En sån nyhet kanske väcker intresse hos befolkningen att börja läsa på om svamp, när det kommer från älskade Media...😏
Naturen har allt vi behöver så några kemiska kapslar är inte vara nödvändiga...
https://t.co/gFBNkbjSaW
@PeterSweden7 Enligt vittnesmålet användes en mycket ren substans i den kliniska undersökningen före godkännande som var FÖR DYR FÖR MASSPRODUKTION. Befolkningen gavs istället en produkt tillverkad av bakterien Escerichia Coli, dvs. E. Coli - en AVFÖRINGSBAKTERIE. 💩💉
😁😁
”Donald Trump ska diskutera ett amerikanskt Nato-utträde med försvarsalliansens generalsekreterare Mark Rutte i kväll, meddelar Vita husets pressekreterare Karoline Leavitt enligt Reuters.”
I used to think it was important for kids to go to school for socialising purposes but as an adult I don't speak to any of my friends from school and frankly I have no intention of socialising with the majority of humanity.
If I had a kid I wouldn't consider it important for their development to socialise with a bunch of Tik-Tok addicted maxxing/mogging slang-brained NPCs-In-Training who want to influence them into group think.
Socialising in school is just another layer of programming.
“The biggest lie sold to our generation was that leaving your family made you free.”
Tania Khazaal makes a sharp point: For decades, society pushed the idea that true success and empowerment meant leaving home at 18, becoming fully independent, and building life on your own.
The result? One cohesive family unit often turned into five separate households — each paying its own rent, utilities, car payments, and often starting with heavy student debt. Everyone bearing costs alone.
In contrast, multigenerational families that stay connected can share expenses, pool resources, launch businesses together, and actually build generational wealth. When the family unit fractures, each new generation resets to zero — financially, emotionally, and spiritually. The “village” disappears, leaving individuals to survive in isolation.
A clear-eyed look at how cultural messaging around freedom quietly reshaped family structures and long-term economic outcomes.
What resonates (or challenges) you most in this perspective — the hidden economic costs of breaking the family unit, the redefinition of real freedom, or the long-term impact on generational wealth and resilience?
How much conditioning did it take to convince us that:
18 years in school,
50 years at a job,
leaving our children with strangers,
for a few years of freedom at the end is normal,
and questioning it makes you the problem?
🇸🇪🇳🇴🇩🇰🇫🇮🇮🇸 Ännu en artikel i Jämtlands Tidning och etablerad media om negativa konsekvenser av förskrivningen av de amfetaminbesläktade läkemedlen som ges vid ADHD. Även denna gång uttalar sig Läkaruppropets ordförande, barn- och ungdomspsykiatern Sven Román, som behandlat omkring 7 000 barn och ungdomar i barnpsykiatrin.
#adhd #amfetamin #övermedicinering #viktnedgång #personlighetsförändring
https://t.co/OFtYdDqvR4
🇸🇪🇳🇴🇩🇰🇫🇮🇮🇸 Helmut Sterz, tidigare chefstoxikolog vid Pfizer i Europa och ansvarig för alla djurexperiment som gjordes av företagets läkemedel och vaccin, vittnade den 19 mars 2026 i den tyska förbundsdagens coronautredningskommission. Sterz är sammanbiten och allvarlig, och helt skoningslös i sin kritik av detta som vi anser är världens största experiment på mänskligheten.
Videon är fem minuter lång, vilket inte är idealiskt för ett inlägg i sociala medier, men den sammanfattar egentligen allt om konsekvenserna av dessa genbaserade vaccin.
#mRNA #GMO #biovapen #gift #bedrägeri
https://t.co/GQLntZODlL
A quick announcement to the politicians.
There is still an army of people out here who are furious.
Not mildly disappointed. Not vaguely concerned. Furious. Still. After everything that has passed and everything that has been deliberately buried.
Furious about the lockdowns that destroyed businesses, childhoods, and lives built over decades. Furious about the bioweapons that were paraded in front of us as safe and effective while the data that proved otherwise was suppressed, manipulated, and hidden behind legal shields that should never have existed. Furious about the mandates that stripped people of their livelihoods, their autonomy, and their fundamental right to say no to a medical intervention without losing everything.
Furious about the injured who were abandoned. The elderly who died alone. The children who lost years they will never recover. The doctors who were silenced. The scientists who were destroyed. The families that were divided by a manufactured line between the compliant and the questioning.
Furious that not one person responsible has faced a single meaningful consequence.
We have not forgotten.
We have not moved on.
We have not been pacified by time or exhausted into silence.
We are still here. Still watching. Still documenting. Still growing in number as more people wake up to what was done.
I am just saying.
You should probably know that.
(1/2)
"A highly purified substance was used for the clinical trial prior to approval. It was too expensive for mass production. The entire population was administered a vaccine (Comirnaty) that was manufactured using the bacterium Escerichia Coli (E. Coli)..."
Pfizer toxicologist stands in the German Bundestag and says what everyone knew who didn't want to look away.
60,000 additional deaths in temporal connection with the COVID-19 vaccination. Not estimated by fringe thinkers, but the result of a pharmacoepidemiological analysis, presented by an expert who no longer lets himself be fobbed off with the usual "that's complex" platitudes.
The system was simple:
Emergency authorization without long-term data. Pressure instead of enlightenment. Reports of side effects were collected, but not evaluated. The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut documented, but drew no consequences. The Robert Koch-Institut communicated excess mortality in such a way that the numbers fit. Children, young people, pregnant women – everything without sufficient data basis, without legally binding enlightenment, without those responsible ever being asked if they knew what they were doing.
The legal category is called: prohibited human experiments. Not as a comparison, but as a criminal classification. Whoever pushes a novel active substance without sufficient testing into a population and systematically circumvents the statutory duties of pharmacovigilance has crossed the line that is not crossed even in wartime.
The demand is called: Nuremberg Trials. Not as revenge fantasy, but as constitutional state. If the democratic basic order allows state authorities together with private corporations to turn people into test subjects, then this order must account for itself in court.
Some say the comparison with Nuremberg is exaggerated. True. In Nuremberg the perpetrators knew what they were doing. Here they knew it too. They just call it differently.
Credit to @SHomburg
AVSKAFFA Skolplikten!!🛑
inför Lärande Mål🌞
tillåt HEMSKOLNING🇸🇪
"I vissa fall ifrågasätts till och med föräldrarna. Hot om socialtjänst. Misstankar om bristande omsorg.
"I praktiken verkar makten över språket ibland ligga hos den tjänsteman, domare eller myndighet som råkar fatta beslutet, snarare än i en centralt definierad standard. Det är en svaghet som utmanar bilden av Sverige som ett rent lagsamhälle." /Grok