Incredible: AI can predict the winner of the 2024 election. Looks like there will be a few surprises; for example, there's a good chance that Iowa will win Texas.
@jblainefoster Think my patients are likely getting on average better care because of it. And it makes my life much easier. So I find the benefits far outweigh the harms at this point. But I hear your concerns. I donβt view this is an argument that needs to be *won* per se.
@jblainefoster Doing the note closer to the time I talked with a patient. Instead of much later in the evening when I find time to sit down and dictate notes. It saves enough time I can do the history between visits. I find this probably improves my accuracy in my notes as Iβve said. For now I
@jblainefoster And last thought: for me it is an accessibility tool. I STRUGGLE with my adhd to get charts STARTED. But once I have overcome the activation energy of words on the paper, itβs much less mentally exhausting/ time consuming to edit the words for accuracy.
@jblainefoster Process and protect ourselves legally, and communicate to other docs, most docs I know are going to be pretty careful about the wording that goes in the chart.
@jblainefoster Thereβs a logical leap in the article where bad transcriptions or ai generated summaries of interviews somehow are being put directly into a chart without human review which I think unlikely. And AI as of yet is not jumping 3 steps ahead of the history and documenting a diagnosis
@jblainefoster The idea of an AI hallucination then creating a false memory for the doc is interesting for sure. This stuff is understandably being used with caution. So far I feel like my notes have been more detailed than they would otherwise be and likely more accurate to the visit.
@jblainefoster Obviously I canβt speak to how it is used everywhere. And surely someone will try to take it too far. I just know that from how Iβve seen it used The article seems to be alarmist about a way that seems reckless, bit not founded in whatβs happening.