๐จBRITAIN IS BROKEN: AFGHAN ASYLUM SEEKERS R*PE 15-YEAR-OLD GIRL WHILE SHE SCREAMS FOR HELP ON CAMERA! ๐ฑ๐ก
The Footage Was So Horrific That Barristers Warned It Could Spark Riots If Released To The Public ๐ค
What have our politicians done to this country? Two 17-year-old Afghan asylum seekers, Jan Jahanzeb and Israr Niazal, small-boat arrivals housed by the taxpayer, lured an intoxicated 15-year-old British girl into a park in Leamington Spa.
They dragged her away from her friends, forced her into a secluded spot, and r*ped her while she desperately screamed "help", "please let me go" and "I want to go home".
Her own phone footage captured the nightmare: cries for mercy, a hand clamped over her mouth, explicit protests, all played in Warwick Crown Court.
It was so shocking that one of the defence barristers warned the public seeing it could lead to riots. Yet these monsters only got 10 years 8 months and 9 years 10 months in youth detention, with a mere recommendation for deportation.
This horror could have been avoided.
Our leaders have long pushed unchecked mass migration through both illegal crossings and expansive legal pathways, putting our daughters and communities at risk every single day.
They now talk tough on immigration and claim to be cracking down, yet huge numbers of migrants continue to arrive, whether slipping across the border illegally or entering through still-active legal visa and parole programs.
All the strong rhetoric amounts to little more than lip service when the overall flow of people keeps coming without real, sustained reductions in both categories.
How many more innocent girls must suffer before they actually do something serious to stop it?
@grok@elonmusk well lets go through this. i just asked to make elon do a normal backflip - u decided to make him to a triple contorted impossible flip, with extra people coming into the group.
different definitions of perfect.
@emilymiller@GOP_is_Gutless@Support@nikitabier emily, ur position ur taking is a little bit wonky. He credited you. It's social media. If you dont want people steal your content, then credit you, stay offline pls.
Ed Davey has just said that I am โaiding and abettingโ the destruction of his country.
Heโs right. Restore Britain is going to destroy his version of our country. And we will replace it with one that works for British men and women, and them only.
It will be glorious.
Mr. Zelensky,
I have reviewed your open letter dated 4 June 2026. I shall respond directly and candidly, as the situation between our countries demands clarity rather than theatrical appeals.
You begin by referencing the early years of my leadership and claim that relations between Russia and Ukraine have shifted from civilian cooperation to conflict solely due to my choices. This is a distortion of history. The turning point was the unconstitutional coup d'รฉtat in Kyiv in February 2014, which overthrew the legitimately elected President Viktor Yanukovych. This event was not a spontaneous expression of popular will but a violent power grab, facilitated by external forces and involving radical nationalist elements. The agreements brokered with European mediators were immediately discarded by the coup plotters. Russia has consistently warned against the consequences of such destabilization, including the marginalization of Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine and the erosion of the rights guaranteed under the Ukrainian constitution.
Subsequent developments only compounded these issues. The post-coup authorities pursued policies that deepened internal divisions, disregarded the Minsk Agreementsโintended to provide a peaceful framework for resolving the situation in Donbasโand aligned Ukraine increasingly with external military structures. The population of Crimea made its choice through a referendum to reunite with Russia, exercising its right to self-determination in response to the chaos in Kyiv. The conflict in Donbas arose from the refusal of the Kyiv regime to honor commitments to decentralization and the protection of linguistic and cultural rights.
Regarding your own ascent to power, Mr. Zelensky, it occurred within the framework of a political system shaped by the 2014 events. You presented yourself as an outsider committed to peace and anti-corruption, yet the regime over which you preside has continued policies of confrontation, suppression of opposition voices, and reliance on external patronage. The persistence of serious corruption scandals, media control, and restrictions on political pluralism under your leadership has been widely noted, both domestically and internationally. This is not the foundation for stable statehood or genuine negotiation.
You speak of Ukrainian resilience and losses on both sides. Russia mourns every life lost in this conflict, which we did not initiate. Our special military operation was launched in February 2022 as a necessary response to an escalating threat: the militarization of Ukraine, the failure to implement Minsk, and the clear trajectory toward NATO integration that would place advanced military infrastructure directly on Russia's borders, endangering our security. We have repeatedly expressed readiness for dialogue based on respect for Russia's legitimate interests, the neutralization of Ukraine, recognition of new territorial realities, and the protection of the rights of Russian-speaking citizens.
Your proposal for a direct meeting, while framed as a gesture toward peace, appears more as an exercise in public relations than a substantive offer. Russia has never refused negotiations in principle. However, meaningful talks cannot proceed under conditions of ultimatums, continued Western military support aimed at prolonging the conflict, or attempts to dictate terms that ignore the root causes. A genuine ceasefire and political settlement require:
Formal recognition of the territorial realities that have emerged as a result of the events since 2014, including the status of Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia regions as integral parts of the Russian Federation.
Legal guarantees of Ukraine's neutral, non-bloc status, precluding its membership in NATO or any military alliances hostile to Russia.
Demilitarization and denazification measures to ensure that threats to Russia and the Russian-speaking population do not re-emerge.
Lifting of anti-Russian sanctions and restoration of normal economic and humanitarian ties.
Comprehensive protection of the rights and security of all residents of Ukraine, including through constitutional reforms.
These positions are not new; they reflect the minimum conditions necessary to prevent future conflicts and to establish lasting peace. Russia remains open to serious discussions through established channels, potentially involving mediators who demonstrate impartiality. However, we will not entertain formats designed primarily to secure additional Western military aid or to buy time for rearmament.
The people of Russia support the objectives of our operation and the protection of our compatriots. We are prepared for a long-term resolution but prefer a negotiated one that addresses fundamental security concerns. History will judge not only the events of 2014 and their aftermath but also the choices made by current leaders in Kyiv.
The path to ending hostilities lies in realism and mutual respect for the security interests of all parties involved, rather than in continued reliance on external intervention or one-sided narratives.
Vladimir Putin President of the Russian Federation