@Polish_Buddy@garyvee@veefriends I hate it, but I agree. Veefriends is a money grab first and community last, which is what I felt built it. Shame when someone forgets (or never knew) their roots.
@KOWSKY_@garyvee@veefriends@grok I agree. Transparency is necessary but transparency without a genuine apology feels more like PR than accountability. Customers dont just want to know why it happenedthey want to hear that the company recognize the inconvenience it caused. Thats the piece I think is still missing
@KOWSKY_@garyvee@veefriends@grok This also isn't an isolated incident, it's the second Chrome launch with major rollout issues. At some point, the pattern matters.
@KOWSKY_@garyvee@veefriends@grok I respect that, but I don't see "that's on me" as the apology people deserved. The response was still mostly explanations for why it happened. Customers drove around based on information VeeFriends published. A simple "We're sorry we wasted your time" shouldn't be this hard.
@garyvee@KOWSKY_@veefriends@grok This was the easiest layup apology imaginable, and somehow it still turned into a list of reasons why it wasn't really your fault. "That's on me" only means something when it's followed by "I'm sorry." This is the second Chrome launch in two years with avoidable issues.
@DavidYusuf1@garyvee Nobody said success was a crime. You turned criticism of VeeFriends into a story about yourself. Self absorbed much? My point is that the average collector has watched whales get preferential treatment over and over. That's not "community"—that's tiered access.
@DavidYusuf1@garyvee Nobody said success was a crime. You turned criticism of VeeFriends into a story about yourself. Self absorbed much? My point is that the average collector has watched whales get preferential treatment over and over. That's not "community"—that's tiered access.