Tokens d̶o̶n̶'̶t̶ capture value.
• Hyperliquid: 97%+ of fees go to buybacks ($2B and counting)
• Pump: Burned 36% of supply, locked 50% of revenue into burns
• Uniswap: Burned 107M UNI, fee switch on
• Aave: Automated buybacks
• Aptos: Hard-capped supply, 10x'd fees, burns them
• Solana: Current proposal to 12-14x the fee burn
The market hasn't repriced this yet.
If you would like to get Fast Tracked into @AlpendHQ go here: https://t.co/mxT0smKLuo
New Supply is "capped off" at the moment but doors could open back up any day!
Already earned 5,120 $CC passively by simply supplying my coins into the lending pool. 😎
Current $CC Supply Rates = 6.28%
Current $USDCx Supply Rates = 17.16%!!!!
Borrow CC back at 3.43% or USDCx back at 11.58%
Talk about a Spread...😉
I can keep it in my Wallet collecting dust...OR! I can supply at Alpend for Yield!
Nothing like free coins Yessah!
**Subsidiary of the @PalladiumLabs conglomerate here so you know your money is safe! 👇
https://t.co/7lmXZRmCgF
@xrpfactory 안녕하세요 팩톡리님 스테이블코인이 결제 인프라로 자리잡으면 XRP의 입지는 작아지는거 아니에요 결귝 스테이블 코인이 XRP의 역할을 대처할수도 있는거죠 물론 유동성 작은곳엡서는 브릿지 자산으로 쓰일수 있지만 과거 XRP가 모든 통화의 브릿지로 사용될수 있다는 서사는 더 이상 통하지 않는거죠
@sentosumosaba@notabene_id When stablecoins become the norm for cross-border payments, some of the features XRP used to do are definitely eroded. In other words, XRP is more likely to remain a role closer to a liquidity link than "money."
@bgarlinghouse 7/7 This is not an XRP price question.
It is a question about whether the original Internet of Value thesis still requires a neutral bridge asset, or whether the future of global payments can evolve beyond that assumption.
@bgarlinghouse 6/7 If alternative architectures succeed in enabling efficient global settlement without requiring a bridge asset, what is Ripple's long-term strategy?
What would remain XRP's unique economic role in that world?