HOW DO WE STOP THE BOATS?
I get asked this question constantly.
“Send in the Navy!”
“Turn the boats around!”
“Put more patrols in the Channel!”
My opinion is different.
Having spent weeks on the ground in France, watching this unfold with my own eyes, I believe the answer is far simpler.
France has played an absolute blinder.
Conditions in the migrant camps are appalling. Filthy, overcrowded slums that make France look like somewhere nobody wants to stay and Britain look like the land of opportunity.
Clever, when you think about it.
Then comes the next stage.
Buses transporting migrants, gendarmes walking groups towards the beaches like they’re on a school trip, and French vessels accompanying boats across the Channel until British authorities take over.
I’ve documented enough of this to form my own conclusions.
So here’s what I would do.
Stop handing France millions. We’re paying for a system that clearly isn’t delivering.
Detain everyone arriving illegally,
Identify, photograph and document every arrival.
Return every person to France
Invoice France for the costs. Yes, I know they probably wouldn’t pay.
End the perception that arriving illegally guarantees accommodation, financial support and a permanent future in Britain.
Make the journey pointless, and you destroy the smugglers’ business model.
People are paying thousands because they believe reaching British shores is the finish line.
Remove that incentive and why would they keep handing their money to criminal gangs?
I believe crossings could fall dramatically within weeks if that message became a reality.
No Navy warships required. No dangerous confrontations at sea.
Just a government with the backbone to enforce its borders.
It is not racist to believe your country should control who enters it.
It is not racist to demand that immigration laws are enforced.
And it is certainly not racist to believe that the British people and their interests should come first.
I’ve watched this operation from the beaches, the camps and the water.
Throwing more money at France isn’t my answer.
Remove the incentive. Enforce the law. Break the business model.
It’s time to put Britain first.
Burnham has tried to present himself as the sweet guy from next door, but he is now displaying a well calculated, sinister side.
He pledged not to open up the Brexit debate, he lied, now he is stating the result was illegitimate.
All of this to lay down the ground for a GE
Trump: Makes a diesel deal with Putin to bring down prices for Americans.
Europe: “Making deals with dictator Putin is a road to hell! Shameful! Absolutely disgraceful!”
Also Europe: Buys even more Russian gas to keep its own citizens supplied.
Europe, in actual numbers: €7.88 BILLION spent on Russian Arctic LNG in the first nine months of 2026 — 9.5% MORE than the year before.
The biggest buyers? France, the Netherlands, and Portugal.
Apparently, buying energy from Putin is financing a bloody dictatorship — unless you pay in euros.
Same dictator. Same gas money. Different moral standards.
Welcome to Europe, where hypocrisy is renewable, but the gas is Russian.
The destruction of Gaza City resulted from the Israel-Hamas war that began on October 7, 2023. Hamas and allied groups attacked southern Israel that day, killing about 1,200 people (mostly civilians) and taking roughly 250 hostages.
Israel responded with extensive airstrikes and ground operations to dismantle Hamas's military infrastructure, including its extensive tunnel network built under dense urban areas. This urban combat produced widespread damage to buildings and infrastructure across Gaza, with the bulk of the visible destruction occurring between 2023 and the October 2025 ceasefire.
I love this … how do you teach your children not to be socialist.
Ask your child to clean the bathroom. Pay them £10 the. Take £7 off them and give it to their sibling who didn’t do the work.
I bet your child won’t be a socialist for long 💣
Oh.
Now apparently, “it’s clear that Russia meddled in the Brexit referendum.”
Burnham’s new epiphany.
Absolutely anything to portray the leave vote as stupid.
But he’s ok to rig the next election by scrapping voter ID. That’s not “meddling” in an election.
Absolutely sick of him already 🤯🤯
@rebel000000002@WazzupDoc7@Hamza_a96 Just have and if true then yeah Israel are out of order. I wouldn’t however trust any organisation who sides with Palestine/hamas! . If Hamas are hiding in schools, hospitals etc then it’s on their heads!
⚠️ WATCH THIS ⚠️
The police tell local residents that they can't restrict the movements of 300 illegal male migrants who have just been planted in a hotel next to a school because, wait for it,
THEY HAVEN'T COMMITTED ANY CRIMES.
It is a criminal offence under the 1971 Immigration Act to enter the UK without permission, so these people have already committed a crime.
Under section 24 of the Immigration Act 1971, knowingly arriving in the UK without the required entry clearance is a criminal offence.
This specifically covers people intercepted in UK territorial waters and brought ashore.
Facilitating or assisting such arrivals is a more serious offence under section 25.
The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025 added further offences, including endangering the lives of others during a sea crossing, which can carry up to 6 years in prison.
Article 31 of the Refugee Convention provides that refugees should not be penalised for irregular entry if they come directly from a place where their life or freedom was threatened, present themselves without delay, and show good cause.
THERE IS NO WAR IN FRANCE.
Furthermore, France is listed in Schedule 3 of the Asylum and Immigration Act 2004 as a safe country and UK law applies statutory presumptions that a person’s life or liberty would not be threatened there.
When did it become acceptable to completely ignore several laws which have been enacted by parliament and are in force?
@Nigel_Farage, @ZiaYusufUK, @TiceRichard, @LeeAndersonMP_, @policylaila, @GoodwinMJ, @juneslater17, @RaheemKassam, @reformparty_uk
Reform should challenge the government via a judicial review in the High Court for failing to follow their statutory duties.
This is a win win.
If the challenge succeeds, the scam that is the asylum industry comes crashing down.
If it fails, the government will be accused of once again prioritising the rights of illegal migrants over the rights of the British people.