@scottmelker Consider you cannot spend all of your money b/c you don’t know when you’ll die, which means your asset base will be left behind at some level (the same assets that generate income for you) which from an actuarial standpoint need to be in place until you are 90-120 years old.
@scottmelker It’s not an either/or
You can then mandate that the life insurance proceeds must be used to buy bitcoin.
Spend time drafting a document that carries on your legacy utilizing the insurance company’s money to tap into the 21M.
Otherwise it’s a waste of momentum/ impact.
@scottmelker Yes! Spend it all while you are alive AND leave a large life insurance policy in a “predator protected” trust so that your kids don’t inherit the money outright but can access and interact with the assets under certain conditions and if certain commitments are met.
@BitcoinPierre Pierre- please provide some clarity:
How can you compare an asset that’s been around 17 years to one that’s 5,000 years old. Is this a price consideration or a ROR assessment?
@CryptoTaxFixer Hi Clinton question for you, your last handful of posts have suggested that 2026 will be much more significant as it relates to IRS intervention, please expand on how you feel Tate’s post relates to 2025 versus 2026? Thank you so much.
@KookCapitalLLC “Escaping” - You make a weak assertion, his company is on the NASDAQ, they are adding bitcoin weekly and he is evangelizing for btc all day every day. What are you committed to doing for the network outside of making pointless posts and sarcastic comments?