Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

LA IA VIENE A REMPLAZARNOS | #DOBLAO https://t.co/jREqaKXOPe via @YouTube

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

LA IA VIENE A REMPLAZARNOS | #DOBLAO https://t.co/jREqaKYmEM via @YouTube

[Agustín Laje @AgustinLaje]

Miren Francia: esos son los resultados reales del multiculturalismo globalista.

Islamización, oikofobia y destrucción de la cultura occidental. Todo ello catalizado por los idiotas útiles favoritos de los enemigos de Occidente: la izquierda.

Tenemos que proteger cuanto antes a América Latina de ese peligro que, en el horizonte, ya podemos identificar con claridad. Seguimos nosotros, es cuestión de tiempo.

Los gobiernos de derecha que están llegando al poder tienen la misión histórica de empezar a plantear reformas profundas que impidan la islamización de nuestro continente. Es un asunto de índole existencial para nuestra civilización.

No podemos ofrecerles derechos políticos, o terminarán destruyéndonos; no podemos permitir que multipliquen sus mezquitas, o terminarán radicalizándose; no debemos financiarles sus vidas con nuestros impuestos, dado que no son nuestros compatriotas.

En sus países nosotros no tenemos permitido hacer nada de lo que ellos pretenden hacer en los nuestros: ni promover nuestra religión, ni difundir nuestras pautas culturales, ni determinar el curso de sus políticas. Haberles abierto las puertas es la imbecilidad más grande que podemos haber cometido.

Ya no estamos hablando de especulaciones. Europa está cayendo ante nuestros ojos. No eran “teorías de la conspiración” ni alarmismos disparatados. Quien quiera ver la realidad, que solo abra los ojos.

[Johannes Kaiser @Jou_Kaiser]

Pague la deuda Presidente!

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

Ahora Metallica me gusta un poco más.

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@DotCSV Jueves: lo del miércoles fue una operación orquestada y bien financiada.

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@patriciajaniot Sos una buena periodista. Pero en este caso los no-periodistas están haciendo mejor trabajo que vos: https://t.co/2GUTOGnSPH

[Wes Roth @WesRoth]

they are ALL lying...

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@WesRoth Yup.

[Danann @DanannOficial]

@Apu_elrojo O sea que cuando gobierna la izquierda, bajan la capacidad de análisis, el pensamiento crítico, la comprensión lectora y la calidad de la educación. Quizás sea por eso que la gente ya no quiera votar por la izquierda.

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@biobio cayó

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@biobio Bio Bio cayo en la operación:
https://t.co/R8tmjFf1Hg

[Parker Thayer @ParkerThayer]

This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.

2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.

According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.

The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.

Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.

And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.

What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?

3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.

It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.

4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

Yo caí y reposteé el mensaje original, pero ya lo eliminé. Está bastante claro que están tratando de manipularnos para que aceptemos regulaciones estúpidas sobre la IA y a una dictadura global. Suena a teoría de la conspiración, sí, pero muchas han terminado por confirmarse.

[Parker Thayer @ParkerThayer]

This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.

2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.

According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.

The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.

Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.

And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.

What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?

3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.

It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.

4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@biobio Chocolate por la noticia

[Carlos Santana @DotCSV]

Al margen del gran titular de hoy, ojito a esto:

"...muchos matemáticos y físico en OpenAI han vivido su momento Lee Sedol al ver a este nuevo modelo resolver EN MINUTOS problemas con los que ellos llevan enfrentándose durante años." wtf

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@pmddomingos I'm not taking any stance, though. I know nothing about the Navier Stokes problem.

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@pmddomingos Hehehe. Thanks X for showing the timeline in that order:
https://t.co/cdUGhyD1eC

[Jubal Hardin @Jubal_Hardin]

What makes solving Navier-Stokes important?

Fluid dynamics affects more than you realize in your everyday life. This breakthrough — if it is true — gives you:

Cheaper, safer flying and driving. Air over a wing or around a car is a Navier-Stokes problem. Better control of that flow means less drag, so planes and trucks burn less fuel, stay quieter, and stall less often.

Weather you can actually plan around. Storms, jet streams, and ocean currents are giant fluid problems. Sharper turbulence physics is one of the remaining limits on hurricane tracks, heat waves, and flood forecasts. That is the difference between “maybe evacuate” and a clear warning.

Hearts, stents, and artificial valves. Blood is a fluid. Doctors already simulate flow through arteries and implants from CT/MRI scans. A more reliable theory of swirling, high-speed blood flow would help design stents, heart valves, and aneurysm treatments that work better.

Cleaner power from wind and turbines. Wind hitting a turbine blade, steam inside a power plant, and fuel mixing in an engine are all the same equations. Better models mean more electricity from the same wind farm and engines that waste less fuel

Ships, pipes, and dirty air. Oil in a pipeline, water in city mains, smoke over a city, and waves slamming a hull all follow Navier-Stokes. Better predictions cut leaks, pump energy, and help track pollution after a spill or wildfire.

Many other everyday effects: buildings, sports, and rain. The same math decides whether a skyscraper sways in a gale, why a dimpled golf ball flies farther, how air moves through a house’s vents, and even how raindrops form in clouds. Those are not abstract puzzles; they are why planes fly, forecasts exist, and a stadium roof doesn’t peel off.

None of this happens instantly because of a math problem solution by AI. But everything that does happen is going to help engineer a better life for all of us. This is big.

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.

The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.

The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

ChatGPT Images 2.5—faster, sharper, smarter, with better tools for creating whatever you can dream of.

- Faster image generation to keep your ideas flowing

- Improved fidelity for more natural, recognizable images

- Consistent details across multiple edits

- Comment-based edits to change only what you want

[Danann @DanannOficial]

@SafuVlogs Hola, @grok, contale a esta usuaria sobre el hinduismo shaktista, la Wicca tradicional y la Wicca Diánica, Isis, Cibeles y Astarté. Hacelo de forma simple y didáctica como para que lo entienda un niño mentalmente impedido.

[Miguel Chaves 🇺🇾🇧🇷🇨🇱 @MglChvs]

@JRZ_THL @dustinthedad @rob2628 He said "rates". Absolute population doesn't matter.