Verisimilitude

“When an honest man discovers he is mistaken, he either ceases to be mistaken, or he ceases to be honest.” Climate Realism|Transcending left vs right

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

"I think if you were to go back and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th Amendment, which was the internal revenue, the ‘income tax’, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of States never ratified that Amendment."U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan vs. United States, 2003.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

I really hope the entire public wake up to the truth about the climate crisis narrative- it is based on fraudulent computer models, or fake “science.” It is not valid and any intelligent person can figure that out.
It’s not about the environment at all - it is about enslaving you to a global government of your own free will.
Once the globalist agenda is accomplished, the real truth, that carbon dioxide is beneficial and not the driver of climate will come out, but then it will not matter.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@tynewrc There is no man made climate crisis. In a sane world the CLINTEL signatories would have sparked a debate and an investigation into fraudulent climate models masquerading as “science.”

https://t.co/LVO5xVzTQ4

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

Let’s be much clearer. Your statements are founded in a belief system which is completely false. Provably false. CO₂ is not the thermostat control of the world.
Sure- They claim that it is human emissions that are causing climate change/even call it a crisis. For many years I accepted the idea. Greenhouse gasses. “What is that sci-fi author thinking!? Everyone know we are emitting too much… It’s us…” That’s where I was in2011. Then I researched it deeply, computer science being my lens. I found that this claim is not from rigorous empirical science. As I examined the models this claim is based on, I was stunned, it was such a house of cards. I completely changed my views. I was “trusting authority.” It turned out that was a huge mistake. I
believe that any reasonably intelligent person who really looks carefully and objectively into the IPCC (and other government agencies) so called “settled science” will learn the truth.
Climate change is complex. Fudging models to generate matching curves of history, when millions of variables are unaccounted for is nothing more than an academic exercise.
As Nobel laureates have signed the CLINTEL declaration, if appeal to authority is your thing, any claim of consensus has been challenged.
But there is more going on than that. This is all about a political agenda, not the environment.

The biggest fraud is the use of ground station data that has been manipulated to falsely confirm the models are working.
Satellite data, which we have less of historically paints a completely different picture. But that data is problematic because the of the large error margin in the instrumentation.

Massive Oversimplification

The global climate is a complex nonlinear system with likely billions of variables. We lack the precision instrumentation necessary to discover and catalog the micro-level climate inputs and modifiers and therefore the models rely only on macro-level inputs. The natural carbon cycle is very poorly represented.

Solar and cosmic inputs are poorly modeled.

Until the most recent model iterations (which are only marginally better) only Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) was considered. There are many other climate inputs from the sun and other space weather that impact how the climate changes.

The persistence of human emissions in the atmosphere are greatly exaggerated.

This is simply bad math.

The carbon cycle is complex. 93% of CO₂ is dissolved in the oceans. There are many other natural ways of sequestration and emission but the ocean is the big player. As ocean temperatures rise CO₂ is released. As ocean temperatures decrease CO₂ is absorbed.

Mury Salby analyzed the persistence of CO₂ using radioisotope data and found that the natural cycle sequesters CO₂ with a half life of 4 years. He was not able to publish this study as it goes against the desired narrative.

Feedback mechanisms

The models assume that CO2 interacts with water vapor to supercharge its IR absorption. This is an untested assumption.

From CLINTEL - their declaration signed by 1500+ scientists and engineers including at least 2 Nobel laureates states
“There is no climate crisis”

“Climate policy relies on inadequate models

Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO₂. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO₂ is beneficial.

CO₂ is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

CO₂ is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO₂ is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO₂ in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.”

https://t.co/JWpqqtOPMr

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@DNIGabbard Always knew Tulsi was a a white hat. Awesome
This will lead to 2020 election

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

Ad hominem attack on his credibility instead of actually engaging on any of the actual substance his arguments?
I really don’t care what academics have to say anymore on climate.
I studied the modeling over 10 years ago, it was obvious to me then what was really going on with climate.
I was expecting a lot more rigor than I found. Orders of magnitude more.
These climate models and scenarios are simply not credible.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

I don’t I am. I don’t think that graph is accurate. There is evidence of human habitation and agricultural activities in areas that are now too cold.
A dedicated globalist will claim it was regional change. Right.
Consider 5 reasons to think about climate differently:

https://t.co/3L2c33JBe7

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

With all due respect - In my opinion, if you want to save the planet from the globalista cabal, it is wise to be accepting of all the Earth’s “service-to-others” religions, spiritual belief systems, world views, and cosmologies.
We are a diverse group. I believe in the re-embodiment of the soul/spirit/consciousness- whatever you decide to call it. Commonly called reincarnation . I know people who consider themselves to be Christian that also believe in it.
I’ve also found evidence that early Christians also believed in it. I know Jewish people that believe in it.
Juan you’ve expressed that you do not believe in it. I think you have accepted doctrine, like many people, without reconsidering or reviewing history and evidence.
Decades of research by the university of Virginia Department of Perceptual studies, proves it- that this is the creator’s plan. The evidence is that strong in my opinion. That’s not why I believe in re-embodiment . I believe in it because I began remembering being before being born here, when I was a teenager. Vague but powerful memories. Also, just from a point of logic, it doesn’t make sense to me that a soul is ready for the human experience without any preparation.
I observed a pair of identical, twins develop completely different personalities, despite having the exact same environment. Where do these differences come from?

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@MikeHudema @exxonmobil @Shell @Chevron @bp_plc There is no climate crisis. Fraudulent computer models are not scientific proof of anything
Consider these arguments

https://t.co/DAxGCwl8Ue

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

Not to mention that the machines themselves can’t be trusted to do accurate tallying.
Until we have real election reforms to deal with the integrity issues, there is no reason to vote. Not in CA anyway

[DC_Draino @DC_Draino]

California voters elect Republicans, and then Democrats figure out how many votes they need to stuff in the machines in the two weeks after the election to steal it.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

We don’t have millions of years of data. Data requires instruments. Instruments have margins of error. We have millions of years of proxy data. All of this data lacks enough precision to justify IPCC claims.
Ice core data is susceptible infiltration and exfiltration. Density of stomata on plant fossils is used to make close guesses of historical CO2 levels. Also has a margin of error. So they cherry pick.
Shame on those that promote the UN global government agenda.
Here’s the best analysis of the IPCC pseudoscience I have observed.

https://t.co/3L2c33JBe7

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

I am an engineer and have been saying the same thing as Elon for about 20 years

[DogeDesigner @cb_doge]

"In person voting with ID, End of Story."

Election integrity starts with voter ID. Without it, democracy fails.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@NoX_Regulat0r @maniaUFO The earth is not flat. I have seen it-
At 42,000 ft altitude in a corporate jet, sitting in the cockpit, and in good weather, the curvature of our planet visible to the naked eye. Flat earth is a psy op

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

Fraudulent computer models are used to predict a nonexistent climate crisis in order to push a political agenda. That’s what has been and is happening.
When an entire scientific field is taken over by a political agenda it ceases to be science and becomes pseudoscience and propaganda. https://t.co/3L2c33JBe7

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@trippfunderburk @robinmonotti Yes, the models, and the many scenarios are fraudulent.

https://t.co/DAxGCwl8Ue

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

It is not just “two among thousands.” There are thousands of scientists who are on the climate realist side.
At least two Nobel laureates have signed the declaration at CLINTEL.
I used to think the IPCC was doing real science, until I analyzed the CMIP models for myself over a decade ago.

https://t.co/3L2c33JBe7

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@FullLengthB @zerohedge Actually sense would be understanding that the entire narrative of emissions caused climate change is based on fraudulent computer models. It is agenda driven pseudoscientific misinformation coming from the UN.

https://t.co/DAxGCwl8Ue

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

The hidden ruling “international banking elites” have been the real power brokers for generations. The publicly visible governments have been in their control one way or another.
If humanity had a clue all their bankers wars would have been avoided.
They brought the Federal Reserve private bank to the US and killed a lot of people to get that accomplished.
Fact- We haven’t finished the 1776 revolution yet. The British Empire is the bankers empire.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

@TheEXECUTlONER_ People merging too soon make the backlog worse. Everyone should be using both lanes until the merge point.

[Verisimilitude @MichaelEPerrone]

The article linked to raises serious questions and reveals significant problems in UN climate process.

[Jim Steele @JimSteeleSkepti]

ONLY ABOUT 200 CLIMATE MODELERS CREATED THE CLIMATE CRISIS SCENARIOS!
OR
WHY ZELDIN’S EPA CORRECTLY REMOVED THE CO2 ENDANGERMENT FINDING

Much of the evidence in this article is from Dr Roger Pielke’s excellent recent blog post The World's Most Important Science Advisory Committee. A must read!
https://t.co/0TXgOGPSll

The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) is the international scientific group under the World Climate Research Program that oversees official projections of climate futures. CMIP scenarios drive the temperature and emissions projections that anchor every Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment. CMIP scenarios also drive sea-level-rise estimates that local governments use to plan coastal infrastructure and shape projections of future climate damages and the “social cost of carbon.”

Those projections also inform the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios that more than 140 central banks and supervisors are required to use to stress-test commercial bank capital requirements. “CMIP projections are not just about science, but about science advice to policymakers in government, business, and civil society.”

The CMIP scenarios are developed by a community of integrated assessment modelers numbering perhaps just two hundred people worldwide, concentrated heavily in just two institutions: the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) outside Vienna, and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) in Germany. It is not surprising that current fear mongering headlines warning CO2 warming will cause freezing via a shutdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation are being published by members of PIK.

These modelers with official responsibility for developing climate scenarios for the IPCC and broader research community have now admitted that their previous extreme scenarios, that have dominated climate research, are implausible, as skeptics have long argued.

But the damage of such bogus scenarios has already been done. Tens of thousands of research papers have been — and continue to be — published using their bad scenarios, while a similar number of media headlines continue to amplify their fears. Governments and international organization built those implausible scenarios into policy and regulations, such as Obama’s endangerment finding, while social media’s useful idiots have further spread climate alarm by spreading their implausible scenarios.

“The modelers new framework has eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades — specifically, RCP8.5, SSP5-8.5, and SSP3-7.0. This is an absolutely huge development in climate science which will have lasting impacts across research and policy.” Indeed “The future is not what it used to be.”

Two institutions in particular play an outsized role in scenario development: IIASA, the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria, and PIK, the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, in Germany. Those 2 institutions are totally inbred, creating the same intellectual deficiencies observed in inbred families.

IIASA, founded in 1972 as a Cold-War scientific-cooperation initiative between the United States and the Soviet Union has been led by Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, who founded PIK in 1992 and ran it for a quarter-century before moving to Vienna to lead IIASA.PIK is now led by economist Ottmar Edenhofer (former IPCC Working Group III co-chair) and earth-system scientist Johan Rockström who are intent on using climate fear to control economies.

A 2025 bibliometric analysis of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) found 10,665 CMIP-related documents (mostly peer-reviewed papers) from 2000 to 2023. For CMIP6 alone (the underpinning much of the IPCC's AR6), the Web of Science records already exceed 13,000 publications by around 2025. Public understanding of climate change is being totally manipulated by just 200 modelers with interests other than science, yet they control funding and bias peer reviewed publications!