@cfusion75@LoveReality9@gregorykennedy The price did not say for a similar product or a commissioned piece. It was the same price tag as all the other products in the store. They also didn’t offer the twin initially. They told her it wasn’t for sale and offered her a smaller 2k version.
@epictreasure1@newmrpford Ah yes, name-calling when someone has a valid reason to be upset with a business rather than addressing the underlying issue. You seem exactly like the type who would want to shop there.
@AJDelgado13 Well yeah they treated her as less than. The shop had it clearly marked with a price tag that was the same as all the other price tags, then told her it wasn’t for sale and offered something cheaper. Now the shop is claiming its twin IS for sale, but removed the price tag.
@meinkee2024@barristerlawusa She may be a cunt, but the shop was cuntier with their response. First, despite having a clearly marked price tag, it wasn’t for sale, and then its twin IS for sale, and then they remove the price tag from the shop entirely. They can’t even keep their story straight.
@LoveReality9@gregorykennedy Molly IS an automata. If that price tag was for a different product, explain why they have now removed that price tag from the piece? Explain it to me like I’m a fucking idiot.
@LoveReality9@K2Shauna@braydon_bell@gregorykennedy Ok? What’s your point? Asking Ai if something is for sale and it tells you “unsure,” therefore you’d turn to the next piece of evidence which is the actual price tag they even shared multiple time on their own story yesterday.
@DoctorMommy401@beyoncegarden Cool it still clearly had a listed price tag. As sentimental as they’re claiming to be, they still listed old Molly for sale.
@Wejolyn@beyoncegarden That is not how price tags work. No mention of commissions. The price tag is identical to all other price tags in the store. Initially the store claimed not for sale, now magically its twin is for sale? lol they fucked up and can’t even keep their story straight.
@K2Shauna@Dangerbug@beyoncegarden Did you read that post? It’s about how enjoying things in life are their favorite items. Completing a puzzle, being with your friend, etc. That is not a post claiming the bird’s for-sale status.
@IAmJoeSummers@james3rdcomedy Ah yes the item with a clearly marked price tag that is identical to all other price tags in the store magically isn’t for sale. You’re calling people bootlickers while defending a deceptive business practice. Nice.
@K2Shauna@braydon_bell@LoveReality9@gregorykennedy Then don’t list them for sale. If you can’t accommodate the transaction, don’t list the item for sale. It really is that simple. If they’d made it clear it’s a commission piece, fine. But that is not what happened here.
@DanFriedman81 That is against the law. You cannot post a price tag next to an item, with the item’s description, then claim it’s not for sale. That’s not how this works. And now they’ve changed their story saying that the artist had agreed to part with a near-identical bird? They fucked up.
@K2Shauna@braydon_bell@LoveReality9@gregorykennedy Even if you were correct (you’re not), that’s not how business laws work. You don’t get to list an item for sale in store, with a clearly listed price tag, then possibly quote a vague not-for-sale post from a few months ago on your socials and claim innocence.
@K2Shauna@LoveReality9@gregorykennedy Of course she got offended. She went into a store and inquired about buying something with a price tag clearly on the wall next to the item. They turned her down and tried to sell her something cheaper.
@K2Shauna@LoveReality9@gregorykennedy Girl nobody is looking for an online post about items not for sale when they’re actively in a fucking store. She may be an entitled bitch, but they had the tag up in the store, which they have since removed to play innocent.