Horseshoe theory of female sexuality: the conservative prude says a good woman must deny her own desire. The slut says a liberated woman must override her own selectivity. One moralizes abstinence, the other moralizes availability. Both, conveniently, benefit men. And both ultimately oppose the same thing: a woman deciding for herself who gets access to her, when, and on what terms.
im gen z but why does everything need an app and wifi. i dont want 20000 apps on my phone just to turn on and off my washing machine. i dont want to use 29389384 diff apps for restaurants. i dont wanan use an app to refill my perscriptions
Girls will be girls. Her life shouldn't be derailed over such a mistake, she has a long future ahead of her. One mistake shouldn’t turn a young life into a public execution for everyone else’s satisfaction.
가련한 피해자ㅋㅋ 돈벌이 수단ㅋㅋ 접근ㅋㅋ
그런 사람 있긴 하겠지죠 인간은 다양하니까
근데 이런 글을 양해들 인용으로 쓰는 의도가 뭔가요? 피해자들 도와주는 단체인데 동떨어진 이야기를 하면서 은근슬쩍 해외 가서 좆놀리고 튀어서 양육비도 안 주는 싸튀충 한남은 뒷전이 되어버리잖아용
@zapatas_mom 여자에게 돈과 선물 비유를 하는데 여자에게 바치는 남자일수록 "좋다"고 하지 "헤픈남자"라곤 안하죠.
그러나 남자에게 있어 여자의 섹스는 "빨리 섹스하자, 어라, 정말 빨리 하다니 너 너무 쉬워. 걸레같아" 인 것.
그래서 여자는 잘 보일 필요없는 남자에게 빨라지죠. 아이러니하게도.
Everyone gets why women slot some men for casual sex and others for longer term, and yes men do the same thing. But when men do this they are giving the longer term women their resources and taking on responsibilities for them. The short-term women are obviously getting gipped.
It is the opposite scenario when women do this. They are giving sex - which is the prime variable most men are after in a woman - away with no expectations; meanwhile they are making the guys they want a future with, both wait and do more to get it. This "moral hazard" is only mitigated if a woman does much more for her boyfriend in other domains vs her casual partners, but the reality is - because this is how women are wired - the opposite usually occurs. The more invested a man is, the more he is supposed to do for her, and less inclined she feels to do for him (because she already has him).
It is a tragic thing, because I know what women want most of all is to be cherished by the man they love. But in order to be cherished by a man, the man must feel the woman is special and precious to him. Love requires admiration. And this elevation of a woman becomes very difficult if a man knows that she's been around the block, especially if she's gone there fast with everyone except him.
I know you're trying to rationalize this opportunism to men on behalf of women, and I understand women actually DO care more about the long term guys usually. But the bottom line is telling someone they should pay more and get less because they're more valuable to you isn't persuasive. It's actually retarded and narcissistic. There are some women who are vivacious and witty, who are sweet and supportive and fascinating be around. These women can get away with waiting on their terms, because they have personalities and other value added. They are desirable for more than just sex. But far too many women frankly aren't. They are boring and simple. The most valuable thing they have to offer is sex, yet they are haughty and try to overprice it with the only guys who were interested in buying to begin with. Stupid and self-defeating doesn't begin to describe it.
Women are well within their rights to sleep with who they want when they want. This was the promise of feminism, and it was fulfilled. But you cannot have your cake and eat it too; you cannot treat your body as sacred when you've profaned it repeatedly. There are consequences to using your freedom irresponsibly, including losing forever the love you took for granted you'd one day get.