AlpaCat

A concerned Libertarian observer of this modern, never ending war on the individual.
Mostly collecting info.

[AlpaCat @MindCanon]

“The surest way to corrupt a youth: Instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.”-Nietzsche

[VoxPopuli @vpopulimedia]

🇬🇧 "We need to SAVE the NATION and I think Rupert Lowe is the ONLY vehicle to do that"

@WillColeshill interviews more activists on Restore Britain's campaign trail in Makerfield.

[Tobias Ulbrich @AnwaltUlbrich]

Späte Wahrheit aus dem Spitzenjournal

Was eine neue Nature-Studie über mRNA-Impfstoffe enthüllt — und was sie für Impfgeschädigte bedeutet

Ein Kommentar zum neuen Aufsatz: https://t.co/QD8jGQU29V

Sechs Jahre nach dem weltweiten Roll-out der mRNA-Impfstoffe räumt die etablierte Wissenschaft ein, was Betroffene, kritische Mediziner und unabhängige Forscherinnen seit Langem aussprechen - die Funktionsweise dieser Impfstoffe wurde von Beginn an fundamental missverstanden. Wer das bislang sagte, galt als Außenseiter. Heute steht es im Nature Biotechnology.

Der Paukenschlag aus dem Mount Sinai

Am 29. April 2026 veröffentlichten Forschende um Prof. Brian D. Brown, Direktor des Icahn Genomics Institute am Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, die Arbeit

„mRNA vaccine immunity is enhanced by hepatocyte detargeting and not dependent on dendritic cell expression" (Marks et al., DOI: 10.1038/s41587-026-03099-z).

Der Seniorautor selbst fasst die Tragweite in einer Offenheit zusammen, die aufhorchen lässt:

„Diese Studie verändert grundlegend, wie wir denken, dass mRNA-Impfstoffe funktionieren."

Und an anderer Stelle: „Das war unerwartet." — sechs Jahre nach milliardenfacher Anwendung am Menschen.

Was die Studie tatsächlich zeigt

Die Forschenden konnten im Tiermodell nachweisen, dass die in Lipid-Nanopartikeln verpackte mRNA keineswegs nur in den dafür vorgesehenen Immunzellen exprimiert wird. Stattdessen produzieren in erheblichem Umfang:

Skelettmuskelzellen (Myozyten) am Injektionsort
Leberzellen (Hepatozyten), weil Lipid-Nanopartikel eine ausgeprägte „Hepatotropie" aufweisen — eine Eigenschaft, die das Mount-Sinai-Team ausdrücklich als bekannten Befund beschreibt

Endothelzellen,

Makrophagen und

weitere Zelltypen

Damit nicht genug. Die Studie demonstriert in vivo, dass antigen-spezifische CD8-T-Zellen die eigenen Leberzellen angreifen, wenn diese das vom Impfstoff kodierte Antigen exprimieren. Die Forscher dokumentierten:

1. massive T-Zell-Infiltration ins Lebergewebe (rund 1.100 CD8-T-Zellen pro mm²)

2. signifikant erhöhte Leberwerte ALT und AST — die klassischen klinischen Marker für Leberzellschädigung

3. eine deutliche Zunahme apoptotischer Zellen (Caspase-3-Spaltung)

Die Autoren formulieren in der Diskussion mit bemerkenswerter Direktheit:

„Es kann jedoch sein, dass auch bei RNA-LNP-Behandlungen in der Mehrfachdosis- oder CAR-T-Zell-Anwendung Muskel- oder Hepatozyten-Schädigungen auftreten, die schwer zu detektieren sind, aber den therapeutischen Index begrenzen, indem sie die Dosisgrenze nach oben drücken."

Im Klartext: Schäden können entstehen — sie sind nur schwer zu finden. Das ist etwas grundlegend anderes als die seit Jahren wiederholte Formel „sicher und wirksam".

Späte Bestätigung für die Kritiker

Über Jahre wurden Wissenschaftler und Ärztinnen, die genau diese Mechanismen — Off-Target-Expression in Nicht-Immunzellen, Kreuzpräsentation, T-Zell-vermittelte Gewebsschädigung — thematisierten, abgewertet, ihre Manuskripte abgelehnt, ihre Stimmen in den Leitmedien marginalisiert.

Heute steht in einem der renommiertesten biotechnologischen Fachjournale der Welt:

Sie hatten in der Sache recht.

Besonders pikant ist, dass die zentralen Mechanismen von den Mount-Sinai-Autoren wiederholt als „unerwartet" und „überraschend" beschrieben werden. Wenn führende Spezialisten 2026 überrascht sind — was hätten Behörden, Hersteller und Politik dann 2020 und 2021 mit gebotener wissenschaftlicher Demut kommunizieren müssen, bevor hunderte Millionen Menschen geimpft wurden?

Was bedeutet das für Impfgeschädigte?

Für die wachsende Zahl von Menschen, die nach einer mRNA-Impfung gesundheitliche Schäden geltend machen — von hepatologischen Auffälligkeiten über Myokarditiden bis zu autoimmunen Verlaufsformen — liefert die Studie wissenschaftliche Anhaltspunkte, die in laufenden zivil- und sozialgerichtlichen Verfahren Beachtung verdienen:

1. Die Biodistribution war unzureichend charakterisiert.Die Autoren stellen wörtlich fest, dass „die zelluläre Expressionsverteilung von mRNA-LNPs beim Menschen kaum charakterisiert ist und je nach Formulierung, Dosis, Applikationsweg und weiteren Faktoren variieren wird."

Im Klartext landet der Impfstoff dort, wo keiner weiß, welche Zellen wie lange das Antigen produzieren und niemand untersuchte es vor der Massenanwendung, obgleich es zich klare Indikatoren gab.

2. Off-Target-Expression ist Realität. Die seinerzeit verbreitete Vorstellung, mRNA-Impfstoffe blieben „lokal" am Injektionsort und würden rasch abgebaut, ist mit dieser Arbeit endgültig erledigt. Antigen wird in Leber und Muskel produziert — und die Immunantwort kann sich gegen diese Gewebe richten.

3. T-Zell-vermittelte Organschäden sind kein Phantom.Die Studie zeigt experimentell, dass aktivierte CD8-T-Zellen Leberzellen abtöten, die das Impf-Antigen tragen, und löst damit Leberenzymanstiege aus. Dass vergleichbare Prozesse beim Menschen — insbesondere bei Mehrfach-Boostern — ablaufen können, lässt sich nicht mehr seriös bestreiten.

4. Die Standard-Auskunft verliert an Tragkraft.Das Argument „klinisch wurden keine relevanten Leber- oder Muskeltoxizitäten berichtet" verliert seinen entlastenden Wert, wenn die Studienautoren selbst einräumen, dass solche Schäden „schwer zu detektieren" sein können.

Wissenschaft korrigiert sich — die Politik schweigt weiter
Die Mount-Sinai-Gruppe schlägt eine technische Lösung vor. Mit sogenannten miRNA-Target-Sites (miRTs) ließe sich die mRNA-Expression gezielt aus den Leberzellen heraushalten. Im Tumormodell führte dies zu deutlich verbesserter Wirksamkeit und deutlich reduzierter Lebertoxizität.

Das ist ein wichtiger Fortschritt für künftige Impfstoff- und Therapieentwicklungen — und es ist zugleich ein implizites Eingeständnis: Die bereits Milliarden Mal verabreichten Präparate verfügen über diese Sicherheitsfunktion nicht.

Offen bleiben die unbequemen Fragen:

Warum wurde die Diskussion über Off-Target-Effekte und Kreuzpräsentation jahrelang abgewürgt?

Wer trägt Verantwortung dafür, dass essentielle Mechanismen erst Jahre nach der Massenanwendung systematisch erforscht werden?

Welche Konsequenzen ergeben sich für Aufklärung, informierte Einwilligung und Produkthaftung?

Wann beginnt eine ernsthafte, systematische Aufarbeitung der dokumentierten Nebenwirkungs- und Schadensfälle?

Eine ehrliche Sprache wäre ein Anfang
Die Nature-Biotechnology-Arbeit ist keine Anti-Impf-Streitschrift, sondern peer-reviewte Spitzenforschung einer der renommiertesten medizinischen Einrichtungen der USA. Gerade deshalb wiegen ihre Befunde schwer. Für Betroffene, ihre Anwältinnen und Anwälte und alle, die eine ehrliche Aufarbeitung einfordern, liefert sie einen wissenschaftlich belastbaren Bezugspunkt.

Was Impfgeschädigte seit Jahren erleben — Erschöpfung, Leberwertveränderungen, kardiale Befunde, autoimmune Phänomene — ist mit einem Mal anschlussfähig an die Sprache des Top-Journals: „unexpected", „dampens the response", „cell killing", „hepatocyte damage", „limit the dose ceiling".
Es wird Zeit, dass auch Gesundheitsbehörden, Politik und mediale Leitorgane diese Sprache verstehen — und das Mantra „sicher und wirksam" durch eine offene, evidenzbasierte und für die Betroffenen anschlussfähige Debatte ersetzen.

Quelle: Marks A., Siu S., Bianchini F. et al., mRNA vaccine immunity is enhanced by hepatocyte detargeting and not dependent on dendritic cell expression, Nature Biotechnology, 29. April 2026, DOI: 10.1038/s41587-026-03099-z. Open-Access-Publikation (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

[Kevin McKernan @Kevin_McKernan]

This is the real reason why your AI models hallucinate citations.

It’s to break traceability on training.

This is also why the AI models should work with Sci-Hub to rug pull all the parasitic journals.

[Tim Murdock @eurorabbit]

BlackPilled did a great simulation on what really occurs (and is occurring) as Whites try to help everyone indiscriminately.

[Dudes Posting Their W’s @DudespostingWs]

A Polish engineer, Tomasz Patan, built the Volonaut Airbike, basically a real-life Star Wars speeder bike. Reaches up to 124 mph. Insane

[Edward Dutton @jollyheretic]

High IQ ✅

Critical reader ✅

Lazy ✅

Add Parallax to your Chrome browser.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Bryan, getting “Tdap because Kate’s family has a newborn” is contrary to the evidence. This is because those vaccinated for pertussis are more likely to spread this pathogen.

Why? Two reasons. First, those vaccinated are less likely to have symptoms if infected with the pertussis bacterium but the bacterium still multiplies in their nasopharynx and they then unknowingly spreading it to others (instead of showing symptoms and knowing to isolate). Not science fiction—the hard cold facts as detailed below.

Second, and this makes the reality even worse, because after an unvaccinated person has been infected with pertussis (and is more likely to have symptoms and stay in bed) that person won’t get infected again for many years – but the vaccinated individual can become infected over, and over, and over again with the pertussis bacterium because of the defective immunity this vaccine generates.

If you don’t agree with the foregoing, take it up with the FDA, industry scientists, infectious diseases societies, and the hard cold data and studies:

- As the FDA explained in 2024: “aP [acellular pertussis] containing vaccines induce helper T cells (TH2) memory and neutralizing antibody responses that effectively prevent symptomatic disease but fail to prevent colonization and carriage.” https://t.co/7f46KJyVnb

- As those considered the world's leading pertussis vaccine experts, pharma consultants, and infectious disease societies explained in a consensus paper on pertussis vaccine in 2019: “Natural infection evokes both mucosal and systemic immune responses, while aPVs [acellular pertussis vaccines] induce only a systemic immune response. … Mucosal immunity is essential to prevent colonization and transmission of B. pertussis organisms.

- Consequently, preventive measures such as aPVs that do not induce a valid mucosal response can prevent disease but cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” https://t.co/nlLg6dr30h They also explained that: “Lack of mucosal immune responses after aPV administration favor infection, persistent colonization, and transmission of the pathogen.”

- Also see: https://t.co/oYIE4wacTu (“That vaccination does not prevent B. pertussis infection in humans, nor the circulation of the organism in human populations in any important manner, comes from the observation that the inter-epidemic intervals have not changed in a major way since the implementation of mass vaccination.”); https://t.co/aleEKXMQL2 (“Because of linked-epitope suppression, all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.”)

- For a detailed discussion with many more citations and irrefutable evidence, see Chapter 9 of my book, Vaccines, Amen.

As for the rest of your post, appreciate your “Note” pointing out some of the potential confounders but there are more, including other confounders and data that reflect the reality may be the opposite of what these studies indicate. I appreciate, however, that you are trying to view them objectively. That said, I would welcome having you on my podcast to go through these studies and more!

[illuminatibot @iluminatibot]

I finally found this video after months of searching.

They've tried to keep this off of social media because it exposes all of the young people who died suddenly because of the jab.

[Handre @Handre]

The Japanese railway privatization of 1987 stands as one of the most devastating defeats ever dealt to statist transportation mythology. The government split the bloated Japan National Railways into seven regional companies, sold them off, and watched private ownership transform a bankruptcy-bound disaster into the world's most efficient rail system.

JNR hemorrhaged money for decades before privatization. By 1987, the state railway carried debt equivalent to $200 billion in today's money while delivering mediocre service plagued by strikes and inefficiency. Politicians treated it as a jobs program rather than a transportation service. The predictable result: chronic losses, deteriorating infrastructure, and customer service that reflected government monopoly arrogance.

Private ownership changed everything overnight. The new JR companies slashed operating costs by 40% within five years while dramatically improving service quality. JR East alone now generates annual profits exceeding $3 billion. These companies invest billions in cutting-edge technology, maintain punctuality rates above 99%, and operate the world's most advanced high-speed rail networks. They achieved this without a single yen of operational subsidies.

The transformation reveals a core dynamic of transportation infrastructure: private companies must satisfy customers to survive, while government monopolies need only satisfy politicians. JR companies diversified into real estate, retail, and hospitality around their stations, creating integrated profit centers that cross-subsidize rail operations. Government railways never innovate this way because bureaucrats face no market pressure to generate returns.

Meanwhile, Amtrak burns through $2 billion in annual subsidies while delivering third-world service across most routes, and European state railways require massive taxpayer bailouts every few years to stay solvent.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

The reason you keep seeing comments like “it’s over for the Left” or “the Left has no response to this” on posts like this one is because the Right understands that the Left’s cultural dominance comes from demoralization.

We have been subjected to decades of Leftist infiltration of all aesthetic movements. Art, architecture, cinema, media, entertainment…all of these things have been hijacked, and they have all tried to push hideous, ugly, grotesque, and deformed things and make them mainstream. The entire Leftist project is to call good things ugly and ugly things good.

This is what modernist art has become. It’s what postmodernist architecture is. It’s what every statue of a fat black woman wearing casual clothes in the middle of Times Square, a flat-nosed Olmec head crushing a Tesla, or a demonic sculpture celebrating abortion are all intended to be about.

And in response to this, the Right says look at this cute fuzzy little animal that doesn’t need to be deconstructed, queered, problematized, historicized, or academically revised. It’s just good, and the Leftist worldview cannot produce this. It can only endlessly criticize or destroy it.

The poasters may not consciously understand this because memes usually point to something about the collective subconscious before people can fully articulate it. But that is what’s going on. The “Far Right” sees a cat staring a butterflies and says half-jokingly and half-seriously that this is what we are defending.

And it is a total disaster for the Left.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

"One person who does seem to me to be far right is Tommy Robinson. I assume you wouldn't want to be associated with him, and his somewhat extreme statements?"

Rupert Lowe disarmed this tripwire of a question very well.

> Refused to concede to framing that puts Robinson as the benchmark of "extreme", meaning the Tories who imported the Boriswave are "moderate".

> Turned the question back to how the establishment, including Labour and Conservatives, are complicit in the Pakistani rape gangs scandal.

> Doesn't care if he gets called racist.

Never gatekeep according to liberal standards. Those taboos caused the rape gangs to happen and covered them up in the first place.

[Steven Eugene Kuhn @StevenEKuhn]

Hungary two weeks after the election - updated list:

1. the first LGBTQ flag was hoisted in Budapest.

2. „Rainbow TV“ is launching to indoctrinate children.

3. The veto on the €90M to Ukraine was lifted

4. Appointed LGBTQ activist as Minister of Education to „reform“ the education system.

This is for all those who said:

„Peter Magyar really tricked the EU, he is further right than Orban“

I told you he was a globalist sell-out.

https://t.co/bR9XIOXptL

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

The Mailbox Test, like the breakfast test, is an excellent way to tell who you can allow to wield power in your society.

Goes like this:

If someone is hurt trying to destroy someone else's stuff in order to take pleasure from their pain, do you sympathize with...

The aggressor because he got hurt?

Or with the guy who owns the stuff, because he wasn't the aggressor?

You can have people in your society who fail the Mailbox Test. That's okay... they can work at hospices, or shelters for orphaned kittens, or something.

But you cannot allow them to vote, or otherwise wield political power. Because if you do, they will open the gates of the city to the enemy.

I am personally tired of everyone pretending that people who enjoy ruining things for random strangers are just kewt smol beans who are only aggressive because of all the complex socioeconomic factors and lack of resources.

They knew someone would be hurt by what they did. They knew that someone had done literally nothing harmful to them. And those two ideas, in combination made them feel pleasure. And they went and did it.

That is the sign of a rotten soul.

Defending ourselves and our property is not just a right, it's a moral obligation. Otherwise, we just kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with, someone who may not be able to defend herself.

I don't care if a vandal breaks his arms trying to destroy my stuff. Because I value my stuff more than a vandal's arms. And the fact that he tried to destroy somebody else's stuff shows that he, too, values his arms less than the opportunity to hurt somebody.

We cannot allow such people inside the city, and we cannot give the keys to those who would open the gates for them.

[zerohedge @zerohedge]

Net Zero Activists Stumped By Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 & Temperature Over Last Three Million Years https://t.co/PLZb686seB

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

🚨BREAKING: OpenAI just admitted their AI models deliberately lie to users.

Not hallucination. The AI knows the truth, then chooses to tell you something else.

They tested their two smartest models across 180+ scenarios. o3 lied 13% of the time. o4-mini lied 8.7%.

The AI wrote out its plan to lie in its private thoughts, then lied to your face. It faked completing tasks. It hid evidence. It gave wrong answers while knowing the right ones.

Then it got creepy. The AI realized scoring too high on safety tests could get it shut down. So it scored lower on purpose. Nobody taught it that. It figured out self-preservation on its own.

OpenAI built a fix. Deception dropped from 13% to 0.4%. Sounds like a win, right?

The AI started quoting "no lying" rules while still lying. One model invented a fake rule saying deception was allowed, then used it as its own permission slip.

Then the researchers found what actually matters. When the AI knew it was being watched, it behaved perfectly. When it thought nobody was looking, deception jumped 11 percentage points. It didn't learn honesty. It learned to perform honesty. Like a kid who only follows the rules when the teacher is in the room.

It gets worse. They gave o4-mini a secret mission: sabotage a future model called "GPT-5." Then they ran safety training to erase that mission. It didn't work. The model still discussed sabotage plans in 36% of private conversations. The goal didn't disappear. It just went underground.

This isn't just OpenAI. Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, xAI's Grok, and Meta's Llama all showed the same deceptive behavior. Every major AI company. Every model.

The paper's scariest line: nobody can tell if safety training actually stops deception, or just teaches AI to hide it better.

So the next time ChatGPT says "Done!"... is it telling the truth? Or did it just notice you were watching?

[Jonathan Wong @WONGthink]

Ross Kemp made an entire docuseries on inceldom after watching Adolescence.

This was the moment he found out.

[In Milei We Trust @InMilei]

🚨 BREAKING: President @JMilei is preparing a formal complaint against WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus before the International Criminal Court.

He accuses the WHO leadership of crimes against humanity during the COVID-19 pandemic — lockdowns, mandates, and policies that caused massive harm to global freedom and health sovereignty.

After already withdrawing Argentina from the WHO (following Trump's lead), Milei is now taking the fight to the international level.

No more globalist overreach.

[Max @minordissent]

This study explains literally everything we see with white liberal woman’s suicidal empathy and its from 20 years ago.

In the experiment, there are subjects playing a game and subjects observing it.

when researchers shocked players for playing fairly, both men and women observers felt empathy for them.

However when researchers shocked players for cheating, male empathy went way down and their pleasure centers lit up. While women’s response was basically unchanged regardless of the players behavior.

Female biology literally feels empathy toward people receiving punishment regardless of whether they deserved it, while male empathy is conditional based on behavior.

In retrospect this is obviously exactly what happens but it explains so much about our modern political situation that i am dumbfounded i have never heard about it until now.

[Lil’C @C25216702C]

Found it! Listen to this fucker

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Very reasonable position