@mpipe77 @lynchk16 I agree. Abridging the right of SIGs to donate is limiting free exercise imo, which undermines the Constitution. However, there should be a check to everything, which in this case should involve regulation.
@Eunjae41452219@wade_glover_ @lynchk16 While I think their are some problems with the practice, I do not think it's fair to prevent retired government officials from seeking the job of a lobbyist (interference with private citizen).
@NotADiscoBall @lynchk16 While lobbying could sometimes involve pseudo-bribery, I ultimately believe lobbying is protected under the First Amendment as people should have the right to express their views.
@lynchk16 3A: SIGs can file amicus curiae briefs and directly support one side of the case to achieve their goals. I hope to attend UT since it has a good CS program and Austin is a pretty cool city. #lynchapgovtwitterchat#lynchapgovmob
@lynchk16 3A: A network between Congress, Bureaucracy, and SIGs. Congress creates favorable legislation, bureaucracy implements, and SIG's lobby Congress for legislation. I think Congress has the largest impact as they are the eminent lawmaking body. #lynchapgovmob#lynchapgovtwitterchat
@lynchk16 3A: SIGs indirectly buy favorable legislation through advocacy. I think SIGs ultimately should be able to donate to candidates since it often takes an interested group to foster change within political system. #lynchapgovmob#lynchapgovtwitterchat
@lynchk16 3A : A revolving door is when an ex-government official becomes a lobbyist. While this practice may result in some skewed legislation,the revolving door is ultimately ethical as government officials should have the chance to express views. #lynchapgovmob#lynchapgovtwitterchat
@lynchk16 Lobbyists are representatives of SIGs who speak on their behalf. They try to convince government officials to support their stances and get them to introduce favorable legislation. I think they are not regulated enough as lobbyists have a lot of resources.