So…I did a thing 😁
Younger me could only dream of running a half-marathon, but before you know it, some dreams are just a hand’s stretch away.
Let’s see where this takes us next 👀 Still more unforgiving minutes and distance runs to come!
#ManilaMarathon2026
One of my New Year’s resolutions was to run a 10K and 12K max. I ran my first 10K in March and somehow survived a 16K earlier today with minimal training (wouldn’t recommend 💀)
Perhaps a half-marathon next year? More unforgiving minutes ahead!
Politeness and common courtesy should remain standard practice.
If you say “please,” “kindly,” or “thank you,” rest assured I’ll attend to it promptly.
But if you give a command or order without courtesy, it won’t be my priority. We shouldn’t tolerate such behavior.
One of my New Year’s resolutions was to run a 10K and 12K max. I ran my first 10K in March and somehow survived a 16K earlier today with minimal training (wouldn’t recommend 💀)
Perhaps a half-marathon next year? More unforgiving minutes ahead!
Ended a taxing midterm week by presenting our group research papers at the Communication Research International Conference (#CRIC2023) and finishing my first race at #TheGreatUPRun.
Fill the unforgiving minute!
This. Didn’t the filing of the fourth complaint precede the “dismissal” of the first three? If so, wouldn’t that mean it isn’t barred by the one-year ban?
As there was no Committee referral here (the standard in Francisco), it provided a new threshold for "initiation" which is "dismissal." What I don't get is, if the first 3 complaints were "initiated" on Feb 5 (the day they were archived) how can they bar a 4th FILED THE SAME DAY?
You were the leader we needed to guide a conservative Church into a progressing world.
Thank you for teaching us to remain steadfast in a seemingly contradictory faith, and for showing us the face of Christ in a grim world.
Pahinga na, Lolo Kiko.
The #SupremeCourtPH has ruled that only the injured spouse – not the one who knowingly entered a bigamous marriage – can ask the court to nullify it.
In a Decision written by Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario, the Supreme Court En Banc denied a Filipina’s petition to declare her second marriage void for being bigamous.
The petitioner first married a Chinese national in Hong Kong and the Philippines. While working in Hong Kong, she had an affair with a Filipino whom she later married when she returned to the Philippines.
Her first husband later obtained a divorce in Hong Kong, which a Parañaque court recognized, effectively dissolving their marriage.
After 14 years, she separated from her second husband and sought to nullify their marriage, arguing that it was void for being bigamous. She also requested permission to remarry.
Denying her petition, the Supreme Court stated that only the aggrieved or innocent spouse from either marriage has the right to petition for the annulment of a second marriage. In this case, it was the petitioner’s first husband who held that right, but he lost it after obtaining a divorce. This right did not transfer to the petitioner, who is considered the guilty spouse.
Read the full text of the Press Release at https://t.co/F88WTZKnww.
Read the full text of the Decision at https://t.co/TDrO0g6vgJ
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ.
John Cena and legendary WWE cameraman, Stu shared a moment at the #RoyalRumble last weekend.
Cena x Stu, a bond that can never be broken. ❤️
Hopefully Stu will get his rightful flowers in Cena’s eventual Hall of Fame speech.