@HarginFlargin@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews It doesn't have to and it won't all be protected land. This is a huge landmass and it will take 1000+ years before the majority of it is developed, assuming the country survives that long. Technology will be incomprehensibly more advanced by then. Wildlife isn't going anywhere.
@HarginFlargin@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews The harsh reality is that as the population keeps growing, existing open land will need to be transformed for human consumption, as like it or not, we put our species first. I am sure these same conversations were had 100's of years ago when our current cities were being built.
@HarginFlargin@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews It is certainly a choice to compare human beings who paid money to buy the land/house... with wild animals. I don't see how its inherently bad for individual states to manage their own protected land. If the country is to continue advancing, we will need to expand infrastructure.
@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews This tough guy act is so pathetic. Classic example of something that wouldn't occur in reality outside of a screen. Why did you even respond in the first place if there was never any good intentions? Just a massive waste of time and energy for what...
@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews This is an objectively insane comment to make towards someone trying to have a civil conversation about a misleading post. I suppose that's what I get for attempting to debate with the lovely inhabitants of this cesspool of a social media account lmao. Thanks for your input...
@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews I'm sure you believe Trump himself came up with this change because he hates nature and wants every living thing on the planet to have a painful death, but I can assure you whatever group of people did this had some valid reasoning... the future wildlife of America will be ok.
@Makeyaquakelol@factpostnews Nowhere does it say that you can legally kill endangered animals like the original post claims. Try it yourself and see what happens lol... this simply gives states the ability to make their own habitat protection laws. Must the federal government have their hands on everything?
@ATweetThing@atrupar I don't think something as important as voting for the future of the country should be easy as pie believe it or not. If you can't dedicate one hour of time out of an entire year to obtain a simple ID, I don't want them voting since they obviously don't take it serious enough...
@alecsbutt @americanbink @PopBase Every single murder is tragic and the killer should be executed, but you clearly don't understand that one cannot stop US citizens from committing crimes; while simply enforcing basic immigration laws can prevent excess unnecessary deaths from people who shouldn't be here at all.
@therealraduque@harryjsisson It feels that way... "Hey everyone look at this nearly 50 year old story of someone committing a horrific act of violence; and they happen to be a member of the political party I disagree with. That means the other 50 million+ members support this and deserve death!" So pathetic.
@TheAthletic@TheAthleticMLB Lmao... wear the silly rainbow hat to make the sensitive cattle happy or face unending condemnation from your employer trying to profit off of their crazed need for affirmation.