@AdamTriggerWT There should be a line painted in between the fence and pole and problem solved. If there ever was a problem. Very very small chance someone hits a homerun or foul ball in between that doesn’t hit the pole or clearly go fair/foul
@iJordanMoore Troll bait. Leaving the Braves out then saying their okay after you’ve got the pirates the in will be good section… I have no other comment bc this MF is not real
@secnumbersguy No. Don’t change shit. You’re an idiot. It’s pretty simple to get in the tourney from sec. If you can’t win games then you shouldn’t be there. Cry baby mentality. We live for the stories every now and then these games gives us. Fl should be playing an easier game as a 1 to start
@Moore33Gaming Sounds like a crybaby mentality tbh. Buy a 9 if it makes sense…. If you want a 10 bad enough prepare to pull out a lot more cash or be on a search till you get one that can grade that high. I don’t think the gap should be as large as it is but complaining about it? Lame
@wingoz I could see either way honestly. I would probably elect to go for it when you have Puka and davante Adams paired with Stafford. But when you don’t target them on 3rd or 4th down that’s where you lose me. I didn’t like either of the plays they ran
@ckossnumbers@joshfontenot07@CHurls13 Had no idea they came out and said it would be a catch in today’s game… was just going off historical reference okay I can live with that then If they admit the plays were the same.
@TheLandoShow Na 3rd and 2 or less yes run it. Running on 3rd and 4 against a good defense you’re essentially accepting you’ll have a 4th and short.
I would rather go for the end zone twice then run the ball for 0-3 yards and then be forced to qb sneak or one shot to the end zone.
@joshfontenot07@CHurls13 If this is true What about the Des Bryant no catch then cooper kupp doing the same thing last night and it was a catch? Both had
1) possession w 2 steps
2) football move (reaching the ball out for more yards)
Both lose possession through the ground. One is a catch one’s not
@FDSportsbook has fell behind. Literally no reason to use this platform anymore. Most bigger platforms have moved injury insurance to the whole first half. Not FD. Also seen a buddy lose this bet on FD bc of the kneel downs.
@sekrah@Average_Joe67@danorlovsky7 Btw i agree it shouldn’t have been a catch had it just got knocked out and hit the turf it is indisputably incomplete but they have always called it a catch in past plays where both players catch the ball so they need to admit they called those wrong. Btw time has zero to do w it
@danorlovsky7 The ground. If saying cooks didn’t maintain possession through the ground thus INT, okay.
BUT
That should do two things.
1.Mims TD should’ve been incomplete.
2.Admit the Fail Mary and other historical plays that both players catch the ball and it goes to WR were wrong.
@danorlovsky7 It’s just inconsistent. I can live with something being a catch or not a catch on that play. But establish it and call it the same.
-The mims TD I think should be a catch if you set NFL rules aside. But we’ve seen tons of plays be called incomplete from the bobble through