@HunterAndrew9x6 Ví này tương tự nhé mọi người cũng 1 con x4, 1 con x6 và flow vẫn là fresh wallet mua token meme (insider, i think so):
0xF919CDE13131c3F661Af73adF119Ca6965DA0D97
AAVE WASN’T HACKED… BUT $6–15 BILLION STILL VANISHED IN DAYS 🔥
- Not a single line of Aave’s code was hacked… yet $6–15 BILLION still disappeared in days.
Yes, you read that correctly. On April 18, 2026, a hacker spoofed just one cross-chain message through LayerZero on Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge.
- Result? The bridge instantly printed $292 million worth of fake rsETH (116,500 tokens — 18% of total supply) out of thin air.
- The attacker didn’t sell them on the open market. Instead, they used the entire fake stack as collateral on Aave V3, Compound, Euler, and SparkLend to borrow real ETH — draining $196–236 million from Aave alone.
Then the real chaos began ⚠️: one of the largest bank runs in recent DeFi history. Justin Sun, MEXC, and hordes of whales all rushed for the exits at once. Aave lost $6–15 billion in TVL within days. WETH pools hit 100% utilization (real liquidity = zero). Leverage traders were trapped mid-position. The AAVE token crashed 16–26%. 📉
The most terrifying part?Aave’s core contracts were never touched. The entire system collapsed simply because the ecosystem trusted one single fake message from a bridge.
- How does this compare to other major DeFi hacks?
Kelp DAO / LayerZero (April 18, 2026): $292M direct → $6–15B TVL cascade. Unique: No protocol was hacked — just spoofed messaging that created fake collateral and triggered a systemic bank run.
1⃣ Drift Protocol (April 1, 2026): $285M — second largest of 2026. Direct exploit, much less contagion.
2⃣ Ronin Bridge (2022): $625M — classic validator compromise and direct theft.
3⃣ Wormhole (2022): $320M — signature verification bug on the bridge.
4⃣ Poly Network (2021): $612M — access control flaw (most funds eventually returned).
🔑 Key difference: Previous major hacks usually stole real assets. Kelp DAO minted fake assets, used them to borrow real money, and then sparked panic across the whole DeFi ecosystem. This is the clearest example yet of composability risk — one weak link (a bridge) can break everything.
👉We’re all chasing 5–6% APY while quietly accepting the risk of total loss the next time any bridge, oracle, or DVN gets compromised.
2026 wake-up call: DeFi doesn’t need more TVL or more chains. It needs real security — not fragile “glue” marketed as innovation.
How much trust do we have left for the next generation of users who haven’t been burned yet?
🤔Serious question.