Michael Wyatt

Attorney. Programmer. Left, but results matter more than ideology.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@NateSilver538 Let me guess, a wild Rasmussen poll in there? Ah yep, +2. Don’t know how anybody can trust Rasmussen on favorability polls.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@JamieMcIlwraith @NateSilver538 The ceasefire that held for 4 hours? lol no. The only people cheerleading that already approved of him.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@NateSilver538 “15 years” seems generous to me. Obamacare wouldn’t have been watered down so hard if the Democratic Party had a clear direction at that point. Wasn’t new, just a sign of post-Clinton reality.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@TechniGal_Ash @NateSilver538 lol update your outrage - the superdelegate system is gone.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@NateSilver538 *Was* it a fuck up, though? He’s got millions going to bat for him. Good chance his profile is raised even further after this. Not saying it was calculated, but…

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@BillSimmons Bill is all of us this day.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@elonmusk Huh. You care about truth and cozy up to Trump? Weird.

I’d say you must think we’re all dumb, but the last election proves we are.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@Aethelleas @NateSilver538 Well, I’d say Nate’s biggest prediction was that the polls were being doctored one way or another, but so far it looks like they were pretty spot on. Trump +1 everywhere looked suspicious but that’s playing out.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@Tiroshani_Amodo @NateSilver538 lol you finally put New Mexico as blue, huh? What changed your mind? Was it my constant badgering?

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@Equalit43195996 @NateSilver538 He didn’t say that as his final prediction, dipshit. Nate gave Trump higher odds than just about anybody, 30%.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@WHjamming @EricLDaugh He knows there’s data manipulation going on, but not to what extent or which direction. Not really much else he can do. He either uses the data or throws up his hands and puts out nothing.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@TinCanary @Tiroshani_Amodo @NateSilver538 This dude’s model has Trump winning New Mexico and you think it’s more accurate? 😂

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@Constitution_20 @NateSilver538 Do you really think him saying 50.0% is “calling it” for Harris??? How people gonna follow Nate and be some dumb at this?

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@isubbu @NateSilver538 It’s actually more of a difference than that because he lumped in 269-269 ties with a Harris loss.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@Free_Man_Tom @NateSilver538 Use his final forecast, coward.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@JimBlaine @NateSilver538 Almost certainly. But which direction? 🤔

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@mjrieley @NateSilver538 Garbage in, garbage out.

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@NateSilver538 Man I’d love to see the post today that Nate writes in 3 months on the fallout of all this. It’s gonna be Pollapocalype 2024. Pollocalypse?

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@investindigital @NateSilver538 We already have evidence of data herding, why make up an explanation for why they aren’t?

[Michael Wyatt @MichaelSWyattJD]

@Evan_R_Fischer @NateSilver538 Rasmussen. 😂