Michael Casp

An (overly) ambitious production editor.


[Mike Di Natale @mdinatSTM]

Amazing thread from this week's TSK webinar

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

@TashaMellCoh Thank you! I have a theory that a lot of people think there is a big magic "publish" button that turns their manuscript into a published article.

[Kaveh Bazargan @kaveh1000]

Accessibility is important. Here is a book that we have created using the @OpenDyslexic typeface.
https://t.co/YOVIOHy52d

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

@JenniferARegala I missed the poll but running Twitter seems like a terrible job, and you deserve better! :)

[Melanie Dolechek @h82w8md]

If you're looking for a new career opportunity in 2023, check this out! We're looking for a new Program Director. Position is remote, team is amazing, members are second to none!

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

Key takeaway from this year's Society Member Survey: Open Access is a driver for society membership. This position paper has some great insights to help you capitalize on this trend. https://t.co/zM2HCNd0nI

[Tom Gara @tomgara]

The thing is, this is the correct shape for a car. It just took us a hundred years to land on it. But this is it - it's either a this, or a small version of this called a "hatchback"

[Car Dealership Guy @GuyDealership]

Design is dead.

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

@AndrewMariunus @Philip_Goff Yup came here to say this

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

@acochran12733 @JenniferARegala Yep this is how we've done it on journals I've managed. The alternates feature is nice. Just can't give your invitees too long to respond before moving to alts. A string of no-responses can drag out the process if you give them too much time.

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

It was a joy to participate in #ISMTEGlobal. The content, the execution, and the general vibe were all top notch. Thanks to all the staff and volunteers who made this happen! @ISMTE

[Roger C. Schonfeld @rschon]

"an interesting inside story of how Google came to partner nearly two decades ago with a handful of major research libraries to digitize their scholarly collections...a timely and apt primer on the significance of what happened then and what may yet follow."

[Kaveh Bazargan @kaveh1000]

jamie Wielgus and @MichaelCasp of @jjeditorial describing the new Wiley Partner Solutions, using the many company mergers with Wiley. #ISMTEGlobal

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

Wish we had more than an hour, I was loving the conversation and had so much more left to say! Don't miss the recording if you missed the session this morning. #ISMTEGlobal

[Scholastica (this account moved to Bluesky) @scholasticahq]

We're just a few hours from our #ISMTEGlobal session on the what, why, and how of moving to a single-source digital production process — hope to see you there! FT: @MichaelCasp @jjeditorial, Marianne Calilhanna @dclaboratory, Kathleen Seeberg @MSMA1, and Scholastica's @briancody

[Miranda van Tilburg @DrvanTilburg]

Previous PhD student sent this to me and I can't stop laughing.

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

@VijaykumarAkaVJ @JBuriak Unsupervised automation is my guess. The robots goofed and there was no human to ungoof it

[Jose Afonso Furtado @jafurtado]

We Asked the Community: Is Research Integrity Possible without Peer Review? By Jennifer Regala (@JenniferARegala), Michael Groth, Michael Casp (@MichaelCasp) / @scholarlykitchn https://t.co/n73Vp0qaQ3

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

@maw_tweets It depends on how the board and team are structured, but generally no, the "editorial team" is usually the EIC, assoc eds, section eds, managing eds, etc. The editorial board is typically a wider group who give (often non-binding) advice to the ed team & do a lot of reviewing

[Michael Casp @MichaelCasp]

Hi @profsassy, I saw you speak earlier this year in Pittsburgh. I'm now working with The Scholarly Kitchen on a piece about research integrity for Peer Review Week.

Would you like to respond (1-2 paragraphs) to the prompt: "Is research integrity possible without peer review?"