PATTERN OF DISCRIMINATION
The SAME female Fort Worth cop who recently threatened to ticket Christian preachers for "offensive" speech stopped other Christians from attending a Pride event in 2025
She also threatened potential arrests for using "offensive" speech.
This cop is discriminating against Christians and infringing on 1st Amendment rights.
She needs to be FIRED
@RadioGenoa A Moroccan footballer literally recited a surah from the Quran while shouting "Allahu Akbar."
As stated in the Quran: "When you meet the unbelievers, strike their necks" (Surah 47:4) and "strike their necks" (Surah 8:12).
Is this the religion of peace or piece ?
The Police here are literally there to protect a migrant rapist
The state are employing them to arrest native Brits furious that these people have been place din our communities
It's disgusting what has happened to our country
The Constitution's Patent Clause has two halves. Every schoolchild learns the first half: inventors get exclusive rights to their discoveries.
https://t.co/mUdw456Vuu
Almost nobody remembers the importance of the second half: those rights last only for "limited Times." Then the invention belongs to you.
This week's featured article is unlike anything I've published. It's barely an article at all. It's a picture book — 22 panels, five acts, running from George Washington's signature on the Patent Act of 1790 to a courtroom case that doesn't exist yet.
In the panels you'll meet the saddle patents that stretched a frontier rider's day from 20 miles to 40. You'll see two photographs of congressional committee rooms — one from 1949, one from 2013 — and learn why the difference between them helped move an estimated $22 trillion out of American households. You'll discover why bootleggers and Baptists show up in a story about tractors. And you'll see the one American industry where the patent bargain still works exactly as the Founders designed it. That contrast alone is worth the visit.
Skeptical? Good. So I built a test. I put the constitutional question — does "limited Times" still mean limited? — to eleven independent AI systems, including OpenCase, the retrieval-grounded legal research platform attorneys trust precisely because it cites real cases instead of inventing them. Eleven out of eleven reached the same conclusion: there is a genuine constitutional problem here, and no court has ever squarely ruled on it. You can read every prompt and every answer, then run the open-book exam on any AI you choose. The first comment tells you where.
The picture book takes about fifteen minutes. If you've ever wondered why a new pickup costs $80,000 while a calculator costs $8 — same expired patents, same country — the answer is in the panels. What was promised. What we got. And who can get it back.
Link to the exam material is in the first comment.