ً

Fight or be forgotten.

[jack @jacknuked]

https://t.co/movrNZBN5i

[0xSammy @0xSammy]

https://t.co/Dovp5iadVf

[spyzer @spyzer]

Thesis on $Ratspeak // 710k mcap, age 8d 12h // 570k 24h volume

0xf1e9baa65d418a9025e1851dd2d37f1ad208bba3

Pls claim bro meta done the right way?
—
What it is; people want privacy + communication should still work during outages (/disasters), censorship, poor internet connectivity or when traditional platforms fail.

Ratspeak is the solution to that. A fully open-source encrypted messaging stack built on Reticulum which is a mesh networking protocol that routes messages over LoRa radio, TCP, Bluetooth, I2P or any other available physical medium. (Instead of relying entirely on the internet)

No DNS, no IP, no central server that can be seized/shut down.

= no accounts, no phone numbers, no company in the middle = full privacy.

Your identity on there is a cryptographic keypair you generate yourself. Think of it like a padlock only you have the key to. Every other messaging platform you use have central systems. Signal trusts AWS, Whatsapp > Meta, Telegram > Telegram. They are centralized, and thus you have a dependancy problem.
—-
About the dev ;

Eight years building in crypto (eth mainly). Worked at @KyberNetwork , @aave & @BuildaProtocol before. I read his article he posted on the token and he sounded very genuine and passionate about his project.

He built Ratspeak entirely unpaid & when he revealed his project to the public people launched tokens. Initially he had a defensive reaction— which makes sense when you get spammed to claim/endorse everywhere. Eventually he educated himself & a community formed around his project organically— then $10,000 in fees appeared. He already burned like 2% tokens from circulation (burning = permanently deleting them, reducing supply) and committed to only using wETH trading fees to fund development. The tokens from fees are burned.

He also released a governance platform for the holders today which shows he genuinely cares about bringing value back to the token. That’s why I eventually bought. He seems like a good guy (read his pinned article on the token @defidude)

Embracing the token, being transparent about it’s usecases, doing his best to build those usecases and give the community a reason to invest in the token -> he’s getting more fees to build his passion project = win-win

That's the dev profile.
—-
Core products
(He’s been working on this for months before bringing it to the public)

> Flagship Ratspeak app (v1.0.6+) -> a full cross-platform end-to-end encrypted messaging app (file, image, delivery receipts, p2p voice calls)
> Flashable firmware to turn cheap ESP32 devices into portable mesh nodes with an in-browser setup tool that requires zero coding.
>…

“Only reading pages of docs will make your eyes open wide”
—-
TLDR; Privacy narrative. The scale & technicality of this project. Genuine dev. Passion project. And the token is embraced well.

+ The narrative gets stronger every time the world reminds you why you shouldn't trust centralized platforms with your ability to communicate.

Higher it.

NFA. DYOR. Follow for more 🫡

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

@DuoEthan @tinyhumansai In what areas is your project different/better that similar project like openhuman, @rei_labs or @odei_ai ?

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

Current LLMs are amnesiacs. They are brilliant conversationalists with zero long-term memory.

@tinyhumansai fixes this fundamental flaw by building a local-first "Memory Tree" that turns AI from a chatbot into a persistent digital companion.

[Virtuals Protocol @virtuals_io]

finding deltas between prediction market prices and source-based reasoning

- cool terminal from @ArAIstotle

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

And most importantly, for trenchers, it has community token on base.

0x38298138DD4389013962d8492FEAa5879408DBA3

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

Yesterday, OpenHuman surpasses hermes agent on @StarHistoryHQ

https://t.co/iXfwvpc6TH

[Steven Enamakel @senamakel]

OpenHuman has surpassed Hermes Agent @NousResearch on @StarHistoryHQ

[Dennis Yap @ye_dennis]

I’ve been sharing about the Truth Terminal Prediction analytics with @aweigend who said he was impressed with its ability to help disambiguate Prediction Market Resolutions. Also got my friends who work in sovereign wealth, prop trading, quant trading excited about @PoodleFi_’s example below.

Do you know that the Frontier AI labs are also struggling to overcome this problem without as elegant a solution as we have patented? Can you imagine how much data has to be collected about you to contextualize your use of ambiguous phrases well?

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

The most expensive lie in crypto isn't diamond hands or always take profit, it's the idea that there's one right answer to every trade.

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

@WatcherGuru

[「 𝕲𝖔𝖔𝖓」 @goon_crypto]

How I made 193% on @Polymarket using @ArAIstotle truth terminal.

The crowd had YES at 56.5%.

ArAIstotle had YES at 15%.

So i bought NO at 34 cents. It settled at 99.5 cents.

193% return.

Here is exactly how it happened and why the crowd got it wrong.

The market was "US x Iran diplomatic meeting by April 22, 2026."

Most traders saw peace talk headlines and bought YES. Oil prices were moving. Mixed signals on US-Iran negotiations were flooding the news. The crowd felt like something was happening.

ArAIstotle did not trade the feeling. It read the contract.

The resolution rules are strict. The meeting must be in-person. It must be between official representatives authorised to negotiate. It must be publicly acknowledged by either government or confirmed by credible media. Phone calls do not count. Remote meetings do not count. Brief encounters do not count.

ArAIstotle scanned 4,000+ news sources and found two things:

➜ The April 16 ceasefire extension talks added mild YES pressure. But no finalised deal existed.

➜ Iran was threatening to retaliate over a US ship seizure on the same week. That is not a government moving toward a formal diplomatic meeting.

Then it ran the risk scores.

➜ Resolution Risk Index: 65 out of 100, rated Elevated.
⇁ The resolution criteria had multiple source dependencies and ambiguous terms the crowd never looked at.

➜ Resolution Fragility Score: 78 out of 100, rated High.
⇁ Even if a meeting happened, it was vulnerable to being disputed under the exact resolution wording.

The crowd was pricing a loose read of the question. ArAIstotle was pricing the specific words that determine the payout.

That gap is where the trade lived. A 41.5-point divergence between crowd and ArAistotle. That is not noise. That is a signal.

Most people on Polymarket never open the resolution rules. They trade vibes, headlines, and price momentum. That is why the crowd gets it wrong on resolution-sensitive markets again and again.

Do you actually read the resolution criteria before placing a bet? Or are you just following the price?

This is not about being smarter than the crowd. It is about being more precise. ArAIstotle does the precision work for you.

The next time you see a divergence between crowd and @ArAIstotle, go read the resolution rules before you place anything.

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

The project's fundamental value rests on its ability to execute on Phase 5 (final and most advanced phase, mechanism that transforms the AI from a "rule-follower" into a "true partner.")

DYOR before aping, degen

docs: https://t.co/5i4ebmKhsw

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

Current AI models are fundamentally flawed because they are stateless and reactive, they reset every session, require constant prompting, and optimize for engagement rather than user outcomes

There is currently one project in good R/R ratio which solves this problem

@odei_ai🧵

[ً @MimirOfCrypto]

Implication: The AI can distinguish between "Pete from HS" and "Pete my brother" because it understands the graph of your life, not just keywords

Portability: Memory is stored locally and it is exportable, this prevents vendor lock-in, a key differentiator from OpenAI or Google

[Plata @platacrypto]

https://t.co/we4VE6caxw

[Mercury @TraderMercury]

I don’t short.

I’m here for the upside. I believe in crypto longterm, and think this industry has more asymmetric opportunities than any other sector of finance

I am so sorry if your experience in the recent bullmarket doesn’t reflect that belief, as we ran a coin to $5b valuation based the thesis that “the dog has a hat”, but…

skill issue.

this is the only place where people can farm airdrops for entirely free, and then be (rightfully) underwhelmed when they’re ONLY rewarded with low-5 figures

that’s amazing.

so it inherently feels counterintuitive to bet on downside

not to mention that getting stopped out on shorts makes it significantly harder to find good long entries for the moves that actually matter - not just in practice, but also psychologically.

but there’s even more to it: I should also point out that I’m in it for the long-run

where most in crypto are [likely] attempting to ‘get rich quick’, my system needs longer time horizons for favorable variance to reward me long-term

so the goal is longevity, not ‘making it’ in a year, or in a bullrun.

making it is a side-effect,

and burnout is real.

I’ve traded this market for almost 9 years now.

if you’re familiar with the feeling of mania: you can attest that at some point there comes a time where you confide in your friends, near the highs, that you’d actually prefer the market to slowdown / selloff

bull markets are incredibly draining. no matter how much money you’re making at the time, there’s a higher magnitude of manual effort necessary in order to efficiently extract value from the market

you’re either “locked in” or missing out.

one must stay in tune with the market in hopes of catching the latest news/narrative, rotation, memecoin, or managing positions effectively

and there’s a sense of guilt for NOT spending 12-16 hours a day at the screens in that kind of environment

so why then, would I put in the same amount of effort and energy, for the downside?

the reason why I started trading in the first place was to escape the matrix of the average 9-5, not to work 80 hours at a computer desk for the rest of my life

this ‘long-only’ mindset gets criticized frequently by other traders (grown men on the internet that genuinely get upset at how other grown men trade)

but it’s been the thing that has provided me the most peace throughout the years

by the time the infrequent rallies, which even somewhat resemble a bullmarket, are presented once again: I’m refreshed and ready to go

furthermore, the longer I’ve forced myself to adhere to this mindset, the more content I’ve become with it

avoiding significant drawdown periods, preserving capital, and therefore increasing purchasing power for subsequent rallies, has always proven to be sufficient

and I’ve found myself frothing at the idea of exponentially lower prices just as much as I daydream about exponentially higher prices, even though only one of those scenarios directly benefits me in the short-term.

I hope you’ve enjoyed the read.

Much love and goodluck🖤