@internetanarch@TeamYouTube Could you please look into this?
This is a genuine creator on your platform making long-form videos using their own material which they very clearly own.
In this instance, the automated flagging system has not worked.
Additional human review is required.
YouTube demonetised my official compilation channel for "reused content."
YouTube is claiming I am "taking someone else's content and making minimal changes". This is false, the content is mine and significant changes were made to repurpose the content.
The content is my own videos. From my own 1.8M subscriber channel. That I own.
Their own rejection says I was "taking someone else's content." It's literally mine. @TeamYouTube this is a clear error.
@illusivediting Solid, @illusivediting :) IMO your sfx could be dialled back slightly - aim for some longer, slower, deeper whooshes that help smoothen the transitions.
Sound effects - particularly in the intro - can have a notable impact on the audience's perception of quality.
@ShaneEditor@vfxmalice If you don't have a client whose work you'd be proud to post, think of your 'ideal' client and post a spec project for them.
Clients are usually shortsighted.
They only know how good you are based on what they can clearly see.
There's some truth to this, but as a client I'd say that 'posting your best edits' matters WAY more than posting consistently.
Clients browse profiles quickly, so if you have 50 posts but only 1-2 bangers, it's harder for the potential client to quickly qualify that you're good.
I recommend periodically removing old, out-dated work to keep your absolute best at the top of your profile.
@vfxqwazz Really solid qwazz
You could perhaps decrease the dB on one or all of the 3x whooshes you use to emphasise the platform icons
As the 3x whooshes are the same, having them all back to back at similar dB can sound slightly repetitive