t.co/CuKfcGS3Fk

[Philippe T @brain_stimulus]

🚨LE PÉTROLE N’EST PAS UN COMBUSTIBLE FOSSILE.

💥C’est une invention de Rockefeller et de quelques scientifiques en 1892 pour faire croire au monde entier que le pétrole était rare et en voie d’épuisement.

🤯Dans cette interview explosive, un ancien haut responsable explique comment :

🔥- On a délibérément défini le pétrole comme « résidu de matière autrefois vivante » lors d’une convention scientifique à Genève.

🔥- On n’a jamais trouvé de vrai fossile à plus de 5 000 mètres de profondeur… alors qu’on fore du pétrole à plus de 10 000 mètres.

🔥- Le pétrole est le **deuxième liquide le plus abondant** sur Terre.

🔥- L’idée de « raréfaction » permet de justifier des prix exorbitants et des « indemnités de tarissement ».

Vous comprenez maintenant pourquoi on vous répète depuis des décennies que « le pétrole va bientôt manquer » ?

Regardez cette vidéo jusqu’au bout. C’est l’un des plus grands mensonges industriels du XXe siècle.

Vous en pensez quoi ? Croyez-vous toujours que le pétrole est un combustible fossile ? Dites-le franchement en commentaire 👇

[Jikkyleaks 🐭 @Jikkyleaks]

Now you know where the "pharma R&D billions" go, that you pay for in your drug price.

Not into researching new drugs but paying off litigants so that the truth about contaminated drugs can never see the light of day.

What was in the Gardasil documents?

#Plasmidgate

[LE COLLECTIF 🅻🅴 🅲🅾🅻🅻🅴🅲🆃🅸🅵 🇫🇷 @tatiann69922625]

Espagne 🇪🇸 🚨🚨 Médecin espagnol met en garde contre l'AUGMENTATION IMPRESSIONNANTE des cas de cancer et des problèmes de santé immunologique causés par les injections COVID...

Augmentation des tumeurs hématologiques et digestives, en particulier chez les jeunes, et l'apparition des soi-disant « cancers turbo »...

Il affirme que les injections sont un facteur qui contribue à la détérioration du système immunologique...

[Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub @Ivermectinkart]

Ivermectin: The Cancer Killer They Don't Want You to Know About!

Ivermectin isn't just an anti-parasitic drug — it has powerful anti-cancer properties that Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about. Here's how it works to disrupt cancer growth:

🔴 Stops Cancer Cell Growth - Blocks
Wnt/B-catenin signaling, preventing tumors from spreading.

⚰️ Induces Apoptosis - Triggers cancer
cell death while leaving healthy cells untouched.

🧹 Promotes Autophagy - Forces cancer cells to self-destruct by breaking down damaged components.

🚫 Cuts Off Tumor Blood Supply - Prevents angiogenesis, starving cancer cells.

🔥 And the BEST part? It kills cancer stem cells, the ones responsible for recurrence and metastasis-which chemo and radiation fail to eliminate.

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

🚨🚨 Remember when the media laughed and told you that Ivermectin was only for horses and cows? They knew it was made for humans since 1987...
This is what they didn't want you to know...
1 – Prevents damage caused by drugs created with mRNA technology, blocks the entry of the Spike Protein into cells and, if the person was vaccinated, can treat the damage already produced through Ivermectin.
2 – It only has beneficial effects and no harmful effects in the treatment of the C virus. In fact, even before entering the cell, it has already destroyed the virus in the blood.
3 – It has a very potent anti-inflammatory action and has a powerful impact on traumatic and orthopedic injuries, strengthens muscles and has no side effects like corticosteroids.
4 –Treats autoimmune diseases such as: rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, fibromyalgia, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, allergic rhinitis.
5 – Improves immunity levels in cancer patients and treats Simple Herpes and Herpes Zoster, plus reduces the frequency of sinusitis and diverticulitis.
6 – Protects the heart in case of cardiac overload. In an embolism, for example, it prevents cardiac hypoxia, as it stimulates the production of basic energy to avoid tissue destruction and, therefore, improves cardiac function.
7 – It is antiparasitic and antineoplastic (anticancer). Supposedly, it suppresses the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells, preserving healthy cells and improving the efficacy of chemotherapy treatment.
8 - Can kill chemotherapy-resistant cancer cells, overcoming resistance to multiple chemotherapeutics that tumors develop, and combined with chemotherapy and/or anticancer agents, provides an increase in the effectiveness of these treatments.
9 – It is antimicrobial (bacteria and viruses) and increases immunity.
10 – Reaches the Central Nervous System and regenerates nerves.
11 – Helps regulate glucose, insulin metabolism, cholesterol levels and reduces liver fat in steatosis.
12 - Can be used as a prophylactic agent and has been associated with a significant reduction in C-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality rates.
🚨🚨 The untold story of a «miracle drug»...
• Discovered on a golf course in Japan
• Has brought river blindness to the brink of elimination.
• Won the Nobel Prize in 2015
• Recognized, after penicillin, as having the greatest impact on human health.
• More than 3.7 billion doses...
• This parasite killer now also turned tumor terror...
12 Known Anticancer Actions:
1. Inhibits the WNT/β-catenin pathway: stops the proliferation of cancer cells.
2. Induces apoptosis: triggers programmed death of cancer cells.
3. Blocks importin α/β transporter proteins, preventing replication of cancer cells.
4. Inhibits the PAK1 enzyme: reduces inflammation and tumor progression.
5. Antiangiogenic: stops the formation of new blood vessels in tumors.
6. Immune system modulator: improves recognition of cancer cells.
7. Autophagy disruptor: interferes with cancer cells' survival strategies.
8. Targets glioblastoma stem cells: effective in brain cancers.
9. Inhibits mitochondrial respiration: cuts off energy supply to tumors.
10. Disrupts mTOR signaling, slowing cell growth.
11. Overcomes chemotherapy resistance: makes chemotherapy more effective.
12. Antiviral properties: potentially useful for virus-related cancers (like HPV).

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

This is the FIRST-EVER published case of an advanced Alzheimer's patient regaining speech, detailed memory, AND bladder control simultaneously within 19 hours.

After a single 5g psilocybin dose, an 80-year-old woman — bedbound, incontinent, and speaking only single syllables for years — woke up 19 hours later talking fluently for hours and recalling long-lost life events.

In the days that followed, dramatic improvements emerged:

• speech restored
• walking regained
• emotional connection returned
• independent dressing
• bladder control restored overnight

Many gains were still present at 1-month follow-up.

No approved drug has ever done anything close.

[Mr. Pool @MrPool_QQ]

🔻 SUNSCREEN ENTERS YOUR BLOODSTREAM IN UNDER 24 HOURS. THE FDA CONFIRMED THIS IN 2019. THEY DID NOT PULL A SINGLE PRODUCT. THEY TOLD YOU TO KEEP APPLYING.

In January 2020, a randomized clinical trial published in JAMA found that six active sunscreen chemicals — including oxybenzone and avobenzone — absorb into the bloodstream after a single application. Not after years. After one use. At concentrations exceeding the FDA's own safety threshold by 180x to 500x.

The FDA did not recall them. They issued a statement: "Continue to use sunscreen."

Oxybenzone is a confirmed endocrine disruptor. It mimics estrogen. It crosses the placental barrier. It has been found in 97% of Americans tested. It is in breast milk. It is in amniotic fluid. It is in your children before they are born.

A former formulation chemist — 11 years at a top-3 sunscreen manufacturer:

"We had internal absorption data by 2014. Full transdermal penetration within 26 minutes of application. The compounds don't sit on the skin. They were never designed to. The delivery mechanism is identical to a pharmaceutical patch. We knew this. The mitigation strategy was never reformulation — it was public messaging. Keep the consumer applying. The margins on chemical sunscreens are 1,400% above production cost. Mineral alternatives cost 4x more to produce. The decision was financial. Every internal document confirmed that."

They told you the sun causes cancer. What they didn't tell you:

Vitamin D — produced only through direct sun exposure — is the single most critical regulator of immune surveillance against malignant cells. A 2023 meta-analysis confirmed: Vitamin D deficiency correlates with a 30-60% increased risk of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers.

They blocked the one thing your immune system needs to fight cancer. Then sold you a chemical that enters your blood and mimics hormones. Melanoma rates have increased 320% since 1975 — the exact period sunscreen use became widespread.

The paradox is published. McGill University, 2023: "Sunscreen usage is climbing, but so are melanoma and skin cancer rates."

They didn't protect you from cancer. They removed your defense against it and charged you $14 a bottle.

15 minutes of direct sun daily. No screen. Arms and face exposed. Your body produces 10,000-20,000 IU of Vitamin D in that window — the amount they sell you in pills because they blocked the free version.

CODE: JAMA-2020-6CHEM / OXYBENZONE-97PCT / VIT-D-IMMUNE / MELANOMA-320-1975 / MCGILL-PARADOX-2023

⟁
They made you afraid of the sun so they could sell you a hormone disruptor and call it protection. The sun is free. That's why they taught you to fear it. Share this.

[Philippe T @brain_stimulus]

🚨 L’ALIMENT LE PLUS DANGEREUX POUR VOTRE FOIE

🤯Ce n’est ni le sucre, ni la viande transformée, ni les graisses saturées.

💥C’est **l’huile de graines**.

Huile de tournesol, de soja, de maïs, de colza, de pépins de raisin…

Elles sont extraites avec de l’**hexane**, un solvant issu de l’essence.
Elles sont chauffées à très haute température, oxydées, et deviennent extrêmement instables.

Une fois dans votre corps, ces huiles s’oxydent et créent une inflammation chronique.
Elles finissent par se loger dans votre foie… mais aussi dans votre cerveau et votre système nerveux.

Elles ne ressortent pas facilement. Certaines études estiment qu’il faut **1 à 2 ans** pour les éliminer.

Et pendant ce temps, elles continuent de « rouiller » vos organes de l’intérieur.

On nous a dit pendant 40 ans que ces huiles étaient « saines » et « végétales ».

On nous a menti.

Remplacez-les dès maintenant par de l’huile d’olive, du beurre, du saindoux ou de l’huile de coco.

Votre foie vous remerciera.

#QuestionTout

[The Eagle flies free @Fa21519230]

🚨🚨 El magnesio previene los ataques cardiacos...a más consumo de sal hasta un límite, menor presión arterial y menor riesgo de paro cardíaco...
El corazón depende en gran medida del equilibrio de minerales como el sodio y el magnesio, que juegan un papel importante en la presión arterial y el ritmo cardíaco...
Dr. Bryan Ardis.

[Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub @Ivermectinkart]

These are dosing charts for Ivermectin , Fenbendazole and Mebendazole.

Ivermectin horse paste dosage.

Every notch equals 50 lbs for humans. Example 150 lbs you take 3 notches. If you have cancer you take more.

If you have any questions on the dosing charts, just ask. I do not mind helping you!

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

Ivermectin: The Cancer Killer They Don't Want You to Know About!

Ivermectin isn't just an anti-parasitic drug — it has powerful anti-cancer properties that Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about. Here's how it works to disrupt cancer growth:

🔴 Stops Cancer Cell Growth - Blocks
Wnt/B-catenin signaling, preventing tumors from spreading.

⚰️ Induces Apoptosis - Triggers cancer
cell death while leaving healthy cells untouched.

🧹 Promotes Autophagy - Forces cancer cells to self-destruct by breaking down damaged components.

🚫 Cuts Off Tumor Blood Supply - Prevents angiogenesis, starving cancer cells.

🔥 And the BEST part? It kills cancer stem cells, the ones responsible for recurrence and metastasis-which chemo and radiation fail to eliminate.